Open Access

HLA class I supertypes: a revised and updated classification

  • John Sidney1,
  • Bjoern Peters1,
  • Nicole Frahm2,
  • Christian Brander2 and
  • Alessandro Sette1Email author
BMC Immunology20089:1

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2172-9-1

Received: 13 July 2007

Accepted: 22 January 2008

Published: 22 January 2008

Abstract

Background

Class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules bind, and present to T cells, short peptides derived from intracellular processing of proteins. The peptide repertoire of a specific molecule is to a large extent determined by the molecular structure accommodating so-called main anchor positions of the presented peptide. These receptors are extremely polymorphic, and much of the polymorphism influences the peptide-binding repertoire. However, despite this polymorphism, class I molecules can be clustered into sets of molecules that bind largely overlapping peptide repertoires. Almost a decade ago we introduced this concept of clustering human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles and defined nine different groups, denominated as supertypes, on the basis of their main anchor specificity. The utility of this original supertype classification, as well several other subsequent arrangements derived by others, has been demonstrated in a large number of epitope identification studies.

Results

Following our original approach, in the present report we provide an updated classification of HLA-A and -B class I alleles into supertypes. The present analysis incorporates the large amount of class I MHC binding data and sequence information that has become available in the last decade. As a result, over 80% of the 945 different HLA-A and -B alleles examined to date can be assigned to one of the original nine supertypes. A few alleles are expected to be associated with repertoires that overlap multiple supertypes. Interestingly, the current analysis did not identify any additional supertype specificities.

Conclusion

As a result of this updated analysis, HLA supertype associations have been defined for over 750 different HLA-A and -B alleles. This information is expected to facilitate epitope identification and vaccine design studies, as well as investigations into disease association and correlates of immunity. In addition, the approach utilized has been made more transparent, allowing others to utilize the classification approach going forward.

Background

Class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules bind short peptides derived from the processing of proteins, and present them on the cell surface for T cell scrutiny. Functional MHC molecules are made of a heavy (α) chain and a β2-microglobulin chain. Peptide binding by class I molecules is accomplished by interaction of the peptide amino acid side chains with discrete pockets within the peptide-binding groove of the MHC molecule formed by the α1 and α2 domains of the heavy chain. Typically, in the case of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I, the main binding energy is provided by the interaction of residues in position 2 and the C-terminus of the peptide with the B and F binding pockets of the MHC molecule, respectively [18], although side chains throughout the ligand can have a positive or negative influence on binding capacity. The common chemical specificity of the peptide side chains amongst ligands bound by a specific MHC molecule is termed the binding motif [9].

MHC molecules are extremely polymorphic, and over a thousand allelic variants have already been described at the class I A and B loci. Most of the polymorphism is located in the peptide-binding region, and as a result each variant is believed to bind a unique repertoire of peptide ligands. Despite this polymorphism, HLA class I molecules can be clustered into groups, designated as supertypes, representing sets of molecules that share largely overlapping peptide binding specificity. Each supertype can be described by a supermotif that reflects the broad main anchor motif recognized by molecules within the corresponding supertype. For example, molecules of the A2-supertype share specificity for peptides with aliphatic hydrophobic residues in position 2 and at the C-terminus, while A3-supertype molecules recognize peptides with small or aliphatic residues in position 2 and basic residues at the C-terminus.

The first supertypes were described in the mid-1990's by our group [10]. Using motifs derived from binding data or the sequencing of endogenously bound ligands, along with simple structural analyses, nine different supertypes were defined [11, 12]. Initial peptide binding studies allowed the identification of several peptides with degenerate binding capacity for the A2- [1315], A3- [1618] and B7-supertypes [19, 20]. In subsequent years, additional binding data have been published to confirm the B44- [21], A1- and A24-supertypes [22].

Over time, a number of different and more sophisticated computational approaches have been implemented by others to classify HLA class I alleles into clusters or supertypes [2332]. While in general agreement, additional supertypes, representing either sub-clusters of the original nine or completely novel groupings, have been proposed [23, 32]. Despite differences in various classification schemes, the concept of HLA supertypes has been effectively used to characterize and identify promiscuously recognized T cell epitopes from a variety of different disease targets, including measles-mumps-rubella [33], SARS [34], EBV [35, 36], HIV [3741], Kaposi' Sarcoma Associated Human Herpesvirus [42, 43], HCV [16, 44], HBV [45, 46], HPV [47], influenza [48], P. falciparum [4952], LCMV [53], Lassa virus [54], F. tularensis [55], vaccinia [5658], and also cancer antigens [5968]. Supertypes have also been utilized as a component in several approaches and algorithms designed for predicting peptide candidates with degenerate HLA class I binding capacity [6977]. Finally, supertypes have also been examined as a variable in studies of disease association, rates of susceptibility, and outcome [37, 7886].

The original classification proposed by Sette and Sidney [12] comprised about 100 different class I MHC alleles. However, over the last 10 years, substantially more binding data has been generated, and through the efforts of several seminal MHC-related databases, including SYFPEITHI [87], HLA Ligand [88], FIMM [89] and MHCBN [90], MHC binding motif information is readily accessible. Up-to-date compilations of MHC sequence data are also readily available in the IMGT database [91]. Herein, we analyze the complete list of alleles available through IMGT (release 2.9) using a simple approach largely based on compilation of published motifs, binding data, and analyses of shared repertoires of binding peptides, in conjunction with clustering based on the primary sequence of the B and F peptide binding pockets. As a result, we now provide updated supertype assignments, with new assignments for about 700 different HLA-A and -B alleles. This will permit the use of our original classification scheme based on current data and its comparison to alternative supertype classification methodologies developed since then.

Results

MHC sequences and peptide binding pockets

α1 and 2 chain residues comprising the B and F peptide-binding pockets of 945 HLA A and B class I molecules were extracted and aligned. Based on crystallographic studies [1, 4, 6, 8], residues 7, 9, 24, 34, 45, 63, 66, 67, 70, and 99 were considered as comprising the B pocket, which engages the peptide residue in position 2. The residues comprising the F pocket, which engages the peptide C-terminal residue, were defined as 74, 77, 80, 81, 84, 95, 97, 114, 116, 123, 133, 143, 146, and 147. Further, for the B pocket we defined the subset of residues 9, 45, 63, 66, 67, 70, and 99 as key residues. In the F pocket, the key residues are those in positions 77, 80, 81 and 116.

Pocket chemical specificity

Next, we defined the broad chemical specificity associated with the different B and F pockets. Table 1 summarizes the amino acid residues generally associated with each particular description of binding specificity. The particular set of residues associated with each use of a descriptor may vary with context. While these descriptions largely follow classical textbook definitions, they also consider our own historical use and experience with peptide binding studies. For example, in our analyses we often consider the polar residue Q along with more classically defined aliphatic residues based on observed behavior in MHC peptide binding studies [15, 92, 93]. It is also important to note that some residues are assigned to multiple categories, as their chemical specificity is compatible with different emphases. For example, L would be considered as both aliphatic and hydrophobic. The chemical specificities defining each supertype are listed in Table 2.
Table 1

Physiochemical functionality of peptide side chains.

Pocket specificity

Associated amino acid residues

Acidic

DE

Aliphatic

LIVMQ

Aromatic

FWY

Aromatic and aliphatic

FWYLIVMQ

Aromatic and basic

YRK

Aromatic and large hydrophobic

FWYLIM

Basic

RHK

Hydrophobic

LIVMFWYA

Large hydrophobic

FLIM

Proline

P

Small

AST

Small and aliphatic

ATSVLIMQ

Small hydrophobic

AV

Small, aliphatic and aromatic

ASTVLIMQFWY

Table 2

HLA supertype specificity descriptions.

Supertype(s)

B pocket specificity

F pocket specificity

A01

Small and aliphatic

Aromatic and large hydrophobic

A01 A03

Small and aliphatic

Aromatic and basic

A01 A24

Small, aliphatic and aromatic

Aromatic and large hydrophobic

A02

Small and aliphatic

Aliphatic and small hydrophobic

A03

Small and aliphatic

Basic

A24

Aromatic and aliphatic

Aromatic, aliphatic and hydrophobic

B07

Proline

Aromatic, aliphatic and hydrophobic

B08

Undefined

Aromatic, aliphatic and hydrophobic

B27

Basic

Aromatic, aliphatic, basic and hydrophobic

B44

Acidic

Aromatic, aliphatic and hydrophobic

B58

Small

Aromatic, aliphatic and hydrophobic

B62

Aliphatic

Aromatic, aliphatic and hydrophobic

Peptide-binding motif-based supertype assignments

As a starting point, we have largely utilized the nine supertype designations derived previously [11, 12], with a few exceptions. These exceptions entail specificities that appear to be compatible with multiple supertypes. More specifically, we recognize that some alleles have repertoires overlapping both the A01 and A03 supertypes (e.g., A*3001; see Hamdahl et al., IEDB submission 1000945 [9496]), and others with the A01- and A24-supertypes (e.g., A*2902 [22]). Also, because it utilizes a non-canonical main anchor spacing, and as a result appears to have a repertoire that overlaps with other specificities, we have presently separated HLA B*0801 and other alleles sharing sequence and serological antigen similarities, as a separate cluster. While these B*08 alleles utilize a unique mode of peptide binding, it is likely that in most cases their repertoires overlap significantly with other supertypes, especially the B07-supertype (Sidney, Frahm, Brander and Sette, unpublished observations). As a result, we have not defined this a separate supertype.

Next, the available peptide-binding motifs were compiled. In total, 88 different class I motifs were identified. Motif information was derived from our own peptide-binding studies, or from the published scientific literature as compiled in the SYFPEITHI database [87]. The basis for each motif assignment is listed in Tables 3 and 4 for HLA-A and -B alleles, respectively. Corresponding supertype associations were assigned based on the criteria listed in Table 2.
Table 3

HLA-A motif/structure reference panel alleles.

Allele

Basis for motif

Supertype association

A*0101

Binding assay

A01

A*0201

Binding assay

A02

A*0202

Binding assay

A02

A*0203

Binding assay

A02

A*0204

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

A02

A*0205

Binding assay

A02

A*0206

Binding assay

A02

A*0207

Binding assay

A02

A*0214

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

A02

A*0217

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

A02

A*0301

Binding assay

A03

A*1101

Binding assay

A03

A*2301

Binding assay

A24

A*2402

Binding assay

A24

A*2601

Binding assay

A01

A*2602

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

A01

A*2603

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

A01

A*2902

Binding assay

A01 A24

A*3001

Binding assay

A01 A03

A*3002

Binding assay

A01

A*3003

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

A01

A*3004

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

A01

A*3101

Binding assay

A03

A*3201

Binding assay

A01

A*3301

Binding assay

A03

A*3303

Published motif

A03

A*6601

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

A03

A*6801

Binding assay

A03

A*6802

Binding assay

A02

A*6901

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

A02

A*7401

Binding assay

A03

Table 4

HLA-B motif/structure reference panel alleles.

Allele

Basis for motif

Supertype association

B*0702

Binding assay

B07

B*0703

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B07

B*0705

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B07

B*0801

Binding assay

B08

B*0802

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B08

B*1402

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B27

B*1501

Binding assay

B62

B*1502

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B62

B*1503

Binding assay

B27

B*1508

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B07

B*1509

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B27

B*1510

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B27

B*1512

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B62

B*1513

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B62

B*1516

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B58

B*1517

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B58

B*1518

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B27

B*1801

Binding assay

B44

B*2702

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B27

B*2703

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B27

B*2704

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B27

B*2705

Binding assay

B27

B*2706

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B27

B*2707

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B27

B*2709

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B27

B*3501

Binding assay

B07

B*3503

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B07

B*3701

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B44

B*3801

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B27

B*3901

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B27

B*3902

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B27

B*3909

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B27

B*4001

Binding assay

B44

B*4002

Binding assay

B44

B*4006

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B44

B*4201

Binding assay

B07

B*4402

Binding assay

B44

B*4403

Binding assay

B44

B*4501

Binding assay

B44

B*4601

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B62

B*4801

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B27

B*5101

Binding assay

B07

B*5102

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B07

B*5103

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B07

B*5201

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B62

B*5301

Binding assay

B07

B*5401

Binding assay

B07

B*5501

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B07

B*5502

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B07

B*5601

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B07

B*5701

Binding assay

B58

B*5702

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B58

B*5801

Binding assay

B58

B*5802

Binding assay

B58

B*6701

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B07

B*7301

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B27

B*7801

Pool sequencing/ligand elution

B07

Pocket analysis and supertype assignments

The amino acids comprising the B and F peptide binding pockets were compiled for all alleles for which complete sequence information was available. The positions of specific MHC residues forming the corresponding pockets are listed above. A reference panel of B and F pockets was generated to include all alleles for which the MHC-peptide binding specificity has been defined (see Tables 3 and 4). These B and F pocket structures, along with the associated alleles and corresponding binding specificity are shown in Tables 5 and 6, respectively.
Table 5

B pocket structures of reference panel alleles.

Residues1

Key residues

Reference panel allele(s)

Associated supertype(s)

Specificity

YDSVENIFNY

DENIFNY

B*0801-2

B08

Undefined

YFAVMEKVHC

FMEKVHC

A*0207

A02

Small and aliphatic

YFAVMEKVHF

FMEKVHF

A*0217

A02

Small and aliphatic

YFAVMEKVHY

FMEKVHY

A*0201-4

A02

Small and aliphatic

YFAVMENMHY

FMENMHY

A*0101

A01

Small and aliphatic

YFAVMENVHY

FMENVHY

A*3201, A*7401

A01 A03

Small and aliphatic

YFAVMENVQY

FMENVQY

A*0301

A03

Small and aliphatic

YHSVTEISNS

HTEISNS

B*3701

B44

Acidic

YHSVTNISNY

HTNISNY

B*1801

B44

Acidic

YHTVEEICKY

HEEICKY

B*2702-7, B*2709

B27

Basic

YHTVENICKY

HENICKY

B*7301

B27

Basic

YHTVKEISNY

HKEISNY

B*4001-2, B*4006, B*4501

B44

Acidic

YSAVMEKVHF

SMEKVHF

A*2301, A*2402

A24

Aromatic and aliphatic

YSAVMENVHY

SMENVHY

A*3002-4

A01

Small and aliphatic

YSAVMENVQY

SMENVQY

A*3001

A01 A03

Small and aliphatic

YTAVMENVHY

TMENVHY

A*3101

A03

Small and aliphatic

YTAVMNNVHY

TMNNVHY

A*3301, A*3303

A03

Small and aliphatic

YTAVMQNVQY

TMQNVQY

A*2902

A01 A24

Small, aliphatic and aromatic

YYAVENIYQY

YENIYQY

B*5501-2, B*5601

B07

Proline

YYAVGNIYQY

YGNIYQY

B*5401

B07

Proline

YYAVMEISNY

YMEISNY

B*1501, B*1512

B62

Aliphatic

YYAVMEKVHY

YMEKVHY

A*0205, A*0206, A*0214

A02

Small and aliphatic

YYAVMEKYQY

YMEKYQY

B*4601

B62

Aliphatic

YYAVMENMSY

YMENMSY

B*1516-17, B*5701-2

B58

Small

YYAVMENVQY

YMENVQY

A*1101

A03

Small and aliphatic

YYAVMNIFNY

YMNIFNY

B*1508

B07

Proline

YYAVMNISNY

YMNISNY

B*1502, B*1513

B62

Aliphatic

YYAVMNNVHY

YMNNVHY

A*2601-3

A01

Small and aliphatic

YYAVMNNVQY

YMNNVQY

A*6601, A*6801-2, A*6901

A02 A03

Small and aliphatic

YYAVTEISNY

YTEISNY

B*5201

B62

Aliphatic

YYAVTENMSY

YTENMSY

B*5801-2

B58

Small

YYAVTNIFNY

YTNIFNY

B*3501, B*3503, B*5101-3, B*5301, B*7801

B07

Proline

YYSVEEISNY

YEEISNY

B*1503, B*3902, B*4801

B27

Basic

YYSVENICNS

YENICNS

B*3909

B27

Basic

YYSVENICNY

YENICNY

B*1402, B*1509-10, B*1518, B*3801, B*3901

B27

Basic

YYSVENIYNY

YENIYNY

B*0703

B07

Proline

YYSVENIYQY

YENIYQY

B*0702, B*0705, B*4201, B*6701

B07

Proline

YYTVKEISNY

YKEISNY

B*4402-3

B44

Acidic

1. Based on data presented in Saper et al, and Madden (see Methods), the MHC residues utilized as constituting the B pocket are: 7, 9, 24, 34, 45, 63, 66, 67, 70, and 99. Key residues are those in positions 9, 45, 63, 66, 67, 70, and 99.

Table 6

F pocket structures of reference panel alleles.

Residues1

Key residues2

Reference panel allele(s)

Associated supertype(s)

Specificity

DDTLYIIEHYWTKW

DTLH

A*3001

A01 A03

Aromatic and basic

DDTLYIIRDYWTKW

DTLD

A*0301, A*1101

A03

Basic

DDTLYIMQDYWTKW

DTLD

A*3101, A*3301, A*3303, A*7401

A03

Basic

DDTLYIMRDYWTKW

DTLD

A*6801

A03

Basic

DDTLYIRHYYWTKW

DTLY

A*6802

A02

Aliphatic

DDTLYIRQDYWTKW

DTLD

A*6601

A03

Basic

DDTLYLNHDYWTKW

DTLD

B*2703, B*2705

B27

Hydrophobic and basic

DDTLYLNHHYWTKW

DTLH

B*2709

B27

Large hydrophobic

DDTLYLSNYYWTKW

DTLY

B*2707

B27

Large hydrophobic

DDTLYVRHYYWTKW

DTLY

A*6901

A02

Aliphatic

DGNLYWTNFYWTKW

GNLF

B*7301

B27

Large hydrophobic

DNIAYLMHYYWTKW

NIAY

A*2301, A*2402

A24

Large hydrophobic

DNIAYLNHDYWTKW

NIAD

B*2702

B27

Large hydrophobic

DNTAYLSNYYWTKW

NTAY

B*0802

B08

Hydrophobic

DNTLYIIEHYWTKW

NTLH

A*3002-4

A01

Aromatic

DNTLYIIRDYWTKW

NTLD

A*0101

A01

Aromatic

DNTLYIMRDYWTKW

NTLD

A*2902

A01 A24

Aromatic and large hydrophobic

DNTLYIRQDYWTKW

NTLD

A*2601

A01

Aromatic

DNTLYIRQNYWTKW

NTLN

A*2602

A01

Aromatic

DSIAYIMQDYWTKW

SIAD

A*3201

A01

Aromatic

DSNLYLRDSYWTKW

SNLS

B*4601

B62

Large hydrophobic

DSNLYLRNFYWTKW

SNLF

B*3901-2, B*3909, B*6701

B07 B27

Hydrophobic

DSNLYLSDYYWTKW

SNLY

B*0702-3

B07

Hydrophobic

DSNLYLSNYYWTKW

SNLY

B*0705, B*0801, B*4201

B07

Hydrophobic

DSNLYLWNFYWTKW

SNLF

B*1402

B27

Hydrophobic

DSNLYWTNLYWTKW

SNLL

B*5401, B*5501-2, B*5601

B07

Small hydrophobic

DSNLYWTNYYWTKW

SNLY

B*7801

B07

Hydrophobic

DSTLYLNDYYWTKW

STLY

B*2706

B27

Large hydrophobic

DSTLYLNHDYWTKW

STLD

B*2704

B27

Large hydrophobic

HDTLYIRQDYWTKW

DTLD

A*2603

A01

Aromatic

HDTLYLMHYYWTKW

DTLY

A*0217

A02

Aliphatic

HDTLYLRHYYWTKW

DTLY

A*0202, A*0205, A*0214

A02

Aliphatic

HDTLYVMHYYWTKW

DTLY

A*0204

A02

Aliphatic

HDTLYVRHYYWTKW

DTLY

A*0201, A*0203, A*0206-7

A02

Aliphatic

YDTLYIRNFYWTKW

DTLF

B*3701

B44

Hydrophobic

YNIAYIRDSYWTKW

NIAS

B*1513, B*5301, B*5801

B07 B58 B62

Large hydrophobic

YNIAYIVDSYWTKW

NIAS

B*5701

B58

Large hydrophobic

YNIAYIVNYYWTKW

NIAY

B*5702

B58

Large hydrophobic

YNIAYLRHDYWTKW

NIAD

B*1517

B58

Large hydrophobic

YNIAYLRNFYWTKW

NIAF

B*3801

B27

Large hydrophobic

YNIAYLWDSYWTKW

NIAS

B*5802

B58

Large hydrophobic

YNIAYWRDSYWTKW

NIAS

B*1516

B58

Large hydrophobic

YNIAYWTNYYWTKW

NIAY

B*5101-3, B*5201

B07 B62

Large hydrophobic

YNTAYIRDDYWTKW

NTAD

B*4402-3

B44

Hydrophobic

YSNLYIRDFYWTKW

SNLF

B*3503

B07

Hydrophobic

YSNLYIRDSYWTKW

SNLS

B*1502, B*3501

B07 B62

Hydrophobic

YSNLYLRDSYWTKW

SNLS

B*1501, B*1503, B*1508, B*1512, B*1518, B*1801

B07 B27 B44 B62

Large hydrophobic

YSNLYLRDYYWTKW

SNLY

B*1510

B27

Hydrophobic

YSNLYLRNYYWSKL

SNLY

B*4001

B44

Hydrophobic

YSNLYLRNYYWTKW

SNLY

B*1509

B27

Hydrophobic

YSNLYLSNYYWSKL

SNLY

B*4801

B27

Hydrophobic

YSNLYLSNYYWTKW

SNLY

B*4002

B44

Hydrophobic

YSNLYWRNLYWTKW

SNLL

B*4501

B44

Small hydrophobic

YSNLYWTNYYWTKW

SNLY

B*4006

B44

Hydrophobic

1. Based on data presented in Saper et al, and Madden (see Methods), the MHC residues utilized as constituting the F pocket are: 74, 77, 80, 81, 84, 95, 97, 114, 116, 123, 133, 143, 146, and 147. Key residues are those in positions 77, 80, 81, and 116.

2. The key residue pockets DTLD, DTLH and DTLY are each associated with two different, although overlapping, specificity descriptions. In each case, one description is associated with HLA B27 alleles, and in the other with HLA A alleles. In assigning key residue matches, matches were assigned on the basis of corresponding locus.

Next, the B and F pocket structures of alleles whose peptide binding specificity was unknown were compared against the sequences in the reference panel. For each case, an attempt was made to find an exact match with the full set of residues in the corresponding pocket. If a match was identified, the allele was assigned the associated specificity shown in Tables 5 and 6. If an exact match could not be found, then a match with a key residue sequence was attempted. If no match was identified, the allele was considered unassigned. For each allele where a match for the full or, secondarily, key residue sequence could be identified for both the B and F pockets with any of the alleles indicated in Tables 3 and 4, a corresponding HLA supertype was assigned.

Of the 945 sequences analyzed, matches at both B and F pockets were found for 764 (80.8%) (Table 7). Notably, for the majority (57%) of alleles not in the reference panel full sequence matches were identified at both the B and F pockets. Figures 1 and 2 indicate the alleles associated with each HLA-A or -B supertype, respectively. Conversely, as an index, Additional file 1 provides the supertype assignment for each of the 945 HLA-A and -B alleles examined, along with their respective B and F pocket structures.
Table 7

Quantification of supertype assignments.

  

Classification criteria

Supertype

(n)

Binding assay

Pool sequencing or ligand elution

Full sequence match at B and F

1 full and 1 key sequence match

Key residue match at B and F

A01

61

4

4

42

11

0

A01 A03

9

1

0

4

4

0

A01 A24

10

1

0

8

1

0

A02

75

7

4

57

7

0

A03

86

6

2

68

10

0

A24

47

2

0

36

9

0

B07

165

6

11

96

52

0

B08

19

1

1

13

4

0

B27

98

2

16

52

27

1

B44

108

6

2

57

43

0

B58

22

3

3

12

4

0

B62

64

1

5

44

12

2

Unassigned

181

-

-

-

-

-

Total

945

40

48

489

184

3

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2172-9-1/MediaObjects/12865_2007_Article_146_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Supertype classification of HLA-A alleles. The alleles associated with each HLA-A supertype, multiple supertypes, or that are unclassified, are shown. Under each supertype, alleles are group (by color) on the basis of the stringency of selection: experimentally established motif (i.e., reference panel) (green), exact match(es) in the B and F pockets (white), one exact and one key residue pocket match (yellow), key residue match(es) at B and F pockets (grey). Alleles with no match at one or both pockets are listed with red font.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2172-9-1/MediaObjects/12865_2007_Article_146_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Supertype classification of HLA-B alleles. The alleles associated with each HLA-B supertype, multiple supertypes, or that are unclassified, are shown. Under each supertype, alleles are grouped (by color) on the basis of the stringency of selection as described in the legend to Figure 1.

At the HLA-A locus, alleles were fairly evenly distributed amongst the four supertypes we have defined. Considering the alleles with broad, or dual, specificity (i.e., those assigned as A01–A03 or A01–A24), the minimum was 57 alleles for A24, and the maximum was 95 alleles for A03. 75 alleles were assigned to the A02 supertype, and 80 to the A01 supertype. At the HLA-B locus, the B07-supertype is the largest, with 165 members. 19 alleles were associated with the B08 pattern. As noted above, we hypothesize that alleles in this cluster will likely cross-react with other supertypes (especially B07), so we do not consider this group as a distinct supertype. The B58 supertype was assigned only 22 alleles, making it the smallest supertype.

Novel supertypes could not be identified, but several alleles have specificities spanning two different supertypes

From Tables 5 and 6, it is evident that not all possible combinations of B and F pocket specificities are present within the reference panel. For example, there are no alleles associated with a preference for acidic residues in position 2 and basic residues at the C-terminus. Hence, we were interested to see if combinations not found in the original supertype assignments were revealed in the present analysis. Interestingly, we did not identify any new combinations. It is possible that new specificities will be identified from amongst the set of 181 alleles for which pocket matches could not be obtained. However, we also note that in the majority of these cases, matches could be made if one allowed a single conservative residue change (e.g., E to D). Thus, based on the analyses done to date, it would appear that the set of supertype specificities currently identified will cover virtually all HLA-A and -B class I MHC alleles.

In addition to A*2902 and A*3001, the present analysis has identified 17 alleles expected to have a specificity overlapping two supertypes. Nine alleles matched pocket preference patterns that would be compatible with both the A01- and A03-supertypes, and another 10 with the A01- and A24-supertypes. In the former case, the association was established on the basis of pocket matches with A*3001. Not surprisingly, several, but not all, of the alleles assigned the A01–A03 specificity also share the A30 antigen. The A01–A24 cross-reactivity pattern was established on the basis of pocket matches with A*2902. All of the alleles associated with the A01–A24 pattern also shared the A29 antigen.

Unexpected supertype assignments

Typically, the supertype assignment for a particular allele follows the predominant assignment for other alleles sharing the same serological antigen. With this in mind, we did identify several instances where the current classification differed from what was expected based on serology or previous classification (Table 8). Of these, the more striking ones involve alleles for which the assigned supertype represents a non-conservative change in the binding specificity from what would have been expected. For example, A*0265 and A*0280, which are associated with the A02 serological antigen, and thus might be expected to have an F pocket specificity for hydrophobic/aliphatic residues, were found to have an F pocket matching that of A03 supertype alleles, which have a specificity for positively charged residues. Similarly, B*4012 and B*4440 were found to have B27 supertype B pockets, associated with a preference for positively charged residues, when a B44 supertype specificity for acidic residues might have been expected.
Table 8

Unexpected and/or revised supertype assignments.

 

Supertype assignment

Allele

Expected1or previous

Current

A*0252

A02

A01 A03

A*0265

A02

A03

A*0280

A02

A03

A*3001

A24

A01 A03

A*3002

A24

A01

A*3003

A24

A01

A*3110

A03

A01

A*7410

A03

A01

B*3528

B07

B62

B*3806

B27

B07

B*3807

B27

B07

B*3910

B27

B07

B*3916

B27

B07

B*3917

B27

B07

B*4012

B44

B27

B*4021

B44

B62

B*4406

B44

B07

B*4408

B44

B62

B*4440

B44

B27

B*5518

B07

B27

1. Expected based on serological association.

As noted above, in the present analysis, and contrary to what was done in the original analysis, we did not make supertype assignments for alleles without an exact or key match by considering conservative substitutions. As a result of this more conservative approach, we now no longer assign supertypes to some alleles previously given a supertype designation (Table 9). In the majority of these cases, however, the original designation would still seem to be a reasonable assumption.
Table 9

Alleles reclassified as "unassigned".

Allele

Previous assignment

B pocket match

F pocket match

Comments

A*0102

A01

-

A01 full

Single difference with A*0101 (F to S) at position 9 in B pocket is non-conservative.

A*2404

A24

A24 full

-

F pocket key sequence is similar to A02 and B27 (hydrophobic), so A24 is still likely.

A*3401

A03

-

A03 full

N/K in 63/66 are relatively unique, otherwise similar to A03 in the B pocket.

A*4301

A01

-

A01 full

Q to N in 63 is only difference with A*2601, so A01 is still likely.

B*1301

B62

B62 key

-

Unusual F pocket.

B*1302

B62

B62 key

-

Unusual F pocket.

B*1506

B62

-

B07 B27 B44 B62 full

Single conservative change (Y to F) at position 99 of B pocket, comapred to B*1501; B62 still likely.

B*1521

B62

-

B07 B62 full

S to C change in position 67 is the onlyB pocket difference with B*1501, so B62 is still likely.

B*2708

B27

B27 full

-

Position 77 T to N change is only difference with b*2704, so B27 is still likely.

B*3802

B27

B27 full

-

I to T in position 80 of the F pocket is the only difference with B*3801, so B27 is still likely.

B*4701

B44

-

B27 key

Y to F at position 99 is the only difference with B*4402-3 in the B pocket, so B44 is still likely.

B*4901

B44

B44 full

-

F full pocket is similar to B*3801 (hydrophobic), so B44 is still likely.

Discussion

In the present study we have attempted to classify almost 1000 HLA-A and -B class I alleles into supertypes. This is nearly a 10-fold increase in the number of alleles compared to our original classification done about a decade ago [12]. Besides providing supertype assignments for considerably more alleles, the present report has attempted to make more transparent how the original "phenomenological" classifications were done. About 80% of the 945 alleles examined were classified into one of the nine supertypes identified previously. Analysis of B and F pocket specificity patterns did not suggest the existence of any novel supertypes.

HLA supertypes do not necessarily demarcate groups of alleles with completely non-overlapping repertoires. A binding repertoire overlapping multiple supertypes has been demonstrated previously, for example, in the cases of A*2902 [22] and A*3001 (see Hamdahl et al., IEDB submission 1000945 [9496]). In the present study we have identified 17 other alleles that would appear to have specificities that bridge either the A01 and A03 supertypes, or the A01 and A24 supertypes. At the same time, individual peptides can be readily identified that bear a particular supermotif, but that do not bind individual HLA allele members of the supertype, or that bind alleles of other supertypes, even supertypes associated with a different locus. Typically, in the first case, these phenomena result from differences in motif compatibility, perhaps at secondary positions. The second case likely reflects overlap(s) between the supertypes in terms of specificity, although in rare cases binding can be accomplished when no main anchor motif compatibility is apparent.

These observations are exemplified by a large scale analysis of the capacity of a non-redundant set of 252 known EBV and HIV derived epitopes to bind a panel of 30 different HLA class I A and B molecules (Sidney, Frahm, Brander and Sette, unpublished observations). It was found that about 21% of the peptides bearing a specific supermotif bound a given allele in the corresponding supertype with an affinity of 100 nM, or better. By contrast, only in 1% of the cases considered did an allele bind a peptide that did not have the corresponding supermotif. At the same time, it was noted that in the set of peptides utilized 62% (155/252) have motifs associated with 2 or more supertypes. The pattern of binding also followed this general promiscuity. It is also significant to note that when the same library of peptides was examined for recognition in HIV/EBV patients, it was found that ~95% of the epitopes were recognized in individuals not expressing the allele the epitope was originally reported to be restricted by, and the promiscuity more often than not involved an allele outside of the supertype associated with originally described restricting allele [97]. Thus, it is apparent that the lines of demarcation between supertypes can be fuzzy from the perspective of both the allelic specificity and the peptide motif.

Restriction outside or across supertypes can also originate from overlaps in supermotifs (e.g., A02 and B62), or for alleles such as B*0801 which do not utilize the typical P2/Cterminus anchor spacing. B*0801 utilizes P3 and P5, not P2, and as such may be compatible with several supertypes and alleles. Thus, an A02- or A24-supertype epitope cross-reacting with B*0801 is not an example of a motif "failure", but merely reflects the fact that the specific peptide has both motifs.

It is important to emphasize that supertypes are based on MHC binding, and that MHC binding alone is not sufficient criteria for T cell recognition. Indeed, hundreds of examples of peptides that bind with remarkably high affinity, but that are not recognized by T cells, have been reported in the literature. We note that even in the best affinity ranges (i.e., IC50 <10 nM), rarely more than 10% of the peptides can be expected to be recognized [98]. Similarly, binding affinity is not necessarily correlative of frequency of recognition [99]. It is true that the trend is towards the most frequently recognized peptides being also the highest affinity binders [38, 50, 100], but that is not always the case, and there are clearly cases where the dominant epitope has an IC50 of ~100 nM, while several other non-recognized peptides have affinities in the <10 nM range.

It must also be emphasized that membership of an epitope in a supertype is not sufficient to guarantee its recognition by T cells in the context of different MHC alleles. Peptide binding to MHC is an absolute requirement for an epitope to be recognized by T cells. At the same time, many other factors, including protein expression and processing, as well as T cell repertoire and the specific MHC context, come into play in determining whether a peptide will be an epitope or not, or whether an epitope will be promiscuously recognized within a specific supertype. For example, Goulder and co-workers, studying B7-supertype epitopes, found that differential selection pressure exerted on HIV by CTL targeting identical epitopes, but restricted by distinct HLA alleles from the same supertype, can result in significant functional differences [101]. Macdonald et al., looking at two B44 subtypes described as members of the HLA B44-supertype, reported that a naturally selected dimorphism between the two molecules alters class I structure, peptide repertoire, and T cell recognition [102].

The intent of the current study was to derive an updated classification of HLA class I MHC alleles on the basis of primary anchor specificity. For the vast majority of HLA class I molecules whose binding specificity have been described by crystal structure, pool sequencing or peptide binding studies, the main anchor interactions of the peptide almost invariably involve the MHC B and F pockets, while other pockets likely dictate secondary interactions. This pattern also appears to be true for most macaque and chimpanzee class I alleles studied to date.

There are exceptions, however, and indeed we have not assigned B*08 alleles to a specific supertype in recognition of the fact that these alleles appear to utilize pockets other than the B pocket as a primary anchor contact. For HLA class I molecules in general, the B and F pockets are the most likely main anchor contacts, while other pockets likely dictate secondary interactions. High levels of crossreactivity have been experimentally demonstrated in the case of 6 supertypes for alleles that vary at secondary pockets [15, 17, 2022].

By contrast, in the murine system it is well recognized that other pockets are often the important primary peptide contacts [103109]. Thus, to utilize the classification approach described here in the context of other species, additional pockets may need to be considered. It is also likely that the further parsing or sub-classifying of supertypes on the basis of secondary interactions can be accomplished.

In the case of HLA-B alleles, F pocket specificity is difficult to correlate with a specific sequence, as a diverse pattern of residues appears to be associated with similar binding specificity. Independent of the residues in the F pocket, most HLA-B alleles seem to bind hydrophobic residues. Thus, assignment of B alleles was primarily driven by the specificity exhibited by the B pocket. On the other hand, it is also possible that greater resolution in the F pocket could be achieved as more data become available to discriminate different preference patterns. For example, in the B7 supertype it is apparent that some alleles, like B*3501, prefer large hydrophobic residues, such as Y. Conversely, other B7 supertype alleles, such as B*5401, seem to prefer small hydrophobic residues, such as A, at the C-terminus. While we have noted these subtle differences in preference [20], in practice we have not found that they significantly impact cross-reactivity between the alleles. This perhaps suggests that the C-terminal anchor in some contexts is less important, and that shared secondary preferences can have a stronger influence on degenerate binding capacity than in other cases. At the same time, it may be necessary to consider additional key residues in the analysis of the F pocket. This is exemplified in the cases of A*2603 and A*0301 which have the same key F pocket residues, but which are associated with much different specificity.

The vast majority of HLA-A and -B alleles fall into one of the 9 supertypes we have described. There are likely reasons for this [110], which include evolutionary relationships, but also constraints and limitations inherent in the epitope processing infrastructure. For example, no allele has been identified to date that binds peptides with D, E, Q or P at the C-terminus, which is in congruence with the preferences of both proteasomal cleavage and TAP transport [111], and an observation that has been applied in the rational design of an in vitro test reagent tool (PeptGen) offered as a tool by the Los Alamos HIV Sequence Database [112].

Supertype classification should not be taken to necessarily imply an evolutionary relationship. In some cases this is largely true, as for example in the case of the A2-supertype, where most alleles are associated with the A2 serological antigen. In other cases the relationship is more complicated, such as the gene conversion relationship between the A2, A3 and A68 antigens. This latter example is somewhat of the exception that proves the rule. Supertype associations are based on shared binding specificity, which may result from both common ancestry and convergent evolution [110]. Thus, while alleles within a supertype may have a close evolutionary relationship, that is not a given. Also, alleles (supertypes) sharing specificity at one anchor position may be associated with very disparate specificities at the other.

Other groups have also utilized various methodologies to define supertypes. In general, our classification is in agreement with those derived by other approaches, as compiled by Hertz [32], Lund [23] and Tong [31]. This is not surprising given the good agreement observed between our initial dataset and other classifications, and that the methodology utilized here is not different from the one utilized to derive the original assignments. If there are variations, they usually represent the splitting of a supertype, or reassignment of individual alleles. As in any classification problem of this kind, there is no absolute truth in supertype assignments. The practical application of supertype classification schemes to identify degenerately binding peptides will ultimately show what classification scheme has the most practical value.

Conclusion

The present study represents an update to the HLA class I supertype classification originally described almost a decade ago. Using MHC peptide binding motif data and MHC sequence information that has since become available, supertype associations have now been provided for over 750 HLA-A and -B alleles. In addition, the approach utilized has been made more transparent, allowing others to utilize the classification approach going forward.

Methods

MHC sequences

The sequences of HLA A and B class I alleles were obtained from the IMGT/HLA Database [91, 113], release 2.9. Alleles with incomplete sequences were removed from further analysis. The residues forming the B and F peptide binding pockets were aligned as described in the Results section.

Peptide binding motif reference panel

The main anchor peptide binding motifs recognized by HLA-A and -B molecules were compiled from our own data, or as reported at the SYFPEITHI database [87]. The HLA supertype associated with each motif was assigned as defined previously [11, 12], and/or on the basis of the broad chemical specificity of each supertype indicated in Tables 1 and 2.

Pocket analysis

The residues forming the B and F pockets of each allele in the motif reference panel were compiled as a lookup table in Microsoft Excel. Pockets were defined more stringently by considering all residues forming the pocket, or less stringently by considering only a subset of residues, denominated as key residues, hypothesized to be most directly involved in peptide binding. To assign a B and F pocket specificity for each of the remaining alleles, the reference panel was scanned to identify exact pocket sequence matches. If an exact match could be identified, the allele was assigned the corresponding B or F pocket specificity. Supertype assignments were then made by matching the B and F pocket specificity pattern with the supertype descriptions indicated in Table 2. If an exact match for either the full pocket sequence or key residue sequence could not be made at both the B and F pockets, the allele was considered unassigned.

Abbreviations

EBV: 

(Epstein-Barr virus)

HBV: 

(hepatitis B virus)

HCV: 

(hepatitis C virus)

HIV: 

(human immunodeficiency virus)

HLA: 

(human leukocyte antigen)

HPV: 

(human papilloma virus)

IEDB: 

(Immune Epitope Database)

LCMV: 

(lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus)

MHC: 

(major histocompatibility complex)

SARS: 

(severe acute respiratory syndrome).

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Efforts for this study were supported by funds from NIH-NIAID contracts N01-AI-40023, NO1-AI-40024 and HHSN266200400006C to AS.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Vaccine Discovery, The La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology
(2)
Partners AIDS Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School

References

  1. Guo HC, Jardetzky TS, Garrett TP, Lane WS, Strominger JL, Wiley DC: Different length peptides bind to HLA-Aw68 similarly at their ends but bulge out in the middle. Nature. 1992, 360: 364-6. 10.1038/360364a0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Silver ML, Guo HC, Strominger JL, Wiley DC: Atomic structure of a human MHC molecule presenting an influenza virus peptide. Nature. 1992, 360: 367-9. 10.1038/360367a0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gorga JC, Madden DR, Prendergast JK, Wiley DC, Strominger JL: Crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction studies of the human major histocompatibility antigen HLA-B27. Proteins. 1992, 12: 87-90. 10.1002/prot.340120110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Madden DR: The three-dimensional structure of peptide-MHC complexes. Annu Rev Immunol. 1995, 13: 587-622. 10.1146/annurev.iy.13.040195.003103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Madden DR, Garboczi DN, Wiley DC: The antigenic identity of peptide-MHC complexes: a comparison of the conformations of five viral peptides presented by HLA-A2. Cell. 1993, 75: 693-708. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90490-H.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Madden DR, Gorga JC, Strominger JL, Wiley DC: The three-dimensional structure of HLA-B27 at 2.1 A resolution suggests a general mechanism for tight peptide binding to MHC. Cell. 1992, 70: 1035-48. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90252-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bjorkman PJ, Saper MA, Samraoui B, Bennett WS, Strominger JL, Wiley DC: The foreign antigen binding site and T cell recognition regions of class I histocompatibility antigens. Nature. 1987, 329: 512-8. 10.1038/329512a0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Saper MA, Bjorkman PJ, Wiley DC: Refined structure of the human histocompatibility antigen HLA-A2 at 2.6 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1991, 219: 277-319. 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90567-P.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Falk K, Rotzschke O, Stevanovic S, Jung G, Rammensee HG: Allele-specific motifs revealed by sequencing of self-peptides eluted from MHC molecules. Nature. 1991, 351: 290-6. 10.1038/351290a0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sidney J, Grey HM, Kubo RT, Sette A: Practical, biochemical and evolutionary implications of the discovery of HLA class I supermotifs. Immunol Today. 1996, 17: 261-6. 10.1016/0167-5699(96)80542-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Sette A, Sidney J: HLA supertypes and supermotifs: a functional perspective on HLA polymorphism. Curr Opin Immunol. 1998, 10: 478-82. 10.1016/S0952-7915(98)80124-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sette A, Sidney J: Nine major HLA class I supertypes account for the vast preponderance of HLA-A and -B polymorphism. Immunogenetics. 1999, 50: 201-12. 10.1007/s002510050594.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. del Guercio MF, Sidney J, Hermanson G, Perez C, Grey HM, Kubo RT, Sette A: Binding of a peptide antigen to multiple HLA alleles allows definition of an A2-like supertype. J Immunol. 1995, 154: 685-93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sidney J, del Guercio MF, Southwood S, Hermanson G, Maewal A, Appella E, Sette A: The HLA-A*0207 peptide binding repertoire is limited to a subset of the A*0201 repertoire. Hum Immunol. 1997, 58: 12-20. 10.1016/S0198-8859(97)00206-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sidney J, Southwood S, Mann DL, Fernandez-Vina MA, Newman MJ, Sette A: Majority of peptides binding HLA-A*0201 with high affinity crossreact with other A2-supertype molecules. Hum Immunol. 2001, 62: 1200-16. 10.1016/S0198-8859(01)00319-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chang KM, Gruener NH, Southwood S, Sidney J, Pape GR, Chisari FV, Sette A: Identification of HLA-A3 and -B7-restricted CTL response to hepatitis C virus in patients with acute and chronic hepatitis C. J Immunol. 1999, 162: 1156-64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sidney J, Grey HM, Southwood S, Celis E, Wentworth PA, delGuercio MF, Kubo RT, Chesnut RW, Sette A: Definition of an HLA-A3-like supermotif demonstrates the overlapping peptide-binding repertoires of common HLA molecules. Hum Immunol. 1996, 45: 79-93. 10.1016/0198-8859(95)00173-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Threlkeld SC, Wentworth PA, Kalams SA, Wilkes BM, Ruhl DJ, Keogh E, Sidney J, Southwood S, Walker BD, Sette A: Degenerate and promiscuous recognition by CTL of peptides presented by the MHC class I A3-like superfamily: implications for vaccine development. J Immunol. 1997, 159: 1648-57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sidney J, del Guercio MF, Southwood S, Engelhard VH, Appella E, Rammensee HG, Falk K, Rotzschke O, Takiguchi M, Kubo RT, et al.: Several HLA alleles share overlapping peptide specificities. J Immunol. 1995, 154: 247-59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sidney J, Southwood S, del Guercio MF, Grey HM, Chesnut RW, Kubo RT, Sette A: Specificity and degeneracy in peptide binding to HLA-B7-like class I molecules. J Immunol. 1996, 157: 3480-90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sidney J, Southwood S, Pasquetto V, Sette A: Simultaneous prediction of binding capacity for multiple molecules of the HLA B44-supertype. J Immunol. 2003, 171: 5964-5974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sidney J, Southwood S, Sette A: Classification of A1- and A24-supertype molecules by analysis of their MHC-peptide binding repertoires. Immunogenetics. 2005, 57: 393-408. 10.1007/s00251-005-0004-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lund O, Nielsen M, Kesmir C, Petersen AG, Lundegaard C, Worning P, Sylvester-Hvid C, Lamberth K, Roder G, Justesen S, et al.: Definition of supertypes for HLA molecules using clustering of specificity matrices. Immunogenetics. 2004, 55: 797-810. 10.1007/s00251-004-0647-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhang C, Anderson A, DeLisi C: Structural principles that govern the peptide-binding motifs of class I MHC molecules. J Mol Biol. 1998, 281: 929-47. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Cano P, Fan B, Stass S: A geometric study of the amino acid sequence of class I HLA molecules. Immunogenetics. 1998, 48: 324-34. 10.1007/s002510050439.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Doytchinova IA, Guan P, Flower DR: Identifiying human MHC supertypes using bioinformatic methods. J Immunol. 2004, 172: 4314-23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Reche PA, Reinherz EL: Definition of MHC supertypes through clustering of MHC peptide binding repertoires. LNCS, ICARIS. 2004, 3239: 189-196.Google Scholar
  28. Chelvanayagam G: A roadmap for HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C peptide binding specificities. Immunogenetics. 1996, 45: 15-26. 10.1007/s002510050162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kangueane P, Sakharkar MK, Rajaseger G, Bolisetty S, Sivasekari B, Zhao B, Ravichandran M, Shapshak P, Subbiah S: A framework to sub-type HLA supertypes. Front Biosci. 2005, 10: 879-86. 10.2741/1582.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhao B, Png AE, Ren EC, Kolatkar PR, Mathura VS, Sakharkar MK, Kangueane P: Compression of functional space in HLA-A sequence diversity. Hum Immunol. 2003, 64: 718-28. 10.1016/S0198-8859(03)00078-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Tong JC, Tan TW, Ranganathan S: In silico grouping of peptide/HLA class I complexes using structural interaction characteristics. Bioinformatics. 2007, 23: 177-83. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl563.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hertz T, Yanover C: Identifying HLA supertypes by learning distance functions. Bioinformatics. 2007, 23: e148-55. 10.1093/Bioinformatics/btl324.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ovsyannikova IG, Jacobson RM, Vierkant RA, Pankratz VS, Poland GA: HLA supertypes and immune responses to measles-mumps-rubella viral vaccine: findings and implications for vaccine design. Vaccine. 2007, 25: 3090-100. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.01.020.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Sylvester-Hvid C, Nielsen M, Lamberth K, Roder G, Justesen S, Lundegaard C, Worning P, Thomadsen H, Lund O, Brunak S, et al.: SARS CTL vaccine candidates; HLA supertype-, genome-wide scanning and biochemical validation. Tissue Antigens. 2004, 63: 395-400. 10.1111/j.0001-2815.2004.00221.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Burrows SR, Elkington RA, Miles JJ, Green KJ, Walker S, Haryana SM, Moss DJ, Dunckley H, Burrows JM, Khanna R: Promiscuous CTL recognition of viral epitopes on multiple human leukocyte antigens: biological validation of the proposed HLA A24 supertype. J Immunol. 2003, 171: 1407-12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Khanna R, Burrows SR, Nicholls J, Poulsen LM: Identification of cytotoxic T cell epitopes within Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) oncogene latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1): evidence for HLA A2 supertype-restricted immune recognition of EBV-infected cells by LMP1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. 1998, 28: 451-8. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199802)28:02<451::AID-IMMU451>3.0.CO;2-U.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Trachtenberg E, Korber B, Sollars C, Kepler TB, Hraber PT, Hayes E, Funkhouser R, Fugate M, Theiler J, Hsu YS, et al.: Advantage of rare HLA supertype in HIV disease progression. Nat Med. 2003, 9: 928-35. 10.1038/nm893.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Wilson CC, McKinney D, Anders M, MaWhinney S, Forster J, Crimi C, Southwood S, Sette A, Chesnut R, Newman MJ, et al.: Development of a DNA vaccine designed to induce cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses to Multiple conserved epitopes in HIV-1. J Immunol. 2003, 171: 5611-23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Altfeld MA, Livingston B, Reshamwala N, Nguyen PT, Addo MM, Shea A, Newman M, Fikes J, Sidney J, Wentworth P, et al.: Identification of novel HLA-A2-restricted human immunodeficiency virus type 1-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitopes predicted by the HLA-A2 supertype peptide-binding motif. J Virol. 2001, 75: 1301-11. 10.1128/JVI.75.3.1301-1311.2001.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lichterfeld KL, Williams M, Mui SK, Shah SS, Mothe BR, Sette A, Kim A, Johnston MN, Burgett N, Frahm N, et al.: T cell receptor cross-recognition of an HIV-1 CD8+ T cell epitope presented by closely related alleles from the HLA-A3 superfamily. Int Immunol. 2006, 18: 1179-88. 10.1093/intimm/dxl052.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Honeyborne I, Rathod A, Buchli R, Ramduth D, Moodley E, Rathnavalu P, Chetty S, Day C, Brander C, Hildebrand W, et al.: Motif inference reveals optimal CTL epitopes presented by HLA class I alleles highly prevalent in southern Africa. J Immunol. 2006, 176: 4699-705.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Bihl F, Narayan M, Chisholm JV, Henry LM, Suscovich TJ, Brown EE, Welzel TM, Kaufmann DE, Zaman TM, Dollard S, et al.: Lytic and latent antigens of the human gammaherpesviruses Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus and Epstein-Barr virus induce T-cell responses with similar functional properties and memory phenotypes. J Virol. 2007, 81: 4904-8. 10.1128/JVI.02509-06.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Brander C, O'Connor P, Suscovich T, Jones NG, Lee Y, Kedes D, Ganem D, Martin J, Osmond D, Southwood S, et al.: Definition of an optimal cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitope in the latently expressed Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus kaposin protein. J Infect Dis. 2001, 184: 119-26. 10.1086/322003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wentworth PA, Sette A, Celis E, Sidney J, Southwood S, Crimi C, Stitely S, Keogh E, Wong NC, Livingston B, et al.: Identification of A2-restricted hepatitis C virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitopes from conserved regions of the viral genome. Int Immunol. 1996, 8: 651-9. 10.1093/intimm/8.5.651.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Bertoni R, Sidney J, Fowler P, Chesnut RW, Chisari FV, Sette A: Human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-binding supermotifs predict broadly cross-reactive cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses in patients with acute hepatitis. J Clin Invest. 1997, 100: 503-13.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Livingston BD, Crimi C, Fikes J, Chesnut RW, Sidney J, Sette A: Immunization with the HBV core 18-27 epitope elicits CTL responses in humans expressing different HLA-A2 supertype molecules. Hum Immunol. 1999, 60: 1013-7. 10.1016/S0198-8859(99)00103-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ressing ME, de Jong JH, Brandt RM, Drijfhout JW, Benckhuijsen WE, Schreuder GM, Offringa R, Kast WM, Melief CJ: Differential binding of viral peptides to HLA-A2 alleles. Implications for human papillomavirus type 16 E7 peptide-based vaccination against cervical carcinoma. Eur J Immunol. 1999, 29: 1292-303. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199904)29:04<1292::AID-IMMU1292>3.0.CO;2-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang HG, Pang XW, Shang XY, Xing Q, Chen WF: Functional supertype of HLA-A2 in the presentation of Flu matrix p58-66 to induce CD8+ T-cell response in a Northern Chinese population. Tissue Antigens. 2003, 62: 285-95. 10.1034/j.1399-0039.2003.00102.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Lyke KE, Burges RB, Cissoko Y, Sangare L, Kone A, Dao M, Diarra I, Fernandez-Vina MA, Plowe CV, Doumbo OK, et al.: HLA-A2 supertype-restricted cell-mediated immunity by peripheral blood mononuclear cells derived from Malian children with severe or uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria and healthy controls. Infect Immun. 2005, 73: 5799-808. 10.1128/IAI.73.9.5799-5808.2005.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Doolan DL, Hoffman SL, Southwood S, Wentworth PA, Sidney J, Chesnut RW, Keogh E, Appella E, Nutman TB, Lal AA, et al.: Degenerate cytotoxic T cell epitopes from P. falciparum restricted by multiple HLA-A and HLA-B supertype alleles. Immunity. 1997, 7: 97-112. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80513-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Doolan DL, Southwood S, Freilich DA, Sidney J, Graber NL, Shatney L, Bebris L, Florens L, Dobano C, Witney AA, et al.: Identification of Plasmodium falciparum antigens by antigenic analysis of genomic and proteomic data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 9952-7. 10.1073/pnas.1633254100.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Tang Y, Lin Y, Mao Y, Dong M, Wang H: Cross-binding between Plasmodium falciparum CTL epitopes and HLA class I molecules. Immunol Invest. 2003, 32: 31-41. 10.1081/IMM-120019206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Botten J, Whitton JL, Barrowman P, Sidney J, Whitmire JK, Alexander J, Ting JP, Bui HH, Sette A, Buchmeier MJ: HLA-A2-restricted protection against lethal lymphocytic choriomeningitis. J Virol. 2007, 81: 2307-17. 10.1128/JVI.02063-06.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Botten J, Alexander J, Pasquetto V, Sidney J, Barrowman P, Ting J, Peters B, Southwood S, Stewart B, Rodriguez-Carreno MP, et al.: Identification of protective Lassa virus epitopes that are restricted by HLA-A2. J Virol. 2006, 80: 8351-61. 10.1128/JVI.00896-06.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. McMurry JA, Gregory SH, Moise L, Rivera D, Buus S, De Groot AS: Diversity of Francisella tularensis Schu4 antigens recognized by T lymphocytes after natural infections in humans: identification of candidate epitopes for inclusion in a rationally designed tularemia vaccine. Vaccine. 2007, 25: 3179-91. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.01.039.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Ostrout ND, McHugh MM, Tisch DJ, Moormann AM, Brusic V, Kazura JW: Long-term T cell memory to human leucocyte antigen-A2 supertype epitopes in humans vaccinated against smallpox. Clin Exp Immunol. 2007Google Scholar
  57. Oseroff C, Kos F, Bui HH, Peters B, Pasquetto V, Glenn J, Palmore T, Sidney J, Tscharke DC, Bennink JR, et al.: HLA class I-restricted responses to vaccinia recognize a broad array of proteins mainly involved in virulence and viral gene regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 13980-5. 10.1073/pnas.0506768102.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Pasquetto V, Bui HH, Giannino R, Mirza F, Sidney J, Oseroff C, Tscharke DC, Irvine K, Bennink JR, Peters B, et al.: HLA-A* HLA-A*1101, and HLA-B*0702 Transgenic Mice Recognize Numerous Poxvirus Determinants from a Wide Variety of Viral Gene Products. J Immunol. 2001, 175: 5504-15.Google Scholar
  59. Fikes JD, Sette A: Design of multi-epitope, analogue-based cancer vaccines. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2003, 3: 985-93. 10.1517/14712598.3.6.985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Kawashima I, Hudson SJ, Tsai V, Southwood S, Takesako K, Appella E, Sette A, Celis E: The multi-epitope approach for immunotherapy for cancer: identification of several CTL epitopes from various tumor-associated antigens expressed on solid epithelial tumors. Hum Immunol. 1998, 59: 1-14. 10.1016/S0198-8859(97)00255-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Kawashima I, Tsai V, Southwood S, Takesako K, Celis E, Sette A: Identification of gp100-derived, melanoma-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitopes restricted by HLA-A3 supertype molecules by primary in vitro immunization with peptide-pulsed dendritic cells. Int J Cancer. 1998, 78: 518-24. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19981109)78:4<518::AID-IJC20>3.0.CO;2-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Keogh E, Fikes J, Southwood S, Celis E, Chesnut R, Sette A: Identification of new epitopes from four different tumor-associated antigens: recognition of naturally processed epitopes correlates with HLA-A*0201-binding affinity. J Immunol. 2001, 167: 787-96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Wang RF, Johnston SL, Southwood S, Sette A, Rosenberg SA: Recognition of an antigenic peptide derived from tyrosinase-related protein-2 by CTL in the context of HLA-A31 and -A33. J Immunol. 1998, 160: 890-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Kawashima I, Tsai V, Southwood S, Takesako K, Sette A, Celis E: Identification of HLA-A3-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitopes from carcinoembryonic antigen and HER-2/neu by primary in vitro immunization with peptide-pulsed dendritic cells. Cancer Res. 1999, 59: 431-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Matsueda S, Takedatsu H, Sasada T, Azuma K, Ishihara Y, Komohara Y, Noguchi M, Shichijo S, Itoh K, Harada M: New peptide vaccine candidates for epithelial cancer patients with HLA-A3 supertype alleles. J Immunother (1997). 2007, 30: 274-81. 10.1097/01.cji.0000211340.88835.e7.Google Scholar
  66. Minami T, Matsueda S, Takedatsu H, Tanaka M, Noguchi M, Uemura H, Itoh K, Harada M: Identification of SART3-derived peptides having the potential to induce cancer-reactive cytotoxic T lymphocytes from prostate cancer patients with HLA-A3 supertype alleles. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2007, 56: 689-98. 10.1007/s00262-006-0216-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Takedatsu H, Shichijo S, Katagiri K, Sawamizu H, Sata M, Itoh K: Identification of peptide vaccine candidates sharing among HLA-A3+, -A11+, -A31+, and -A33+ cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 10: 1112-20. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-0797-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Matsueda S, Takedatsu H, Yao A, Tanaka M, Noguchi M, Itoh K, Harada M: Identification of peptide vaccine candidates for prostate cancer patients with HLA-A3 supertype alleles. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11: 6933-43. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0682.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Brusic V, Petrovsky N, Zhang G, Bajic VB: Prediction of promiscuous peptides that bind HLA class I molecules. Immunol Cell Biol. 2002, 80: 280-5. 10.1046/j.1440-1711.2002.01088.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Khan AM, Miotto O, Heiny AT, Salmon J, Srinivasan KN, Nascimento EJ, Marques ET, Brusic V, Tan TW, August JT: A systematic bioinformatics approach for selection of epitope-based vaccine targets. Cell Immunol. 2006, 244: 141-7. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2007.02.005.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Reche PA, Reinherz EL: PEPVAC: a web server for multi-epitope vaccine development based on the prediction of supertypic MHC ligands. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: W138-42. 10.1093/nar/gki357.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhu S, Udaka K, Sidney J, Sette A, Aoki-Kinoshita KF, Mamitsuka H: Improving MHC binding peptide prediction by incorporating binding data of auxiliary MHC molecules. Bioinformatics. 2006, 22: 1648-55. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl141.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhang GL, Khan AM, Srinivasan KN, August JT, Brusic V: MULTIPRED: a computational system for prediction of promiscuous HLA binding peptides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: W172-9. 10.1093/nar/gki452.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Hogan KT, Sutton JN, Chu KU, Busby JA, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF, Slingluff CL: Use of selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry for the detection of specific MHC class I peptide antigens on A3 supertype family members. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2005, 54: 359-71. 10.1007/s00262-004-0592-y.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Doytchinova I, Flower D: The HLA-A2-supermotif: a QSAR definition. Org Biomol Chem. 2003, 1: 2648-54. 10.1039/b300707c.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Guan P, Doytchinova IA, Flower DR: A comparative molecular similarity indices (CoMSIA) study of peptide binding to the HLA-A3 superfamily. Bioorg Med Chem. 2003, 11: 2307-11. 10.1016/S0968-0896(03)00109-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Guan P, Doytchinova IA, Flower DR: HLA-A3 supermotif defined by quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis. Protein Eng. 2003, 16: 11-8. 10.1093/proeng/gzg005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. MacDonald KS, Fowke KR, Kimani J, Dunand VA, Nagelkerke NJ, Ball TB, Oyugi J, Njagi E, Gaur LK, Brunham RC, et al.: Influence of HLA supertypes on susceptibility and resistance to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J Infect Dis. 2000, 181: 1581-9. 10.1086/315472.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. MacDonald KS, Embree JE, Nagelkerke NJ, Castillo J, Ramhadin S, Njenga S, Oyug J, Ndinya-Achola J, Barber BH, Bwayo JJ, et al.: The HLA A2/6802 supertype is associated with reduced risk of perinatal human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmission. J Infect Dis. 2001, 183: 503-6. 10.1086/318092.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. MacDonald KS, Matukas L, Embree JE, Fowke K, Kimani J, Nagelkerke NJ, Oyugi J, Kiama P, Kaul R, Luscher MA, et al.: Human leucocyte antigen supertypes and immune susceptibility to HIV-1, implications for vaccine design. Immunol Lett. 2001, 79: 151-7. 10.1016/S0165-2478(01)00277-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Stephens HA: HIV-1 diversity versus HLA class I polymorphism. Trends Immunol. 2005, 26: 41-7. 10.1016/j.it.2004.11.001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Balamurugan A, Sharma SK, Mehra NK: Human leukocyte antigen class I supertypes influence susceptibility and severity of tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 2004, 189: 805-11. 10.1086/381689.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Lopez-Vazquez A, Mina-Blanco A, Martinez-Borra J, Njobvu PD, Suarez-Alvarez B, Blanco-Gelaz MA, Gonzalez S, Rodrigo L, Lopez-Larrea C: Interaction between KIR3DL1 and HLA-B*57 supertype alleles influences the progression of HIV-1 infection in a Zambian population. Hum Immunol. 2005, 66: 285-9. 10.1016/j.humimm.2005.01.001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Lopez-Larrea C, Mijiyawa M, Gonzalez S, Fernandez-Morera JL, Blanco-Gelaz MA, Martinez-Borra J, Lopez-Vazquez A: Association of ankylosing spondylitis with HLA-B*1403 in a West African population. Arthritis Rheum. 2002, 46: 2968-71. 10.1002/art.10584.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Novitsky V, Gilbert P, Peter T, McLane MF, Gaolekwe S, Rybak N, Thior I, Ndung'u T, Marlink R, Lee TH, et al.: Association between virus-specific T-cell responses and plasma viral load in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype C infection. J Virol. 2003, 77: 882-90. 10.1128/JVI.77.2.882-890.2003.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Scherer A, Frater J, Oxenius A, Agudelo J, Price DA, Gunthard HF, Barnardo M, Perrin L, Hirschel B, Phillips RE, et al.: Quantifiable cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses and HLA-related risk of progression to AIDS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 12266-70. 10.1073/pnas.0404091101.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Rammensee H, Bachmann J, Emmerich NP, Bachor OA, Stevanovic S: SYFPEITHI: database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs. Immunogenetics. 1999, 50: 213-9. 10.1007/s002510050595.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Sathiamurthy M, Hickman HD, Cavett JW, Zahoor A, Prilliman K, Metcalf S, Fernandez Vina M, Hildebrand WH: Population of the HLA ligand database. Tissue Antigens. 2003, 61: 12-9. 10.1034/j.1399-0039.2003.610102.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Schonbach C, Koh JL, Flower DR, Wong L, Brusic V: FIMM, a database of functional molecular immunology: update 2002. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30: 226-9. 10.1093/nar/30.1.226.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Bhasin M, Singh H, Raghava GP: MHCBN: a comprehensive database of MHC binding and non-binding peptides. Bioinformatics. 2003, 19: 665-6. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg055.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Robinson J, Waller MJ, Parham P, de Groot N, Bontrop R, Kennedy LJ, Stoehr P, Marsh SG: IMGT/HLA and IMGT/MHC: sequence databases for the study of the major histocompatibility complex. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 311-4. 10.1093/nar/gkg070.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Falk K, Rotzschke O, Takiguchi M, Gnau V, Stevanovic S, Jung G, Rammensee HG: Peptide motifs of HLA-B58, B60, B61, and B62 molecules. Immunogenetics. 1995, 41: 165-8. 10.1007/BF00182333.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Prilliman KR, Jackson KW, Lindsey M, Wang J, Crawford D, Hildebrand WH: HLA-B15 peptide ligands are preferentially anchored at their C termini. J Immunol. 1999, 162: 7277-84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. The Immune epitope database and analysis resource. [http://www.immuneepitope.org]
  95. Peters B, Sette A: Integrating epitope data into the emerging web of biomedical knowledge resources. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007, 7: 485-90. 10.1038/nri2092.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Peters B, Sidney J, Bourne P, Bui HH, Buus S, Doh G, Fleri W, Kronenberg M, Kubo R, Lund O, et al.: The immune epitope database and analysis resource: from vision to blueprint. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3: e91-10.1371/journal.pbio.0030091.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Frahm N, Yusim K, Suscovich TJ, Adams S, Sidney J, Hraber P, Hewitt HS, Linde CH, Kavanagh DG, Woodberry T, et al.: Extensive HLA class I allele promiscuity among viral CTL epitopes. Eur J Immunol. 2007, 37: 2419-33. 10.1002/eji.200737365.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Assarsson E, Sidney J, Oseroff C, Pasquetto V, Bui HH, Frahm N, Brander C, Peters B, Grey H, Sette A: A quantitative analysis of the variables affecting the repertoire of T cell specificities recognized after vaccinia virus infection. J Immunol. 2007, 178: 7890-901.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Bihl F, Frahm N, Di Giammarino L, Sidney J, John M, Yusim K, Woodberry T, Sango K, Hewitt HS, Henry L, et al.: Impact of HLA-B alleles, epitope binding affinity, functional avidity, and viral coinfection on the immunodominance of virus-specific CTL responses. J Immunol. 2006, 176: 4094-101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Altfeld M, Allen TM, Kalife ET, Frahm N, Addo MM, Mothe BR, Rathod A, Reyor LL, Harlow J, Yu XG, et al.: The majority of currently circulating human immunodeficiency virus type 1 clade B viruses fail to prime cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses against an otherwise immunodominant HLA-A2-restricted epitope: implications for vaccine design. J Virol. 2005, 79: 5000-5. 10.1128/JVI.79.8.5000-5005.2005.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Leslie A, Price DA, Mkhize P, Bishop K, Rathod A, Day C, Crawford H, Honeyborne I, Asher TE, Luzzi G, et al.: Differential selection pressure exerted on HIV by CTL targeting identical epitopes but restricted by distinct HLA alleles from the same HLA supertype. J Immunol. 2006, 177: 4699-708.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Macdonald WA, Purcell AW, Mifsud NA, Ely LK, Williams DS, Chang L, Gorman JJ, Clements CS, Kjer-Nielsen L, Koelle DM, et al.: A naturally selected dimorphism within the HLA-B44 supertype alters class I structure, peptide repertoire, and T cell recognition. J Exp Med. 2003, 198: 679-91. 10.1084/jem.20030066.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Apostolopoulos V, Yu M, Corper AL, Li W, McKenzie IF, Teyton L, Wilson IA, Plebanski M: Crystal structure of a non-canonical high affinity peptide complexed with MHC class I: a novel use of alternative anchors. J Mol Biol. 2002, 318: 1307-16. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00198-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Apostolopoulos V, Yu M, Corper AL, Teyton L, Pietersz GA, McKenzie IF, Wilson IA, Plebanski M: Crystal structure of a non-canonical low-affinity peptide complexed with MHC class I: a new approach for vaccine design. J Mol Biol. 2002, 318: 1293-305. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00196-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Fremont DH, Stura EA, Matsumura M, Peterson PA, Wilson IA: Crystal structure of an H-2Kb-ovalbumin peptide complex reveals the interplay of primary and secondary anchor positions in the major histocompatibility complex binding groove. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995, 92: 2479-83. 10.1073/pnas.92.7.2479.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Hengel H, Burke K, Kyburz D, Zinkernagel RM, Koszinowski UH: Peptides control the gain and loss of allele specificity by mutated MHC class I molecules. J Immunol. 1995, 154: 4557-64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Li H, Natarajan K, Malchiodi EL, Margulies DH, Mariuzza RA: Three-dimensional structure of H-2Dd complexed with an immunodominant peptide from human immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein 120. J Mol Biol. 1998, 283: 179-91. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2091.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Mata M, Travers PJ, Liu Q, Frankel FR, Paterson Y: The MHC class I-restricted immune response to HIV-gag in BALB/c mice selects a single epitope that does not have a predictable MHC-binding motif and binds to Kd through interactions between a glutamine at P3 and pocket D. J Immunol. 1998, 161: 2985-93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Mitaksov V, Fremont DH: Structural definition of the H-2Kd peptide-binding motif. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 10618-25. 10.1074/jbc.M510511200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Sette A, Sidney J, Livingston B, Dzuris J, Crimi C, Walker CM, Southwood S, Collins EJ, Hughes A: Class I molecules with similar peptide binding specificities are the result of both common ancestry and convergent evolution. Immunogenetics. 2003, 54: 830-841.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Tenzer S, Peters B, Bulik S, Schoor O, Lemmel C, Schatz MM, Kloetzel PM, Rammensee HG, Schild H, Holzhutter HG: Modeling the MHC class I pathway by combining predictions of proteasomal cleavage, TAP transport and MHC class I binding. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005, 62: 1025-37. 10.1007/s00018-005-4528-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Los Alamos HIV Sequence Database. [http://www.hiv.lanl.gov]
  113. IMGT/HLA Database. [http://www.ebi.ac.uk/imgt/hla/]

Copyright

© Sidney et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement