Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies. ICU intensive care unit, SIRS systemic inflammatory response syndrome, TP true positive, FP false positive, TN true negative, FN false negative, ED emergency department, AuROC area under curve, HAP hospital-acquired pneumonia, NR not reported. * within which 15 patients did not have sample available for analysis, † A total of 117 patients were determined with infection, within which 96 patients were bacterial infection, 16 patients were viral infection and five patients were parasite infection. Soluble TREM-1 was used to diagnose bacterial infections in SIRS

From: Diagnostic value of serum soluble triggering expressed receptor on myeloid cells 1 (sTREM-1) in suspected sepsis: a meta-analysis

Study

Country

Setting

Study Design

Patients

Infection Characteristics

Test Timing

Assay Method

Sepsis Prevalence/Mortality (%)

Cut-off (pg/mL)

Sensitivity/Specificity(%)

TP

FP

FN

TN

AuROC

Aksaray S et al., 2016 [14]

Turkey

Medical-surgical ICU

Prospective consecutive

90 patients with SIRS

Lung (44.2%) and blood (21%)

Within 24 h of admission

ELISA (MyBioSource, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA)

57.8 (52)/32.7 (17)

133

71.15/76.32

37

9

15

29

0.78

Barati M et al., 2010 [15]

Iran

Medical and surgical ICU

Prospective consecutive

95 patients with SIRS, 37 non-SIRS patients as control

Not reported

Upon admission at ICU

Quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay (Quantikine, R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, USA)

54.7 (52 in 95)/NR

725

70/60

36

17

16

26

0.65

Brenner T et al., 2016 [16]

Germany

Surgical ICU and post-operative care

Re-analysis of prospective cohort

60 patients with septic shock, 30 post-operative control and 30 healthy volunteers

GI tract (53.3%), others (30%) and lung (20%); Gram-positive (26.7%), Gram-negative (26.7%)

At sepsis onset, 24 h, 4 days, 7 days, 14 days and 28 days

ELISA (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA)

66.7 (60 in 90)/NR

30

98.3/90

59

3

1

27

0.955

Dong Y et al., 2012 [17]

China

Emergency and medical ICU

Prospective

64 patients with SIRS

Respiratory (60.5%), abdominal (14%) and biliary tract (5%)

Within 24 h of recruitment, day 4 and 7

ELISA (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA)

67.2 (43)/32.5 (14)

95.9

76.7/90.5

33

2

10

19

0.868

Gamez-Diaz LY et al., 2011 [18]

Colombia

ED

Cross-sectional study with prospective data

631 patients with possible sepsis syndrome*

CAP (22%), urinary tract (16%) and soft tissue (16%)

Within 24 h of the first ED evaluation

ELISA (Quantikine, R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA)

65.7 (405 in 616)/13.5 (56)

134

60/59.2

243

86

162

125

0.614

Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ et al., 2008 [19]

Greece

ICU

Prospective

69 severely injured patients (ISS > 25) with SIRS, 10 patients with ISS > 25 without SIRS as control group

HAP (79%), acute pyelonephritis (7%) or primary gram-negative bacteremia (14%)

At admission, day 4, 7 and 15; and within 24 h after the diagnosis of any septic complications

homemade enzyme immunosorbent assay

62.3 (43 in 69)/34.9 (15)

40

56.5/91.7

24

2

19

24

0.708

Gibot S et al., 2004 [20]

France

Medical ICU

Prospective consecutive

76 patients with SIRS

Respiratory tract (55%), abdominal (22%) and genitourinary tract (11%); 55% gram-negative and 42% gram-positive in 40 microbiological proven patients

Within 12 h after admission

immunoblots

61.8 (47)/32 (15)

60,000

96/89

45

3

2

26

0.97

Gibot S et al., 2012 [21]

France

ICU

Prospective consecutive

300 patients with SIRS

Lung (49.4%), abdomen (12.3%) and Genitourinary (11%); positive microbiological documents in 88 (57%) pats, with 55% gram-positive and 45% gram-negative

Within 12 h after admission

ELISA (Quantikine, R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA)

51.3 (154)/26 (40)

755

53.2/86.3

82

20

72

126

0.73

Halim B et al., 2015 [22]

Turkey

Hospitalized patients

Prospective

74 patients with SIRS

Respiratory tract (39.4%), GI tract (24.2%) and urinary tract (21%); Gram-positive (21.2%), Gram-negative (60.6%)

On day 0 at admission

ELISA (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA)

44.6 (33)/54.5 (18)

199.72

81.8/73.2

27

11

6

30

0.826

Kofoed K et al., 2007 [23]

Denmark

Department of infectious disease and medical ED

Prospective consecutive

151 patients with SIRS

Respiratory (60.4%), urinary tract (26%) and GI tract (17%)

At inclusion

Luminex multiplex assay (Luminex corp. Austin, TX, USA)

63.6 (96 in 151†)/NR

3500

82/40

79

33

17

22

0.61

Latour-Perez J et al., 2010 [24]

Spain

General ICU

Prospective

114 patients with SIRS

Respiratory (40%), abdominal-pelvis (21%) and urinary (12.5%)

As soon as the detection of SIRS

ELISA (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA)

63.2 (72)/37.5 (27)

463.2

49/79

35

9

37

33

0.62

Li L et al., 2013 [25]

China

Surgical ICU

Prospective consecutive

52 post-operative patients with SIRS

60.5% infected with bacteria, 5.3% with fungi, 28.9% both bacteria and fungi; among 34 patients infected w bacteria, 14 with bacillus, 20 with cocci

Within 12 h after admission

ELISA (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA)

73.1 (38)/48 (25)

73.57

79/79

30

3

8

11

0.82

Li Z et al., 2016 [26]

China

ICU

Prospective consecutive

80 patients with SIRS, 25 healthy volunteers

Respiratory (48%), urinary tract (22%) and abdominal (14%)

First day at admission

ELISA (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA)

62.5 (50 in 80)/30 (15)

123.5

76/76.6

38

7

12

23

0.862

Rivera-Chavez FA et al., 2009 [27]

USA

Surgical ICU

Prospective

93 patients with SIRS, 15 patients with ISS > 25 without SIRS as control group

Lung (60%), abdomen (13%) and blood (12%); 28 (30%) patients with gram-negative isolation, 22 (23%) with gram-positive isolation, and 6 (7%) with fungus

Within 24-36 h after admission

DuoSet enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA)

60.2 (56 in 93)/11 (6)

230

98/91

55

4

1

33

0.97

Song X et al., 2017 [28]

China

Department of gastrointestinal surgery

Prospective

128 SIRS patients after abdominal operation, and 60 healthy controls

Intestinal fistula (23.5%), gastric fistula (19.1%) and ileus (22.1%)

Within 24 h after hospitalization

ELISA (Quantikine, R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA)

53.1 (68 in 128)/21.4 (12)

113.06

80/76

54

14

14

46

0.82

Soud DEM et al., 2011 [29]

Egypt

Surgical ER and ICU of anesthesia

Prospective

70 trauma patients with SIRS, 10 non-SIRS trauma patients as control group

Abdomen (31.6%), chest (26.3) and urinary (15.8%)

Not reported

ELISA (Quantikine, R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA)

27.1 (19 in 70)/NR

254

94.7/91.8

18

4

1

47

NR

Su L et al., 2013 [30]

China

Respiratory, Surgical and Emergency ICU

Prospective

130 patients with SIRS

Pulmonary (83%), post-operative (31%) and urinary tract (24%); Gram-positive (37%), Gram-negative (81%) and fungi (62%)

Within 24 h after admission, and in day 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14

ELISA (Quantikine, R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA)

76.9 (100 in 130)/43 (43)

64.4

91/89.6

91

3

9

27

0.978

Wang H et al., 2011 [31]

China

ICU

Prospective consecutive

56 patients with SIRS, 25 non-SIRS as control group

Not reported

Within 24 h after hospitalization

ELISA (Quantikine, R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA)

57.1 (32)/34 (11)

135

93.8/84.7

30

4

2

20

0.935

Yang J et al., 2014 [32]

China

ICU

Prospective

70 patients with SIRS, 30 non-SIRS as control group

Pneumonia

At day 1, 4 and 7 of admission in sepsis, at day 1 and 4 in SIRS

ELISA (Westang Bio-technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China)

55.7 (39 in 70)/38 (15)

172.15

78.9/82.1

31

6

8

25

0.796