Open Access

Ultrastructural localization of extracellular matrix proteins of the lymph node cortex: evidence supporting the reticular network as a pathway for lymphocyte migration

  • Gregg P Sobocinski1,
  • Katherine Toy2,
  • Walter F Bobrowski3,
  • Stephen Shaw4,
  • Arthur O Anderson5 and
  • Eric P Kaldjian6Email author
BMC Immunology201011:42

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2172-11-42

Received: 20 April 2010

Accepted: 17 August 2010

Published: 17 August 2010

Abstract

Background

The lymph node (LN) is a crossroads of blood and lymphatic vessels allowing circulating lymphocytes to efficiently recognize foreign molecules displayed on antigen presenting cells. Increasing evidence indicates that after crossing high endothelial venules, lymphocytes migrate within the node along the reticular network (RN), a scaffold of fibers enwrapped by fibroblastic reticular cells (FRC). Light microscopy has shown that the RN contains specific extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, which are putative molecular "footholds" for migration, and are known ligands for lymphocyte integrin adhesion receptors.

Results

To investigate whether ECM proteins of the RN are present on the outer surface of the FRC and are thus accessible to migrating lymphocytes, ultrastructural immunohistochemical staining of cynomolgus monkey LN was performed using antibodies to human ECM proteins that were successfully employed at the light microscopic level. The fibrillar collagens I and III were observed primarily within the reticular network fibers themselves. In contrast, the matrix proteins laminin, fibronectin, collagen IV, and tenascin were observed within the reticular fibers and also on the outer membrane surface of the FRC.

Conclusions

These findings suggest a molecular basis for how the RN functions as a pathway for lymphocyte migration within the lymph node.

Background

The lymph node is a highly specialized organ in which circulating lymphocytes encounter processed foreign substances that are displayed on antigen presenting cells (APC). Blood-borne lymphocytes enter the node by transmigrating across high endothelial venules (HEV) [13]. From there, T and B lymphocytes travel to their specific compartments within the node [4, 5]. The reticular network (RN) is a highly branched scaffold of inter-connecting fibers each of which is enwrapped by thin cytoplasmic processes of fibroblastic reticular cells [6, 7]. It has been postulated that lymphocytes and APC use the RN as the route for trafficking within the node [4, 5, 810]. Recently, Bajénoff and Miller separately demonstrated the use of the reticular network as a path for lymphocyte trafficking using in vivo video imaging techniques [11, 12, 8].

Immunohistochemical staining at the light microscopic level has demonstrated that the RN contains a variety of extracelluar matrix (ECM) proteins, many of which are known ligands for integrin cell surface adhesion receptors [7]. Although these proteins could theoretically provide molecular "footholds" for cell trafficking along the RN [4, 13], optical resolution does not allow the precise localization of ECM within the RN. It remains possible that these ECM proteins are present only within the fiber core - which is most of the volume of the RN - and not on the outer membrane surface of the enwrapping FRC. If so, the ECM proteins will not be available to migrating cells as stepping stones for movement, and would be unlikely to contribute to trafficking. We therefore undertook an ultrastructural immunohistochemical study in cynomolgus monkey lymph nodes to test the hypothesis that ECM proteins are accessible to migrating cells.

Methods

Care and Use of Laboratory Animals

All work was conducted in accordance with the current guidelines for animal welfare (Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 1996, Animal Welfare Act, 1996, as amended in 1970, 1976 and 1985, 9 CFR Parts 1, 2, 3).

Light Microscopy

Lymph node slices from an adult female cynomolgus monkey were immersion-fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 hours then routinely processed and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin sections were cut at 3 microns and air dried overnight. Heat-induced epitope retrieval, where indicated, was performed in a pressure cooker set at 5 lbs of pressure and 109°C while immersed in either EDTA pH 8.0 or citrate buffer pH 6.0 (Biocare Medical). Slides were cooled for 10 minutes, rinsed, and then stained and developed with diaminobenzidine using the automated NexesTM IHC Staining System (Ventana Medical Systems) using the manufacturer's reagents and protocols. Protease treatment was employed where indicated (Protease 2, Ventana). Primary antibody incubation time was 32 minutes. (See Table 1.)
Table 1

Histochemical (L.M.) Antibody Information.

Primary

Antibody

Type, Species,

IgG-type (Clone)

Dilution

Slide

Pretreatment

Source

Secondary

antibody

Dilution

Source

von Willebrand Factor

Polyclonal, Rabbit anti-Human IgG

1:2000

P2 = 16 min

Dako, A 0082

Universal link

Prediluted

Ventana Medical Systems

Collagen I

Polyclonal, Rabbit anti-Human IgG

1:100

(HIER) EDTA 5 min & P2 = 16 min

Biogenesis, 2150-0020

Universal link

Prediluted

Ventana Medical Systems

Collagen III

Polyclonal, Rabbit anti-Human IgG

1:100

(HIER) EDTA 5 min & P2 = 16 min

Biogenesis, 2150-0100

Universal link

Prediluted

Ventana Medical Systems

Laminin

Polyclonal, Rabbit anti-Mouse IgG

1:25

P2 = 32 min

Cappel, 10765

Universal link

Prediluted

Ventana Medical Systems

Fibronectin

Monoclonal, Mouse anti-Human IgG1 (Clone 568)

1:100

P2 = 32 min

Novo Castra, NCL-FIB

Universal link

Prediluted

Ventana Medical Systems

Collagen IV

Monoclonal, Mouse anti-Human IgG1 (Clone CIV 22(1))

1:100

P2 = 16 min

Dako, M0785

Universal link

Prediluted

Ventana Medical Systems

Electron Microscopy

Lymph node pieces from an adult female cynomolgus monkey was immersed and minced in 1.25% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde fixative, fixed for 2-3 hours, rinsed, and stored in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer. The tissues were then dehydrated and embedded in LR White acrylic resin (Polysciences Inc.), and cold-cured under 365 nm UV light using a Pelco® UVC2 Cryo Chamber (Ted Pella Inc). Ultrathin tissue sections were collected on nickel grids, and stained using the following steps: (1) 10 minute etch with 10% H2O2; (2) 10 minute pre-block with 1% BSA in PBS pH 7.4; (3) primary antibody incubation overnight at 4°C in PBS/BSA; (4) 2 hour secondary antibody incubation at room temperature in PBS/BSA; (5) 5 minute fixation in cacodylate-buffered 2.5% glutaraldehyde pH 7.2; (6) two, 5 minute silver enhancement incubations utilizing an IntenSE™M Silver Enhancement Kit (Amersham, RPN 491); (7) uranyl acetate and lead citrate counter stains of 8 minutes each. Rinses were performed between steps where appropriate. Primary antibodies and secondary 20 nm gold-conjugated anti-IgG antibodies were used at the dilutions listed in Table 2.
Table 2

Immunogold (E.M.) Antibody Information.

Primary

Antibody

Type, Species,

IgG-type (Clone)

Dilution

Source

Secondary

antibody

Dilution

Source

von Willebrand Factor

Polyclonal, Rabbit anti-Human IgG

1:200

Dako, A 0082

Goat anti-Rabbit

1:100

BBI International, EM.GAR20

Collagen I

Polyclonal, Rabbit anti-Human IgG

1:100

Biogenesis, 2150-0020

Goat anti-Rabbit

1:200

BBI International, EM.GAR20

Collagen III

Polyclonal, Rabbit anti-Human IgG

1:200

Biogenesis, 2150-0100

Goat anti-Rabbit

1:100

BBI International, EM.GAR20

Laminin

Polyclonal, Rabbit anti-Mouse IgG

1:200

Cappel, 10765

Goat anti-Rabbit

1:50

BBI International, EM.GAR20

Fibronectin

Monoclonal, Mouse anti-Human IgG1 (Clone 568)

1:200

Novo Castra, NCL-FIB

Goat anti-Mouse

1:100

BBI International, EM.GAF20

Collagen IV

Monoclonal, Mouse anti-Human IgG1 (Clone CIV 22(1))

1:100

Dako, M0785

Goat anti-Mouse

1:50

BBI International, EM.GAF20

Tenascin-C

Monoclonal, Mouse anti-Human IgG1 (Clone TN2)

1:50

Dako, M0636

Goat anti-Mouse

1:100

BBI International, EM.GAF20

Quantification

Stained grids were viewed on a Philips CM 100 BIOTWIN transmission electron microscope. Images were captured using a digital camera (AMT Advantage CCD Camera System). For each stain, five separate fields (original magnification = 2,850×, area = approximately 65 square micrometers) were selected that included representative reticular fibers and associated fibroblastic reticular cells. These images were scored independently by two investigators (GPS, EPK) by counting silver-enhanced gold particles and categorizing according to location as described in Figure 1. A mean score was calculated. Variability in counts between investigators was within 3-5%.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2172-11-42/MediaObjects/12865_2010_Article_326_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Immunogold particle scoring method.

In some cases, the area of evaluation contained a reticular fiber surrounded by a FRC, a part of which bordered a second adjacent fiber directly (which was in turn enwrapped by another FRC). These areas were understood to represent fiber branching points. Particles present on this membrane-fiber interface were considered part of the "outer reticular fiber" region rather than the "outer membrane" of FRC, since ECM here would not be accessible to migrating lymphocytes.

Results

Light microscopy immunohistochemistry

Staining of monkey lymph node using anti-human ECM antibodies revealed a pattern similar to that observed in human lymph node [7, 10, 14]. Figure 2 shows representative images of collagen I and IV and fibronectin stains. Staining is observed along the reticular fibers and around blood vessels, where the fibers form sheaths that join the endothelial basement membrane, but is absent in endothelial cells. In contrast, von Willibrand Factor (vWF), an endothelial marker, is present in the endothelial cells only, and not the fibers. It is apparent that the limits of optical resolution do not allow determination of whether the ECM proteins are present on the outer membrane of the FRCs, within the reticular cells themselves, or within the fibers. (See Figure 2)
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2172-11-42/MediaObjects/12865_2010_Article_326_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Light microscopy immunohistochemical stains. von Willebrand Factor stains vessels only (A). Collagen I (B), Collagen IV (C), and Fibronectin (D) all stain heavily within the reticular fiber network. (All images are same magnification).

Ultrastructural immunohistochemistry

To technically evaluate the post-embedding immunohistochemical method, we stained monkey LN with antibody directed against von Willebrand factor (vWF). Silver-enhanced immunogold particles marked endothelial cells of the HEV present in the lymph node cortex. There was virtually no label observed in the subjacent endothelial basement membrane and background staining was minimal. Since staining of reticular fibers was equivalent to background levels throughout the section, we used the vWF stain as a negative control for non-specific staining in the quantitative assessment of ECM proteins (see Figure 3B and below). Since fibrils of collagens I and III are known to be present within the reticular fibers [7, 10, 15], we used stains for these collagens as positive controls. Label for both collagens was observed on the fibrils seen within the fiber, but not in the FRC or the surrounding tissues. It was noted that cross-sections of reticular fibers labeled less densely than did longitudinal sections (Figure 4B).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2172-11-42/MediaObjects/12865_2010_Article_326_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

von Willebrand Factor immunoelectron microscopic staining. vWF is detected in the endothelial cells (A+B) of the HEV. Note lack of staining in the lymphocytes and the basement membrane matrix. Labeling in the reticular fiber (C) for von Willebrand Factor is non-specific. (Same magnification for images B and C).

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2172-11-42/MediaObjects/12865_2010_Article_326_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Fibrillar collagen immunoelectron microscopy. Collagen I (A) and Collagen III (B) are both easily detected within the reticular fiber of these serial sections. Label particles are more numerous in longitudinal section of reticular fiber (B, left RF) than in cross-section (B, right RF) (see discussion). (Same magnification for images A and B).

Collagen IV, laminin, tenascin, and fibronectin are basement membrane-associated ECM proteins (hereafter referred to simply as "basement membrane proteins"). Ultrastructural immunostaining revealed that these proteins are found within the reticular fiber, but not in the FRC cytoplasm (Figure 5). Unlike collagens I and III, however, the basement membrane proteins were also detected on the outer membrane of the FRC. Representative stains for tenascin, collagen IV, and fibronectin (Figure 5 A, C, D) demonstrate electron-dense particles along the outer membrane of a FRC that enwraps a reticular fiber. There were rare examples of fibronectin staining along the outer membrane of a lymphocyte (Figure 6).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2172-11-42/MediaObjects/12865_2010_Article_326_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Basement membrane extracellular matrix protein immunoelectron microscopy. Collagen IV (A), Laminin (B), Tenascin (C), and Fibronectin (D) are all detected within the reticular fiber. In addition, the gold label is also present along FRC outer membranes. (All images are same magnification.)

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2172-11-42/MediaObjects/12865_2010_Article_326_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Fibronectin on lymphocyte surface. Several gold particles were observed along the cytoplasmic membrane of a lymphocyte.

Quantitative localization of staining

In order to provide a quantitative correlate to our qualitative observations, we developed a scheme to score the silver grains on five representative images for each antibody stain. Grains were classified according to their location and then tallied. Figure 1 shows an image with a corresponding diagram that summarizes the scheme. The following micro-anatomic categories were used: (1) within reticular fiber, (2) at reticular fiber-FRC border, (3) within FRC cytoplasm, (4) at the FRC outer surface, and (5) non-specific background. Table 3 shows the mean results of scoring of the images by two investigators. After initial scoring, categories (1) and (2) displayed no independent discriminatory value, and so were combined to yield a score of all grains associated with the reticular fiber. Since there was no appreciable staining of FRC cytoplasm by any of the antibodies, grains in category (3) were considered non-specific background and combined with category (5). Using the resulting three categories, location percentages were calculated for each stain and pie charts were created to visualize the differences (Figure 7).
Table 3

Data-gold particles counted per area.

 

Fibril Associated

FRC-Fiber Border

Total Within Fiber

FRC Cytoplasm

FRC Outer Membrane

Background

Background Plus FRC Cytoplasm

Total Grains Counted

Percent Within Fiber

Percent on FRC Outer Membrane

Percent Background ***

vWF

39

19

58

10

3

186

196

257

23

1

76

Collagen I

168

17

185

9

4

24

33

222

83

2

15

Collagen III

169

20

189

8

2

48

55

246

77

1

22

Collagen IV

449

144

592

5

36

51

56

684

87

5

8

Laminin

69

11

80

6

7

85

91

178

45

4

51

Tenascin

257

99

356

13

32

138

151

538

66

6

28

Fibronectin

275

84

359

4

34

37**

40

433

83

8

9

** 7 grains found on lymphocyte membrane in one fibronectin plate (See Figure 6.)

*** Immunogold granules found within the FRC (Figure 1, area 3) were added to the background tally (Figure 1, area 5) for determining the final statistics, since lack of significant FRC label implies merely background presence.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2172-11-42/MediaObjects/12865_2010_Article_326_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

Pie Chart Quantitation Summary. The negative control vWF antibody primarily labels background structures, whereas the structural proteins collagen I and III are present primarily within the reticular fiber (RF); all three show minimal non-specific label on the outer FRC at ~1%. Fibronectin, collagen IV, and tenascin are distinctly present along the outer FRC and within the RF, with low background staining. Although the background level of laminin is considerably higher, it is nonetheless present along the outer FRC and within the RF at considerably higher amounts than the negative control vWF label.

As explained previously, vWF was used as the negative control for reticular network staining. 76% of the (non-HEV) vWF label was in the background category, 23% within the reticular fiber, and 1% was associated with the FRC outer membrane. For collagens I and III the pattern of staining was reversed, with approximately 80% of the label within the fiber and most of the remainder in background; FRC outer membrane staining was 1-2%, comparable to vWF. Fibronectin and collagen IV stains yielded more than 80% of the label within the fiber, with background less than 10%. Tenascin scored 66% within the fiber, and had background of 28%. These three ECM stains had FRC outer membrane scores that ranged between 5 and 8%, which were considerably increased from the 1% level of vWF. Staining for laminin was weakest of all the stains. Although only 45% of the laminin label was within the fiber, this was still twice the amount present in the vWF control, indicating positive staining. In addition, 4% of the grains were counted on the FRC outer membrane.

Discussion

It has been logically argued that both lymphocytes and antigen presenting cells travel along the RN to reach their respective compartments, since within the node cells "crawl but they can't swim" and thus need a road on which to travel [16, 7]. Recently, video imaging of fluorescently labeled cells in a murine in vivo system has demonstrated real-time interaction between lymphocytes and the cells of the RN as they traffic through the node [11, 8]. Fibronectin [17, 18], collagen IV, tenascin, and laminin, are basement membrane (BM) ECM components present within the RN [10, 1922] that are known ligands for integrin adhesion receptors, influencing cell taxis in vitro. Consequently, it has been postulated that such ECM proteins associated with the RN participate in cell migration across HEV and through the LN [2326, 16, 7, 5, 9, 10]. The known ultrastructure of the RN does not require this to be the case, however, since the matrix components could be confined to the inner region of cable-like collagen fibrils, enwrapped by the thin FRC covering that separates it from the cavernous spaces of the nodal cortex [7]. Given the thinness of the wrapping, the precise location of the matrix proteins is optically irresolvable. By immunoelectron microscopy, however, we were able to localize them to specific regions of the RN.

Like the fibrillar collagens I and III that form the skeletal structure of the RN, the BM ECM proteins were observed within the reticular fiber. Previous studies have shown that the reticular network is a conduit for solutes to pass quickly from the afferent lymphatics entering the sub-capsular sinus to the HEV [27, 28, 5]. It is possible that these BM ECM components within the reticular fiber may participate in this solute transport. But unlike the fibrillar collagens, the BM ECM proteins were also detected on the outer membrane of the FRC - where they are accessible to migrating cells - at a level that was several times greater than background (see Figure 4; Tables 3 and Figure 7). Our observations thus confirm that the RN contains a complex mix of basement membrane-type proteins, and that they are present both within the fibers and on the outer FRC cell surface, where they can function as adhesion ligands for cell migration. This information provides experimental evidence for what had been hypothesized as the basis for cell crawling that is consistent with understood leukocyte motility. Moreover, this has been demonstrated in non-human primate lymph node, which closely resembles its human counterpart.

We observed the occasional absence of FRC cellular processes completely enwrapping the reticular fibers. It has been previously proposed that such gaps in the covering of the reticular fibers may allow direct access to reticular fiber ECM for migrating cells and thus provide the substrate for cell crawling. Ohtani [29] observed "fenestrations" in the FRC of rabbit Peyer's patches, most notably in flat cell processes. Ushiki [30] described incomplete wrapping of fibers in the rat node that was prominent in the medulla but rare in the deep cortex. Our studies were performed on non-human primate lymph nodes that closely resemble human lymph nodes, and investigated the T cell cortex, equivalent to the "deep cortex" of the rat. In this region the RN is made mostly of rope-like cords, rather than sheets, of fibers, and the FRC cell processes covering the fibers are not flat, but tubular. Our findings thus appear consistent with reports that exposed fibers in this region are not commonly found.

It is possible that we have underestimated the amount of membrane-associated ECM relative to fiber-associated ECM. The FRC membrane appears as a one-dimensional, linear structure in sections prepared for transmission electron microscopy. In contrast, the fiber typically appears as a broad, two-dimensional plane. Thus, there is considerably less FRC membrane surface area than fiber surface area in the image fields evaluated. Our method tallied the total number of grains per image field, but did not calculate the density (the number of grains per unit area of membrane or of fiber) of the label within each region category, since defining the thickness of the membrane proved to be too subjective. The density, therefore, of the membrane-associated staining may actually be much higher relative to the density of the fiber-associated staining than the absolute number counts suggest.

Two other notable findings of the label particle distribution were observed in our study. Rarely, as shown in the fibronectin stain in Figure 6, silver grains were observed ringing the outer membrane of individual lymphocytes. It is possible that this represents synthesis by the lymphocyte, which then expresses the fibronectin at its surface; indeed, this has been described by Wagner and colleagues [31]. Alternatively, it may be that as the lymphocyte has traversed through and along the ECM of the node, fibronectin has "stuck" to integrin receptors on the cell surface. In addition, when staining for collagen I and III, we noted increased density of silver grains in longitudinal views of reticular fibers versus cross-sectional views (Figure 4-B). This may imply that the binding epitope is on the outer surface of the collagen triple helix, or somehow simply more accessible from the "side".

It is tempting to speculate on how the expression of adhesion ligands by FRC may guide the migration of cells to specific locations. Since the FRC wrap the reticular fibers, they are directly exposed to the solutes that pass through the FRC conduit from the sub-capsular sinus to the HEV. Thus, they are well-positioned to respond to factors that should logically prompt an increase in immune trafficking, and could increase their surface adhesion ligand density to encourage more efficient migration within the node and a corresponding higher rate of contact with APC [11].

These findings, if substantiated, may have implications for the understanding of immunological diseases [24]. Since direct contact between APC and lymphocyte essential to the generation of immune response, blocking such contact could suppress the abnormal immune activation in autoimmunity. One way to disallow contact is to keep the cells from being able to meet. If travel within the node is in fact regulated by BM ECM proteins on the outer surface of the RN, blocking ligand-adhesion receptor binding with inhibitors could keep the cells from crawling to their correct compartments, and so dampen immune response. Conversely, in disorders of ineffective immunity, weakened immune response may exist from an endogenous inhibition of migration by unknown factors, or by too little BM ECM than required for adequate intra-nodal trafficking. Finally, it is conceivable that metastatic cancer cells may use similar mechanisms for traveling within the node. Thus, modulating the migrating cell-reticular network interaction may be a rational, albeit challenging, therapeutic approach.

Conclusions

We have demonstrated that ECM proteins known to be ligands of immune cell adhesion receptors are expressed on the outer surface of FRC within the cortex of non-human primate lymph nodes. These findings provide a molecular basis for how the RN may function as a pathway for cell migration within the lymph node.

Authors' Information

Gregg P. Sobocinski BSc. CEMT(MSA), QIHC(ASCP). Microscope Imaging Specialist, University of Michigan, Molecular, Cellular, & Developmental Biology Department, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Katherine Toy. HT(ASCP) QIHC(ASCP). Research Laboratory Specialist, University of Michigan, Pathology Department.(Internal Medicine/Oncology), Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Walter F. Bobrowski BSc., CEMT(MSA). Senior Scientist, Pfizer Global R&D, Groton, CT, USA.

Stephen Shaw PhD. Head of Human Immunology Section, Experimental Immunology Branch. NCI, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Arthur O. Anderson PhD Director, Office of Human Use and Ethics, Research Integrity Officer US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, MD, USA.

Eric P. Kaldjian MD, Medical Director, Hearing Health Science, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

List of abbreviations

LN: 

Lymph Node

RN: 

Reticular Network

FRC: 

Fibroblastic Reticular Cell

ECM: 

Extracellular Matrix

APC: 

Antigen Presenting Cells

HEV: 

High Endothelial Venules

vWF: 

von Willebrand factor

BM: 

Basement Membranes.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
MCDB Dept, University of Michigan
(2)
Pathology Dept, University of Michigan
(3)
Pfizer Global R&D
(4)
NCI
(5)
USAMRIID
(6)
Hearing Health Science

References

  1. Anderson ND, Anderson AO, Wyllie RG: Specialized structure and metabolic activities of high endothelial venules in rat lymphatic tissues. Immunology. 1976, 31 (3): 455-473.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Harris H, Miyasaka M: Reversible stimulation of lyphocyte motility by cultured high endothelial cells: mediation by L-selectin. Immunology. 1995, 85 (1): 47-54.Google Scholar
  3. Ebnet K, Kaldjian EP, Anderson AO, Shaw S: Orchestrated Information Transfer Underlying Leukocyte Endothelial Interactions. Annu Rev Immunol. 1996, 14: 155-77. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.14.1.155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Katakai T, Hara T, Lee JH, Gonda H, Sugai M, Shimizu A: A novel reticular stromal structure in lymph node cortex: an immuno-platform for interactions among dendritic cells, T cells and B cells. Int Immunol. 2004, 16: 1133-1142. 10.1093/intimm/dxh113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Katakai T, Hara T, Sugai M, Gonda H, Shimizu A: Lymph Node Fibroblastic Reticular Cells Construct the Stromal Reticulum via Contact with lymphocytes. J exp Med. 2004, 200 (6): 783-795. 10.1084/jem.20040254.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hayakawa M, Kobayashi M, Hoshino T: Direct contact between reticular fibers and migratory cells in the paracortex of mouse lymph nodes: a morphological and quantitative study. Arch Histol Cytol. 1988, 51: 233-240. 10.1679/aohc.51.233.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kaldjian EP, Gretz JE, Anderson AO, Shi Y, Shaw S: Spatial and molecular organization of lymph node T cell cortex: a labyrinthine cavity bounded by an epithelium-like monolayer of fibroblastic reticular cells anchored to basement membrane-like extracellular matrix. International Immunology. 2001, 13 (10): 1243-1253. 10.1093/intimm/13.10.1243.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Miller MJ, Wei SH, Cahalan MD, Parker I: Autonomous T cell trafficking examined in vivo with intravital two-photon microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA. 2003, 100 (5): 2604-2609. 10.1073/pnas.2628040100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sixt M, Kanazawa N, Selg M, Samson T, Roos G, Reinhardt DP, Pabst R, Lutz MB, Sorokin L: The Conduit System Transports Soluble Antigens from the Afferent Lymph to Resident Dendritic Cells in the T Cell Area of the Lymph Node. Immunity. 2005, 22: 19-29. 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.11.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kramer RH, Rosen SD, McDonald KA: Basement-membrane components associated with the extracellular matrix of the lymph node. Cell Tissue Res. 1988, 252: 367-375. 10.1007/BF00214379.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bajénoff M, Egen JG, Koo LY, Laugier JP, Brau F, Glaichenhaus N, Germain RN: Stromal Cell Networks Regulate Lymphocyte Entry, Migration, and Territoriality in Lymph Nodes. Immunity. 2006, 25: 1-13. 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.10.011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Miller MJ, Wei SH, Parker I, Cahalan MD: Two-Photon Imaging of Lymphocyte Motility and Antigen Response in Intact Lymph Node. Science. 2002, 296: 1869-1873. 10.1126/science.1070051.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ogata T, Yamakawa M, Imai Y, Takahashi T: Follicular Dendritic Cells Adhere to Fibronectin and Laminin Fibers Via Their Respective Receptors. Blood. 1996, 88 (8): 2995-3003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gretz JE, Anderson AO, Shaw S: Cords, channels, corridors and conduits: critical architectural elements facilitating cell interactions in the lymph node cortex. Immunological Reviews. 1997, 156: 11-24. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.1997.tb00955.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sims TN, Dustin ML: The immunological synapse: integrins take the stage. Immunological Reviews. 2002, 186: 100-117. 10.1034/j.1600-065X.2002.18610.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gretz EJ, Kaldjian EP, Anderson AO, Shaw S: Sophisticated strategies for information encounter in the lymph node. The reticular network as a conduit of soluble information and a highway for cell traffic. Journal of Immunology. 1996, 157: 495-499.Google Scholar
  17. Kuusela P, Ruoslahti E, Engvall E, Vaheri A: Immunological interspecies cross-reactions of fibroblast surface antigen (fibronectin). Immunochemistry. 1976, 13 (8): 639-42. 10.1016/0019-2791(76)90203-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Stenman S, Vaheri A: Distribution of a major connective tissue protein, fibronectin, in normal human tissues. J Exp Med. 1978, 147 (4): 1054-64. 10.1084/jem.147.4.1054.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Laikka A, Karjalainen H, Virtanen I, Autio-Harmainen H: Immuno-electron-microscopic localization of types III pN-collage and IV collagen, laminin, and tenascin in developing and adult human spleen. Cell Tissue Res. 1995, 282: 117-127. 10.1007/BF00319138.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Crisa L, Cirulli V, Ellismanfi MH, Ishii JK, Elices MJ, Salomon DR: Cell Adhesion and Migration Are Regulated at Distinct Stages of Thymic T Cell Development: The Roles of Fibronectin, VLA4, and VLA5. J Exp Med. 1996, 184: 215-228. 10.1084/jem.184.1.215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Friedl P, Entschladen F, Conrad C, Zänker KS: CD4+ T lymphocytes migrating in three-dimensional collagen lattices lack focal adhesions and utilize 1 integrin-independent strategies for polarization, interaction with collagen fibers and locomotion. Eur J of Immunol. 1998, 28: 2331-2343. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199808)28:08<2331::AID-IMMU2331>3.0.CO;2-C.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Haston WS, Shields JM, Wilkinson PC: Lymphocyte Locomotion and Attachment on Two-dimensional Surfaces and in Three-dimensional Matrices. J Cell Biol. 1982, 92: 747-752. 10.1083/jcb.92.3.747.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Arencibia I, Suárez NC, Wolf-Watz H, Sundqvist KG: Yersina invasin, a bacterial B1-integrin ligand, is a potent inducer of lymphocyte Motility and migration to collagen type IV and fibronectin. Journal of Immunology. 1997, 159: 1853-1859.Google Scholar
  24. Hauzenberger D, Klominek J, Bergström SE, Sundqvist KG: T lymphocyte migration: The influence of interaction via adhesion molecules, the T cell receptor and cytokines. Critical Reviews in Immunology. 1995, 15 (3&4): 285-316.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lidington E, Nöhammer C, Dominguez M, Ferry B, Rose ML: Inhibition of the transendothelial migration of human lymphocytes but not monocytes by phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Clin Exp Immunol. 1996, 104: 66-71. 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1996.d01-660.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gorfu G, Virtanen I, Hukkanen M, Lehto VP, Rousselle P, Kenne E, Lindbom L, Kramer R, Tryggvason K, Patarroyo M: Laminin isoforms of lymph nodes and predominant role of _5-laminin(s) in adhesion and migration of blood lymphocytes. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2008, 84: 701-712. 10.1189/jlb.0108048.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gretz JE, Nordbury CC, Anderson AO, Proudfoot AEI, Shaw S: Lymph-based chemokines and other low molecular weight molecules reach high endothelial venules via specialized conduits while a functional barrier limits access to the lymphocyte microenvironments in lymph node cortex. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2000, 192 (10): 1425-1439. 10.1084/jem.192.10.1425.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sainte-Marie G, Peng FS: Diffusion of a lymph-carried antigen in the fiber network of the lymph node of the rat. Cell Tissue Res. 1986, 245: 481-486. 10.1007/BF00218547.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ohtani O, Kikuta A, Ohtsuka A, Murakami T: Organization of the Reticular Network of Rabbit Peyer's Patches. The Anatomical Record. 1991, 229: 251-258. 10.1002/ar.1092290212.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ushiki T, Ohtani O, Abe K: Scanning Electron Microscopic Studies of Reticular Framework in the Rat Mesenteric Lymph Node. The Anatomical Record. 1995, 241: 113-122. 10.1002/ar.1092410115.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wagner C, Bürger A, Radsak M, Blum S, Hug F, Hänsch GM: Fibronectin synthesis by activated T lymphocytes: up-regulation of a surface-associated isoform with signalling function. Immunology. 2000, 99: 532-539. 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2000.00995.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Sobocinski et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.