In vivo trafficking and immunostimulatory potential of an intranasally-administered primary dendritic cell-based vaccine
© Vilekar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 21 July 2010
Accepted: 10 December 2010
Published: 10 December 2010
Coccidioidomycosis or Valley fever is caused by a highly virulent fungal pathogen: Coccidioides posadasii or immitis. Vaccine development against Coccidioides is of contemporary interest because a large number of relapses and clinical failures are reported with antifungal agents. An efficient Th1 response engenders protection. Thus, we have focused on developing a dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccine for coccidioidomycosis. In this study, we investigated the immunostimulatory characteristics of an intranasal primary DC-vaccine in BALB/c mouse strain that is most susceptible to coccidioidomycosis. The DCs were transfected nonvirally with Coccidioides- Ag2/PRA-cDNA. Expression of DC-markers, Ag2/PRA and cytokines were studied by flow cytometry, dot-immunoblotting and cytometric bead array methods, respectively. The T cell activation was studied by assessing the upregulation of activation markers in a DC-T cell co-culture assay. For trafficking, the DCs were co-transfected with a plasmid DNA encoding HSV1 thymidine kinase (TK) and administered intranasally into syngeneic mice. The trafficking and homing of TK-expressing DCs were monitored with positron emission tomography (PET) using 18F-FIAU probe. Based on the PET-probe accumulation in vaccinated mice, selected tissues were studied for antigen-specific response and T cell phenotypes using ELISPOT and flow cytometry, respectively.
We found that the primary DCs transfected with Coccidioides-Ag2/PRA-cDNA were of immature immunophenotype, expressed Ag2/PRA and activated naïve T cells. In PET images and subsequent biodistribution, intranasally-administered DCs were found to migrate in blood, lung and thymus; lymphocytes showed generation of T effector memory cell population (TEM) and IFN-γ release.
In conclusion, our results demonstrate that the intranasally-administered primary DC vaccine is capable of inducing Ag2/PRA-specific T cell response. Unique approaches utilized in our study represent an attractive and novel means of producing and evaluating an autologous DC-based vaccine.
Coccidioidomycosis or Valley fever is caused by a dimorphic fungus: Coccidioides posadasii or C. immitis. Due to high virulence, both of the Coccidioides species: C. posadasii and C. immitis have been included in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID)'s list of Biodefense Pathogens and in the Center for Disease Control (CDC)'s list of Select Agents. Coccidioidomycosis is endemic in areas of Southwest US, Mexico and several countries of South America. The infection is initiated by inhalation of air-borne arthroconidia. An insufficient cell-mediated immunity promotes the formation of parasitic-phase endosporulating spherule structures in lung and hematogenous spread of organisms into non-pulmonary organs leading to more severe disseminated coccidioidomycosis . The disseminated infection causes increased morbidity and mortality, specifically in people with immunocompromised conditions. African-Americans, Fillipinos and pregnant women are also at a high risk of developing disseminated coccidioidomycosis . Among all the endemic fungal infections, coccidioidomycosis has generated a great interest in vaccine development because a prior infection engenders immunity, a large number of relapses and clinical failures are reported with the use of conventional antifungal-agents, the disease produces a significant burden of morbidity, the rate of infection is increasing in endemic areas , and most importantly, Coccidioides poses a risk of bioterrorism .
As is evident from the studies in patients with disseminated coccidioidomycosis and animal models, the susceptibility to the disease is related to defective T cell-immune responses . An effective antigen-presentation by antigen-presenting immune cells is a critical step in engendering protective T cell responses. Among a variety of cells, the dendritic cells (DCs) are the most potent antigen-presenting cells. As such, suppressed DC responses are evidently associated with defective T cell responses in patients with disseminated coccidioidomycosis [6, 7], and in susceptible mouse strains, such as BALB/c mouse strain [8, 9]. Unlike other antigen-presenting immune cells, DCs migrate to lymph nodes, and activate naïve immune cells including T cells. Based on this property, DC-based vaccines have been evaluated in animal models of a variety of infections as well as cancer. Some of the DC-based vaccines are currently undergoing pre-clinical/clinical trials for AIDS and different types of cancer [10–19]; a therapeutic DC-vaccine (Sipuleucel-T) was recently approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the management of prostate cancer [20, 21]. Our laboratory's focus is on developing a DC-based vaccine for coccidioidomycosis [8, 22, 23].
The success of a DC-based vaccine depends on multiple factors, including type of antigen, loading efficiency of DCs with antigen, route of administration, trafficking, and the ability to express protective antigen in vivo, interact with naïve immune cells and activate effector immune cells. In a previous study, we reported a DC-vaccine prepared by genetically transfecting the immortalized myeloid JAWS II DCs (ATCC, VA) with a plasmid DNA encoding Coccidioides-Ag2/PRA-cDNA (a potent protective epitope of Coccidioides species) . Furthermore, we showed its protective efficacy as a prophylactic vaccine in reducing the fungal load in syngeneic C57BL6 mouse strain that is moderately susceptible to C. posadasii infection . The study provided a proof-of-principle that the non-virally, genetically-transfected DCs can help reduce the fungal load . Based on these initial results [8, 22–24], we have now prepared a vaccine using primary myeloid DCs. Besides the possibility of the altered immunostimulatory characteristics of primary DCs in different mouse strain, it is also important to note that an immortalized DC cell line may not be used in clinical scenario. It is also expected that an autologous primary DC-based vaccine will be easily translatable and more feasible as a therapeutic vaccine. Here we used BALB/c mouse strain because it is extremely susceptible to coccidioidomycosis, and Coccidioides-infected BALB/c mice present immunological features (less IFN-γ, suppressed DC responses) similar to those observed in patients with disseminated disease [5, 8]. Since the efficacy and functions of DC-vaccination depends primarily on DC-phenotypes, it is important to evaluate the phenotype, stability of antigen expression, in vivo trafficking, antigen presentation and T cell stimulating potential of primary DCs. With these criteria in mind, a DC-vaccine was prepared using BALB/c mice-derived primary DCs by genetically-transfecting with a plasmid DNA containing Coccidioides-Ag2/PRA-cDNA; the phenotype and antigen-presentation were studied. To enable in vivo monitoring of DCs by PET imaging, the DCs were co-transfected with HSV1 thymidine kinase cDNA. The image-derived biodisposition of administered DCs assisted in focusing on select organs for further evaluation of memory T cell populations and Ag2/PRA-specific responses.
Morphology and Phenotype of primary DCs and JAWS II DCs
Immunophenotype and transgene expression in transfected DCs
Cytokine secretion by transfected DCs
Primary DCs transfected with pVR1012-Ag2/PRA-cDNA induce activation of both CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes
Molecular imaging of primary DCs in a mouse model
After comparing the morphology, immunophenotype, expression of the epitope, cytokine release and T cell-stimulatory characteristics of pVR1012-Ag2/PRA-cDNA-transfected primary DCs, we extended our study to investigate the trafficking of primary DCs. We used an HSV1-TK/18F-FIAU system to image the distribution of transfected primary DCs in a syngeneic mouse model.
Uptake of FIAU by JAWS II DCs transfected with pVR1012-TK
In vivo trafficking of primary DCs
Memory T cell phenotypes and Ag2/PRA-specific response
Phenotype of splenic lymphocytes, thymocytes and lymph node cells (as percent CD4+ and CD8+ gated) harvested from DC-vaccinated and control mice after 7 days of first immunization.
CD69+/- activated T cells
CD44+ resting memory
CCR+ CD62L hi
CD69+/- activated T cells
CD44+ resting memory
CCR- CD62L lo
Here, we present our recent data on primary bone-marrow-derived DCs genetically-transfected with Coccidioides-Ag2/PRA in BALB/c mouse strain that is most susceptible to Coccidioides infection. Compared to our earlier study on immortalized JAWS II DCs , the transfection efficiency, viability and immunophenotype of primacy DCs was essentially identical. The transfected primary DCs expressed almost similar levels of GFP, Ag2/PRA and TK protein for at least up to 72 h of transfection under in vitro conditions (Figures 4 and 6). These results confirmed that a non-viral method is equally efficacious for genetic transfection of primary DCs as had been observed for immortalized JAWS II cells [22, 23]. Empirically, the generation of a protective immune response by a DC-based vaccine depends mainly on its phenotype and antigen-presenting functions that may differ among the mouse strains [13, 25–28]. Therefore, we studied basic phenotypic characteristics, antigen-presentation, in vivo trafficking of primary DC-based vaccine in BALB/c mouse strain and the ability of primary DC-based vaccine to induce antigen-specific T cell response.
Our results suggest that primary DCs are morphologically similar to JAWS II DCs under resting conditions (non-transfected). At phenotypic level, we found that the primary DCs were mainly of myeloid DC type, like JAWS II DCs, but there were slight differences in the expression pattern of certain cell-surface markers. For instance, the expression of CD11c, MHC class II and CD80 (all myeloid-specific markers) was more pronounced on the cell-surface of primary DCs as compared to JAWS II DCs (Figure 3). The difference in expression pattern of myeloid DC-specific markers may be due to the differences in culture conditions. As noted above, JAWS II DCs were maintained in culture medium containing GM-CSF only, whereas the primary DCs were cultured in the presence of GM-CSF as well as IL-4. Earlier, Jiang et al., found similar differences in the expression of CD11c, MHC II and CD80 between resting JAWS II DCs and C57BL6 mice-derived primary DCs .
Under in vitro culture-conditions, the DCs mature over a period of time [8, 30]. Thus, the timing of DC culture and harvest needs optimization on case-by-case basis. Since we did not observe any significant difference between the antigen presenting ability of the 2dDC and the 4dDC, we used 2dDC for genetic transfection and immunization. We also observed that CD11c, MHC class II and T cell co-stimulatory molecules (CD40, CD80 and CD86) continued to increase in primary DCs from day 2 to 4. Based on these comparisons of phenotypic and functional analysis, we chose 2dDCs for antigen-presentation and downstream in vivo immunization experiments. We believe that it may ultimately be beneficial in clinical scenarios to obtain the starting material, i.e., primary DCs within 2 days of seeding the bone marrow cells in DC-promoting culture conditions.
We further studied the functional activity of primary DC-vaccine by DC: T cell co-culture assay. The activation of autologous CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was evident in co-culture assays (Figure 8). However, the expression of CD25 and CD69 was more pronounced in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells co-cultured with C57BL6-derived JAWS II vaccine as compared to BALB/c-derived DC- vaccine. We were intrigued by this finding and decided to explore the cytokine secretion. We observed no significant difference in cytokine (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12) secretion by pVR1012-Ag2/PRA-cDNA transfected primary DCs as compared to similarly transfected JAWS II DCs. It is however, apt to mention that we, and others, have found significant differences in DC-responses against Coccidioides in different mouse strains, specifically BALB/c versus DBA/2 and C57BL6 versus DBA/2 [8, 9]. Differences in immune responses elicited by different immunization strategies against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Porphyromonas gingivalis[32, 33] have also been reported in C57BL6 and BALB/c mouse strains. It appears that host genetic factors may be responsible for the differences in antigen-recognition and immune responses in the two mouse strains.
The entire in vitro work discussed thus far pointed towards an effective primary DC vaccine. The first step to realizing this in vivo is to study the distribution and homing of DCs in appropriate tissues and activation of antigen-specific immune response. To accomplish their biological functions, the DCs undergo a complex pattern of migration which includes their localization to both peripheral non-lymphoid tissues and secondary lymphoid organs. In the absence of correct tissue localization, the DCs fail to promote proper immune responses [34–37]. Thus, we studied the trafficking and homing pattern of primary DC-vaccine in BALB/c mouse strain. The short-term trafficking aspect has already been addressed for a C57BL6-derived JAWS II vaccine in a syngeneic C57BL6 mouse model in our earlier study . In our published study, we labeled the JAWS II vaccine with 111In radionuclide and followed the trafficking of cells for a period of 72 h using SPECT (Single photon emission computer tomography). However, we noted some technical limitations with 111In-SPECT for DC-trafficking. One, it does not ensure the integrity of radiolabel and DC association in vivo, second the resolution is poor, and lastly it allows imaging only up to 3-4 days. To overcome these limitations, here we used a molecular PET imaging approach. This is the first time we have been able to study DC-trafficking in vivo up to 7 days of administration. Similar approach however, has been used for imaging the migration of other immune cells and stem cells over a period of 28 days [38–41]. The PET-CT images and the subsequent biodistribution studies suggested that after intranasal administration, significant number of DCs accumulate in lung, thymus and blood. Although the life-span of endogenous DCs is believed to be short, it is not exactly known how long the DCs survive in vivo after administration [42–44]. Our results suggest a likelihood that the primary DC-based vaccine can circulate in the body for at least 7 days of immunization.
Finally, we questioned if the homing of intranasally-administered DC-based vaccine in lung and lymphoid organs is sufficient to induce antigen-specific T cell response and memory. Sufficient evidence exists to support the fact that generation of immunological memory is important for a long-term protection [45, 46]. Using a multi-color flow-cytomteric approach, we found a consistent increase in the number of CD4+ and CD8+ TEM cell population in vaccinated mice suggesting that the DC-vaccine induces an immunological memory. Since the conversion of naïve T cells to memory cells is a dynamic process and involves multiple steps, our efforts will be to investigate the time-dependent analysis of memory T cell distribution. The increased secretion of IFN-γ by lung and lymph node cells correlates well with our previously published results on increased levels of IFN-γ in lung tissue homogenates of DC-vaccinated, Coccidioides-protected mice . Our findings may have direct clinical relevance because the reduced levels of IFN-γ cytokine and T cell anergy are associated with disseminated coccidioidomycosis in human patients and animal models [5, 47].
Overall, our results suggest that the primary DC-vaccine can be prepared by using a simple method of nonviral genetic-transfection, first developed in our laboratory [22, 23]. After intranasal administration, the DC-vaccine migrates to both lymphoid and non-lymphoid organs, induces antigen-specific Th1 response, and generates memory T cells. Efforts are underway to further evaluate maintenance of immune responses and memory on long-term basis and efficacy of DC-vaccine in Coccidioides infection model in BALB/c mouse strain. As described earlier, the Coccidioides-specific DC responses and resulting T cell functions are disabled in the BALB/c mouse strain making them highly susceptible to Coccidioides infection ; the adoptive transfer of DC-vaccine may restore the immunocompetence and contribute to a protective T cell response in infection model.
We used six weeks old female BALB/c and C57BL6 mice (Jackson Laboratories, ME). All procedures, involving animals, were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Oklahoma Health Science Center. An acclimatization period of one week was allowed to the animals prior to any experiment.
Culture of murine bone marrow-derived primary DCs and JAWS II DCs
Primary DCs were obtained by culturing the murine bone marrow cells that were harvested as per the method described earlier [8, 48]. The harvested bone marrow cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco Life Sciences, NY) containing 10 mM N-2-Hydroxyethylpiperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), 10 μg/ml gentamicin, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% MEM nonessential amino acids, 50 μM β-mercaptoethanol, 10 ng/ml recombinant mouse-GM-CSF and 10 ng/ml recombinant mouse-IL-4 (both cytokines from Peprotech, NJ). The cells were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere and the DCs were harvested either on day 2 or day 4 on Optiprep density gradient solution (Accurate Chemicals, NY) . Briefly, nonadherent cells were collected, washed and subjected to density gradient separation. The DCs were isolated as floating cells from the top layer (density < 1.065 g/ml) of the Optiprep density gradient.
JAWS II cells are an immortalized immature myeloid DC cell line derived from the bone marrow of p53-/- C57BL6 mice. We obtained JAWS II cells from ATCC, VA, and maintained them in complete Alpha MEM medium containing 20% FBS, 5 ng/ml GM-CSF and antibiotics [22, 23].
Isolation of splenic lymphocytes
The lymphocytes were isolated from murine spleen using Lympholyte-M solution (Cedarlane, Canada) as per the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, spleen was minced between two sterile glass slides, and a single cell suspension was obtained by passing the minced spleen through a nylon filter (BD Biosciences, CA). Five ml of the splenic cell suspension (~1 × 107 cell/ml in Hanks balanced salt solution) was layered over 5 ml of Lympholyte M and centrifuged for 20 min at 1000-1500 × g. After centrifugation, the lymphocytes were collected from the interface and washed twice, prior to further analysis.
The viability of cells was determined by standard trypan blue dye exclusion test. The cell morphology was observed by staining the air-dried cells with Diff-Quik stain (Dade Behring, IL).
Preparation of Plasmid DNA clones
A plasmid DNA clone encoding full-length Coccidioides-Ag2/PRA-cDNA (pVR1012-Ag2/PRA) was used. We also included pHYG-EGFP (BD Biosciences Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) for measuring the transfection efficiency. In addition, we prepared a plasmid pVR1012-TK clone that carried HSV-1 encoded thymidine kinase (TK). The HSV-1-TK insert was amplified from the pMOD-TK (Invivogen, CA; with low CpG content) using forward primer 5'AAAACTCGAGTCACTATAGGAGGGCCACCA3' carrying the PstI restriction site and reverse primer 5'AGCAAAAAAAGCTCAGCA3' carrying the BamHI restriction site. The PCR amplified HSV-1 TK insert was digested with BamHI and PstI restriction enzymes and subcloned into the pVR1012 vector plasmid DNA (Vical, CA) to obtain pVR1012-TK. The subcloning of the TK insert (1149 bp) was confirmed by restriction digestion. The in-frame cloning was confirmed by sequencing the pVR1012-TK plasmid DNA clone at the Sequencing facility (Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK). The endotoxin-free plasmid DNAs were prepared using Endo-free Maxiprep kit (Qiagen, CA).
Transfection of primary DCs and JAWS II DCs
The primary DCs (2dDC harvested on day 2 and 4dDC harvested on day 4 of culture) and JAWS II DCs were washed with serum free Dulbecco's minimum essential medium (DMEM; Invitrogen, CA) before transfection. A non-viral, lipid-based transfection reagent: TransIT-TKO (Mirus Bio, WI) was used. The transfection reagent-DNA complex (4 μl:2 μg of each plasmid DNA) was prepared in DMEM medium by adding plasmid DNAs (2 μg pHYG-EGFP or 2 μg pVR1012-VP22 vector plasmid DNA or 2 μg pVR1012-Ag2/PRA-cDNA ± 2 μg pVR1012-TK) to the TransIT-TKO reagent. The cells were incubated with the lipid/DNA mixture at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator. The percent transfection efficiency was evaluated by visual enumeration of the green fluorescent transfected cells versus total number of cells using a fluorescent microscope with appropriate filter (Olympus Optical Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). The viability of transfected cells was assessed by flow cytometry after staining the cells with propidium iodide (1 μg/ml).
The protein expression of Ag2/PRA and HSV-1 TK in co-transfected cells was studied by dot-immunoblotting with Ag2/PRA- and TK-specific antibody (Santacruz Biotech, CA), respectively . The recombinant Ag2/PRA protein served as a control. The recombinant Ag2/PRA-protein and specific antibody were obtained from Dr. John Galgiani (University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ). The HSV-1 TK antibody (Santacruz Biotech, CA) was specific to a peptide mapping near the N-terminus of HSV1-TK.
List of fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies.
Fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies for staining DC or lymphocytes
Fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated (FITC)-CD14, CD3, CD86, CD62L; phycoerythrin (PE)-CD11c, CD45R, CD80, PDCA-1; Biotin or allophycocyanin (APC)-CD40, MHC class II (I-A/I-E), 120G8 and B220.
Cells from DC-lymphocyte co-culture
FITC-CD69, PE- CD8b (Ly-3), APC-CD4, PerCP-Cy5.5-CD25.
Splenic lymphocytes, thymocytes and lymph node cells
FITC- CD69, PE-CD127, Pacific orange-CD4, APC-CD8, PerCpCy5.5-CD25, Pacific blue-CD44, APC-Cy7-CD62L, Biotin-CCR7
DC-lymphocyte co-culture experiment
For the DC-lymphocytes co-culture experiments, the DC to splenic lymphocytes ratios and time of incubation were optimized in the pilot experiments. Finally, in the comprehensive experiments, the nontransfected and transfected DCs (2dDC and 4dDC) were co-cultured with splenic lymphocytes (1 DC: 64 T cells) for a period of 24 h. The activation of T cells was determined on the basis of staining of cells with CD4, CD8 (T cell markers), CD25 and CD69 (activation markers)-specific antibodies.
Cytokine analysis in cell-free supernatants of DCs
The cell-free supernatants collected from pVR1012-Ag2/PRA-cDNA-transfected and non transfected cells were analyzed for the secreted cytokines. The amounts of cytokines: tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, IL-12p70 and interferon (IFN)-γ, were measured in cell-free supernatants using mouse inflammation cytometric bead array kit (BD Biosciences, CA). Briefly, 50 μl of 1:10 and 1:100 diluted cell-free supernatants and diluted cytokine standard solutions (20-2500 pg/ml) were mixed with 50 μl of cytokine capture antibody mix and 50 μl of PE detection reagent. The reaction mixtures were incubated for 2 h, washed and resuspended in wash buffer. The samples were then assayed on FACS Calibur flow cytometer. The acquired data were analyzed for the amounts of cytokines in samples with the BD Cell Quest and CBA Array software programs.
Monitoring of primary murine DC-based vaccine by PET-CT imaging
In order to study the in vivo trafficking of primary DCs, the cells were co-transfected with pVR1012-Ag2/PRA-cDNA and pVR1012-TK. The transfection protocol remained identical to that described above. The molecular imaging technique was based on the use of 18F-labeled 2'-fluoro-2'-deoxy-1ß-D-arabinofuranosyl-5-iodouracil (FIAU), a specific substrate for HSV1-TK. The cells expressing HSV1-TK phosphorylate 18F-FIAU to phospho-18F-FIAU, which is then incorporated, thus trapped, in the DNA and detected by PET system. Since untransformed mammalian cells do not express TK enzyme, normal mammalian cells do not phosphorylate FIAU, and therefore, are unable to entrap the probe and generate PET signal.
Radiofluorination to synthesize 18F-FIAU
In a reaction vial containing 500 μl of Kryptofix solution (12 mg/ml), about 15 μl of K2CO3 (100 mg/ml) was added. The 18F-fluoride radioactivity was added to the reaction vial and the mixture was evaporated to dryness at 160°C under nitrogen gas. Azeotropic evaporation was performed with acetonitrile to remove all traces of water. The chemical precursor, 2-O-[(trifluoromethyl) sulfonyl]-1,3,5-tri-O-benzoyl-α-D-ribofuranose (1) in dimethylformamide (10 mg in 250 μl) was added to the reaction vial. The reaction mixture was heated at 160°C for 8 min. The reaction vial was transferred to a heated block (110°C), and the solvent was evaporated to about 50 μl under nitrogen. The vial was cooled to room temperature and dichloromethane (DCM, 5 ml) was added to the vial. The solution was then passed through a Sep-Pak silica cartridge (ChromTech, IL) to remove unreacted 18F-fluoride. The 18F-labeled compound 2 was obtained in the DCM eluate with 50% radiochemical yield (RCY).
1-(2'-Deoxy-2'-[18F]-fluoro-3,5-di-O-benzoyl-D-arabinofuranosyl) pyrimidines (3)
The DCM solution of compound 2 was dried under nitrogen, and the residue was re-dissolved in chloroform (200 μl). To the solution of 2, 2,4-bis-O-(trimethylsilyl)-5-iodouracil (200 μl of 0.252 M solution in acetonitrile), trimethyltrifluromethane sulfonate (20 μl) and bis-(trimethylsilyl)trifluoro acetamide (20 μl) were added. The reaction mixture was heated at 100°C for 30 min, and passed through Sep-Pak silica cartridge to obtain compound (3) as isomeric mixture in chloroform.
1-(2'-Deoxy-2'-[18F]-fluoro-D-arabinofuranosyl) pyrimidines (4)
Compound 3 was dried and the residue was added with acetonitrile (500 μl) and 250 μl of sodium methoxide (0.5 N) solution The mixture was heated at 100°C for 10 min, and the alkalinity was neutralized by adding 1.0 ml of 0.1% acetic acid. The de-protected 18F-FIAU was obtained by passing the mixture through a Sep-Pak C-18 column to collect the 18F-FIAU as a combination of α and β isomers. The isomeric mixture was concentrated and injected into an HPLC column (Phenomenex Luna column, 5 μm, 250 × 4.6 mm). Pure β-isomer of 18F-FIAU was collected as a peak with retention time of 9.8 min using a gradient system (5% to 100% acetonitrile in water over 25 min) at 254 nm wavelength. The product (Compound 4) was dried and dissolved in saline with an overall RCY of 30-35%, and >95% radiochemical purity. The purity of the product was confirmed by injecting a small fraction of the finished product into an analytical HPLC, and spiking it with authentic FIAU (Moravek Biochemicals, Brea, CA).
Measurement of HSV1-TK enzyme activity in transfected cells
Prior to in vivo imaging, we measured the TK enzyme activity in pVR1012-TK-transfected DCs using following methods.
HSV1-TK enzyme activity assay
Intranasal immunization of syngeneic mice with primary DCs
The cells were transfected with pVR1012-Ag2/PRA-cDNA and pVR1012-TK plasmid DNAs, as described above. After 24 h of transfection, the syngeneic BALB/c mice were immunized with transfected DCs (1-1.5 × 106 DCs suspended in sterile, low-endotoxin 30-40 μl PBS per mouse) via intranasal route . The control mice received DCs transfected with a vector plasmid DNA.
The PET-CT imaging was performed on vaccinated mice on days 2 and 7 of immunization. Radiolabeled 18F-FIAU was intravenously injected in mice via tail vein. The probe was allowed to distribute for 2 h before PET-CT imaging was performed. Mice were anesthetized with 2% isoflurane in an oxygen stream and positioned in the field of view (FOV) of X-PET/X-O-CT machine (Gamma Medica-Ideas, Northridge, CA). A fly-mode CT was acquired (2 min) to establish anatomical landmarks before re-positioning the animal for PET imaging. About 20 min list-mode PET data was acquired. The acquired image data were reconstructed using filtered back projection algorithm. Both PET and CT images were fused together using Amira 3.1 software provided with the imaging system.
Biodistribution of 18F radioactivity
Mice were euthanized 140 min after injecting 18F-FIAU, and various organs and/or tissues (heart, lung, liver, spleen, stomach, intestine, kidney, blood, etc.) were excised under aseptic conditions. The organs were weighed, and the associated 18F radioactivity was counted in an automated gamma counter (Cobra II, Perkin-Elmer). The organ-associated counts were expressed as percent of injected dose per gram of tissue.
T cell phenotype and Ag2/PRA-specific response in DC-vaccinated mice
In a separate set of DC-vaccinated mice, the lung, thymus, spleen and lymph nodes (superficial cervical, axillary, brachial and inguinal) were harvested on day 7 and lymphocytes were isolated using Lympholyte M density gradient solution as described above.
The splenic lymphocytes, thymocytes and lymph node cells were stained with antibodies conjugated to 8 different fluorochromes (Table 2). Single fluorochrome-conjugated stained lymphocytes were used for appropriate gating and to confirm no spill over. The T cell phenotype was then studied by flow cytometry. The percent number of CD4+ and CD8+ central memory (TCM) and effector memory (TEM) populations were noted on the basis of expression of CD62L and CCR7.
The T cell response against Ag2/PRA protein was assessed using ELISPOT assay as per the manufacturer's instructions (eBioscience, CA). Briefly, the wells of PVDF membrane ELISPOT assay plates (Millipore, CA) were coated with capture antibody to IFN-γ, IL-4 or IL-17A. The cells were seeded onto the antibody-coated wells at the density of 0.8-32 × 106 cells/ml and incubated in RPMI medium containing 10% FBS and antibiotics for 48 h in presence of recombinant Ag2/PRA (1 μg/ml). Subsequently, the biotinylated detection antibody, streptavidin-horse-radish-peroxidase conjugate and substrate solution were added, and development of spots was monitored. The wells were washed and air-dried. The spots were counted using a dissecting microscope. The frequency of cytokine-secreting, antigen-specific cells on the filtration membranes was calculated as the number of spots in the presence of Ag2/PRA minus the number of spots per equal number of cells in medium alone. Finally, the numbers of cytokine secreting cells harvested from mice immunized with vector plasmid DNA transfected DCs were subtracted from those in DC-vaccinated mice.
The results were analyzed by Student t-test for statistical significance using Prism software (Graphpad, San Diego, CA). The significant difference between the experimental and control groups was noted at p < 0.05.
Authors thank Mr. Jim Henthorn, Flow Cytometry Imaging Facility, OUHSC for providing help with flow cytometry. Authors acknowledge a generous gift of recombinant Ag2/PRA-protein and antibody by Dr. John Galgiani, University of Arizona, Tempe, AZ. Finally, contributions from Ms. Kaelyn Lu, who participated in this work as Summer undergraduate student (May-July 2008) in SA's lab under Summer Undergraduate Research Enhancement Program, are appreciated.
Grant Support: The research presented in this publication was made possible by the Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology's OHRS award to the project #HR07-119.
Footnote: Parts of this work have been presented at the annual meetings of the American Association of Immunologists (2009, 2010) and Society of Nuclear Medicine (2010).
- Laniado-Laborin R: Expanding understanding of epidemiology of coccidioidomycosis in the Western hemisphere. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007, 1111: 19-34. 10.1196/annals.1406.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adam RD, Elliott SP, Taljanovic MS: The spectrum and presentation of disseminated coccidioidomycosis. Am J Med. 2009, 122: 770-7. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.12.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Increase in Coccidioidomycosis - California, 2000-2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009, 58: 105-9.Google Scholar
- Warnock DW: Coccidioides species as potential agents of bioterrorism. Future Microbiol. 2007, 2: 277-83. 10.2217/17460922.214.171.1247.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cox RA, Magee DM: Coccidioidomycosis: host response and vaccine development. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004, 17: 804-39. 10.1128/CMR.17.4.804-839.2004. table of contentsPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Richards JO, Ampel NM, Galgiani JN, Lake DF: Dendritic cells pulsed with Coccidioides immitis lysate induce antigen-specific naive T cell activation. J Infect Dis. 2001, 184: 1220-4. 10.1086/323664.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Richards JO, Ampel NM, Lake DF: Reversal of coccidioidal anergy in vitro by dendritic cells from patients with disseminated coccidioidomycosis. J Immunol. 2002, 169: 2020-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Awasthi S, Magee DM: Differences in expression of cell surface co-stimulatory molecules, Toll-like receptor genes and secretion of IL-12 by bone marrow-derived dendritic cells from susceptible and resistant mouse strains in response to Coccidioides posadasii. Cell Immunol. 2004, 231: 49-55. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2004.11.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- del Pilar Jimenez AM, Viriyakosol S, Walls L, Datta SK, Kirkland T, Heinsbroek SE, Brown G, Fierer J: Susceptibility to Coccidioides species in C57BL/6 mice is associated with expression of a truncated splice variant of Dectin-1 (Clec7a). Genes Immun. 2008, 9: 338-48. 10.1038/gene.2008.23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rinaldo CR: Dendritic cell-based human immunodeficiency virus vaccine. J Intern Med. 2009, 265: 138-58. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.02047.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Whiteside TL, Piazza P, Reiter A, Stanson J, Connolly NC, Rinaldo CR, Riddler SA: Production of a dendritic cell-based vaccine containing inactivated autologous virus for therapy of patients with chronic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009, 16: 233-40. 10.1128/CVI.00066-08.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Engell-Noerregaard L, Hansen TH, Andersen MH, Thor Straten P, Svane IM: Review of clinical studies on dendritic cell-based vaccination of patients with malignant melanoma: assessment of correlation between clinical response and vaccine parameters. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2009, 58: 1-14. 10.1007/s00262-008-0568-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tan YF, Sim GC, Habsah A, Leong CF, Cheong SK: Experimental production of clinical-grade dendritic cell vaccine for acute myeloid leukemia. Malays J Pathol. 2008, 30: 73-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burgdorf SK, Fischer A, Myschetzky PS, Munksgaard SB, Zocca MB, Claesson MH, Rosenberg J: Clinical responses in patients with advanced colorectal cancer to a dendritic cell based vaccine. Oncol Rep. 2008, 20: 1305-11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhou Q, Guo AL, Xu CR, An SJ, Wang Z, Yang SQ, Wu YL: A dendritic cell-based tumour vaccine for lung cancer: full-length XAGE-1b protein-pulsed dendritic cells induce specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in vitro. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008, 153: 392-400. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03724.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walker DG, Laherty R, Tomlinson FH, Chuah T, Schmidt C: Results of a phase I dendritic cell vaccine trial for malignant astrocytoma: potential interaction with adjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Neurosci. 2008, 15: 114-21. 10.1016/j.jocn.2007.08.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murthy V, Moiyadi A, Sawant R, Sarin R: Clinical considerations in developing dendritic cell vaccine based immunotherapy protocols in cancer. Curr Mol Med. 2009, 9: 725-31. 10.2174/156652409788970689.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gilboa E: DC-based cancer vaccines. J Clin Invest. 2007, 117: 1195-203. 10.1172/JCI31205.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wheeler CJ, Black KL: DCVax-Brain and DC vaccines in the treatment of GBM. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2009, 18: 509-19. 10.1517/13543780902841951.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Antonarakis ES, Drake CG: Current status of immunological therapies for prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2010, 20: 241-6. 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283381793.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patel PH, Kockler DR: Sipuleucel-T: a vaccine for metastatic, asymptomatic, androgen-independent prostate cancer. Ann Pharmacother. 2008, 42: 91-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Awasthi S, Cox RA: Transfection of murine dendritic cell line (JAWS II) by a nonviral transfection reagent. Biotechniques. 2003, 35: 600-2, 4Google Scholar
- Awasthi S, Awasthi V, Magee DM, Coalson JJ: Efficacy of Antigen 2/Proline-Rich Antigen cDNA-Transfected Dendritic Cells in Immunization of Mice against Coccidioides posadasii. J Immunol. 2005, 175: 3900-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Awasthi S: Dendritic cell-based vaccine against coccidioides infection. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007, 1111: 269-74. 10.1196/annals.1406.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holmstrom K, Pedersen AW, Claesson MH, Zocca MB, Jensen SS: Identification of a microRNA signature in dendritic cell vaccines for cancer immunotherapy. Hum Immunol. 2009, 71: 67-73. 10.1016/j.humimm.2009.10.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Kooten C, Stax AS, Woltman AM, Gelderman KA: Handbook of experimental pharmacology "dendritic cells": the use of dexamethasone in the induction of tolerogenic DCs. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2009, 233-49. full_text.Google Scholar
- Dohnal AM, Graffi S, Witt V, Eichstill C, Wagner D, Ul-Haq S, Wimmer D, Felzmann T: Comparative evaluation of techniques for the manufacturing of dendritic cell-based cancer vaccines. J Cell Mol Med. 2009, 13: 125-35. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00304.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lesterhuis WJ, Aarntzen EH, De Vries IJ, Schuurhuis DH, Figdor CG, Adema GJ, Punt CJ: Dendritic cell vaccines in melanoma: from promise to proof?. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008, 66: 118-34. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2007.12.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jiang X, Shen C, Rey-Ladino J, Yu H, Brunham RC: Characterization of murine dendritic cell line JAWS II and primary bone marrow-derived dendritic cells in Chlamydia muridarum antigen presentation and induction of protective immunity. Infect Immun. 2008, 76: 2392-401. 10.1128/IAI.01584-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Awasthi S, Cropper J: Immunophenotype and functions of fetal baboon bone-marrow derived dendritic cells. Cell Immunol. 2006, 240: 31-40. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2006.06.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daugelat S, Ladel CH, Kaufmann SH: Influence of mouse strain and vaccine viability on T-cell responses induced by Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin. Infect Immun. 1995, 63: 2033-40.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gemmell E, Winning TA, Grieco DA, Bird PS, Seymour GJ: The influence of genetic variation on the splenic T cell cytokine and specific serum antibody responses to Porphyromonas gingivalis in mice. J Periodontol. 2000, 71: 1130-8. 10.1902/jop.2000.71.7.1130.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gemmell E, Sernia C, Grieco DA, Bird PS, Allen CJ, Seymour GJ: Genetic variation in the recognition of Porphyromonas gingivalis antigens in mice. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2001, 16: 129-35. 10.1034/j.1399-302x.2001.016003129.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baumjohann D, Lutz MB: Non-invasive imaging of dendritic cell migration in vivo. Immunobiology. 2006, 211: 587-97. 10.1016/j.imbio.2006.05.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Celli S, Breart B, Bousso P: Intravital two-photon imaging of natural killer cells and dendritic cells in lymph nodes. Methods Mol Biol. 2008, 415: 119-26. full_text.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Celli S, Garcia Z, Beuneu H, Bousso P: Decoding the dynamics of T cell-dendritic cell interactions in vivo. Immunol Rev. 2008, 221: 182-7. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00588.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pham W, Kobukai S, Hotta C, Gore JC: Dendritic cells: therapy and imaging. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2009, 9: 539-64. 10.1517/14712590902867739.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Narsinh KH, Cao F, Wu JC: Molecular imaging of human embryonic stem cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2009, 515: 13-32. full_text.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waerzeggers Y, Klein M, Miletic H, Himmelreich U, Li H, Monfared P, Herrlinger U, Hoehn M, Coenen HH, Weller M, Winkeler A, Jacobs AH: Multimodal imaging of neural progenitor cell fate in rodents. Mol Imaging. 2008, 7: 77-91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miyagawa T, Gogiberidze G, Serganova I, Cai S, Balatoni JA, Thaler HT, Ageyeva L, Pillarsetty N, Finn RD, Blasberg RG: Imaging of HSV-tk Reporter gene expression: comparison between [18F]FEAU, [18F]FFEAU, and other imaging probes. J Nucl Med. 2008, 49: 637-48. 10.2967/jnumed.107.046227.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Doubrovin MM, Doubrovina ES, Zanzonico P, Sadelain M, Larson SM, O'Reilly RJ: In vivo imaging and quantitation of adoptively transferred human antigen-specific T cells transduced to express a human norepinephrine transporter gene. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 11959-69. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1250.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kang TH, Lee JH, Noh KH, Han HD, Shin BC, Choi EY, Peng S, Hung CF, Wu TC, Kim TW: Enhancing dendritic cell vaccine potency by combining a BAK/BAX siRNA-mediated antiapoptotic strategy to prolong dendritic cell life with an intracellular strategy to target antigen to lysosomal compartments. Int J Cancer. 2007, 120: 1696-703. 10.1002/ijc.22377.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peng S, Kim TW, Lee JH, Yang M, He L, Hung CF, Wu TC: Vaccination with dendritic cells transfected with BAK and BAX siRNA enhances antigen-specific immune responses by prolonging dendritic cell life. Hum Gene Ther. 2005, 16: 584-93. 10.1089/hum.2005.16.584.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen M, Huang L, Shabier Z, Wang J: Regulation of the lifespan in dendritic cell subsets. Mol Immunol. 2007, 44: 2558-65. 10.1016/j.molimm.2006.12.020.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ahlers JD, Belyakov IM: Memories that last forever: strategies for optimizing vaccine T cell memory. Blood. 2009, 115: 1678-89. 10.1182/blood-2009-06-227546.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wakim LM, Waithman J, van Rooijen N, Heath WR, Carbone FR: Dendritic cell-induced memory T cell activation in nonlymphoid tissues. Science. 2008, 319: 198-202. 10.1126/science.1151869.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ampel NM, Nelson DK, Chavez S, Naus KA, Herman AB, Li L, Simmons KA, Pappagianis D: Preliminary evaluation of whole-blood gamma interferon release for clinical assessment of cellular immunity in patients with active coccidioidomycosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005, 12: 700-4.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lutz MB, Kukutsch N, Ogilvie AL, Rossner S, Koch F, Romani N, Schuler G: An advanced culture method for generating large quantities of highly pure dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow. J Immunol Methods. 1999, 223: 77-92. 10.1016/S0022-1759(98)00204-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yaghoubi SS, Gambhir SS: Measuring herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase reporter gene expression in vitro. Nat Protoc. 2006, 1: 2137-42. 10.1038/nprot.2006.334.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kang KW, Min JJ, Chen X, Gambhir SS: Comparison of [14C]FMAU, [3H]FEAU, [14C]FIAU, and [3H]PCV for monitoring reporter gene expression of wild type and mutant herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase in cell culture. Mol Imaging Biol. 2005, 7: 296-303. 10.1007/s11307-005-0010-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choi SR, Zhuang ZP, Chacko AM, Acton PD, Tjuvajev-Gelovani J, Doubrovin M, Chu DC, Kung HF: SPECT imaging of herpes simplex virus type1 thymidine kinase gene expression by [(123)I]FIAU(1). Acad Radiol. 2005, 12: 798-805. 10.1016/j.acra.2005.04.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.