Mesenchymal stromal (stem) cells suppress pro-inflammatory cytokine production but fail to improve survival in experimental staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome
- Hani Kim1,
- Ilyse Darwish3,
- Maria-Fernanda Monroy4,
- Darwin J Prockop5,
- W Conrad Liles†1, 2, 6 and
- Kevin C Kain†1, 2Email author
© Kim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 25 October 2013
Accepted: 10 January 2014
Published: 14 January 2014
Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) is caused by an overwhelming host-mediated response to bacterial superantigens produced mainly by Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes. TSS is characterized by aberrant activation of T cells and excessive release of pro-inflammatory cytokines ultimately resulting in capillary leak, septic shock, multiple organ dysfunction and high mortality rates. No therapeutic or vaccine has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for TSS, and novel therapeutic strategies to improve clinical outcome are needed. Mesenchymal stromal (stem) cells (MSCs) are stromal cells capable of self-renewal and differentiation. Moreover, MSCs have immunomodulatory properties, including profound effects on activities of T cells and macrophages in specific contexts. Based on the critical role of host-derived immune mediators in TSS, we hypothesized that MSCs could modulate the host-derived proinflammatory response triggered by Staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) and improve survival in experimental TSS.
Effects of MSCs on proinflammatory cytokines in peripheral blood were measured in wild-type C57BL/6 mice injected with 50 μg of SEB. Effects of MSCs on survival were monitored in fatal experimental TSS induced by consecutive doses of D-galactosamine (10 mg) and SEB (10 μg) in HLA-DR4 transgenic mice.
Despite significantly decreasing serum levels of IL-2, IL-6 and TNF induced by SEB in wild-type mice, human MSCs failed to improve survival in experimental TSS in HLA-DR4 transgenic mice. Similarly, a previously described downstream mediator of human MSCs, TNF-stimulated gene 6 (TSG-6), did not significantly improve survival in experimental TSS. Furthermore, murine MSCs, whether unstimulated or pre-treated with IFNγ, failed to improve survival in experimental TSS.
Our results suggest that the immunomodulatory effects of MSCs are insufficient to rescue mice from experimental TSS, and that mediators other than IL-2, IL-6 and TNF are likely to play critical mechanistic roles in the pathogenesis of experimental TSS.
Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) is a potentially fatal disease characterized by systemic capillary leak, commonly associated with hypoalbuminaemia, edema, hypotension, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome . TSS is induced by exposure to bacterial superantigens produced predominantly by Gram-positive cocci, especially Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes[1, 2]. Conventional antigens are processed by antigen presenting cells (APC) into small peptides and presented within the MHC class II molecule on the surface of APCs to T cells. As a result, only a small fraction (<0.01%) of host T cell clones become activated . In contrast, superantigens bypass antigen processing and bind directly to MHC class II/T cell receptor as whole antigens, activating up to 25% of total T cells in the host [1, 3]. This results in excessive and uncoordinated production and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF, IL-6, IFNγ, IL-2, and ΙL-1β, which have been implicated in the pathogenesis of TSS [4–7], including capillary leak, septic shock, multiple organ dysfunction and death.
While several experimental therapeutics are being investigated, none has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of TSS. As a result, mortality remains high especially in streptococcal TSS (30-50% mortality) compared to staphylococcal TSS (5-10% mortality) [8–10]. In addition, multiple potential routes of exposure, including epithelial surfaces, intestinal mucosa and inhalation, make superantigens a candidate for use in biological warfare . Current clinical management for TSS mainly involves supportive therapy incorporating fluid resuscitation and vasopressors, and appropriate antibiotics . Overall, there is an urgent need for a therapeutic strategy that targets the pathological process of TSS.
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are a heterogenous subset of non-hematopoietic pluripotent stromal cells that can differentiate into multiple cell types of mesenchymal lineage (i.e., osteoblasts, chondroblasts and adipocytes) . MSCs have been reported to improve tissue injury arising from multiple causes, including sepsis, acute renal failure, acute myocardial infarction and acute lung injury [13–16]. While the beneficial effects of MSCs were initially attributed to their pluripotency, the contribution of MSCs to tissue repair through engraftment and transdifferentiation into functionally relevant tissues remains unclear . Increasing evidence indicates that MSCs can exert profound immunomodulatory effects that contribute mechanistically to the attenuation of tissue injury via suppression of immune effector cells, including T cells and macrophages, resulting in decreased production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines [18–22].
Based on the critical role played by the host immune response in the pathogenesis of TSS, we hypothesized that MSCs would decrease inflammation and improve survival in experimental TSS. Human MSCs significantly reduced the serum levels of IL-2, IL-6 and TNF, triggered by SEB in wild-type mice, while IFNγ was unaffected by hMSCs. Importantly, MSCs either human or mouse failed to improve survival in experimental TSS suggesting that their immunosuppressive effects are insufficient to reduce mortality in this model.
SEB and D-(+)-galactosamine hydrochlorde (D-gal) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (Oakville, ON, Canada). Recombinant human TSG-6 (rhTSG-6) was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). rhTSG-6 (30 μg/mouse) was administered to mice one hour prior to the D-gal injection.
Wild-type male 8–10 week old C57BL/6 mice (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA) were used for the measurement of cytokines after SEB injection. For all survival analyses, 8–10 week old male C57BL/6 mice transgenic for HLA-DR4 (Taconic Farms, Inc., New York, NY, USA) were used .
TSS was induced in mice transgenic for HLA-DR4 by intraperitoneal injection of 10 mg of D-(+)-galactosamine hydrochlorde (Sigma-Aldrich Canada Ltd., Oakville, ON, Canada) followed, 1 hour later, by intraperitoneal injection of SEB (10 μg/mouse, Sigma-Aldrich Canada Ltd., Oakville, ON, Canada) . Mice were monitored every 30 minutes during the first 5 hours, and continually once lethargy became apparent and progressive, at which time the mice were euthanized.
All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care Guidelines, and were approved by the Toronto General Hospital Animal Care Committee at the University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Frozen vials of murine MSCs (mMSCs) and human MSCs (hMSCs) were obtained from the Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine Institute for Regenerative Medicine at Scott & White (Temple, TX, USA), under the auspices of a National Institutes of Health/National Centre for Research Resources (NIH/NCRR) grant (#P40RR017447). All MSCs were reported by the Center as meeting MSC- defining criteria proposed by the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) . mMSCs (isolated from male C57BL/6 mice) were thawed and plated for 24 hours in Complete Growth Media (i.e., α-MEM without ribonucleosides or deoxyribonucleosides and supplemented with antibiotics, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Atlanta Biologicals, Miami, FL, USA) and 10% horse serum (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA)). hMSCs (isolated from a 24 year old male donor) were thawed and plated for 24 hours in α-MEM, without ribonucleosides or deoxyribonucleosides, supplemented with 2mM L-glutamine, penicillin and streptomycin and 16.5% FBS. After 24 hours, mMSCs or hMSCs were trypsinized and re-plated at 60 cells/cm2. mMSCs/hMSCs were incubated for each subsequent passage until they reached 70% confluency. Passage 6 (P6) mMSCs or Passage 3 (P3) hMSCs were washed and resuspended in PBS. 2.5 × 105 hMSCs or mMSCs or PBS alone was administered into mice intravenously via tail vein one hour prior to induction of TSS (hMSCs, mMSCs) or three hours after induction of TSS (mMSCs). For ex-vivo IFNγ pre-treatment of mMSCs, mMSCs were incubated in complete growth media containing 100 U/ml of mouse recombinant IFNγ for 3 hours, washed and resuspended in PBS before being injected into mice one hour before induction of TSS.
MSCs were differentiated into adipocytes, osteocytes and chondrocytes using the Mouse MSC Functional Identification kit for murine MSCs (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and StemPro Differentiation Kit (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for human MSCs according to the manufacturers’ protocols. Briefly, MSCs were cultured in 12-well plates in α-MEM containing 20% FBS (Atlanta Biologicals, Miami, FL, USA), L-glutamine, penicillin and streptomycin until they reached 100% confluency for adipocytic differentiation, and 50-70% confluency for osteocytic and chondrocytic differentiation. MSCs were cultured in adipogenic, osteogenic or chondrogenic media for 7 – 21 days before being prepared for lineage-specific stains. Adipocytic differentiation was confirmed by staining with Oil Red O (Sigma-Aldrich Canada Ltd., Oakville, ON, Canada) as previously described . Briefly, cells were washed with PBS and fixed in 10% formalin for 45 minutes. Fixed cells were incubated in 60% isopropanol for 5 minutes before being incubated in a freshly prepared Oil Red O solution for 15 minutes. Differentiation to osteocytes was confirmed by Alizarin Red S staining (Sigma-Aldrich Canada Ltd., Oakville, ON, Canada) . Cells were washed and fixed as described above. Fixed cells were stained with 2% Alizarin Red S solution (w/v, pH4.2) for 20 minutes. For chondrocytic differentiation, spheroids of 3×105 MSCs were allowed to form overnight in α-MEM media containing FBS, L-glutamine and antibiotics in 15mL conical polypropylene tubes. After being incubated in chondrogenic differentiation media for 21 days, each spheroid in 200 μl media was transferred to a cytospin sample chamber (Thermo Scientific, Mississauga, ON, Canada) attached to a glass slide, and centrifuged at 800 RPM for 10 minutes. The cells on glass slides were washed with PBS and fixed in 10% formalin for 1 hour before being incubated with 0.03% (w/v) Alcian Blue 8 GX (Sigma-Aldrich Canada Ltd., Oakville, ON, Canada) prepared in 60% ethanol and 40% acetic acid. After being stained overnight, cells were washed in destaining solution containing 60% ethanol and 40% acetic acid. Images of the stained cytospins were obtained by using a digital camera. Microscopic images of the stained chondrocytes were obtained by using a phase contrast microscope (oil immersion, magnification ×100).
Serum cytokine measurement
Wild-type C57BL/6 mice were injected with 50 μg of SEB, and serum was collected 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours later via cardiac puncture. Serum levels of IL-2, IL-6, TNF and IFNγ were measured by specific ELISAs (for IL-2 and IL-6, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA; for TNF and IFNγ, eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA).
Statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism software (LaJolla, CA, USA). Statistical significance for survival studies was assessed by the log-rank test. Comparison of two groups at multiple time-points was performed by 2-Way ANOVA, and for a single time-point, by Mann–Whitney. In all cases, a p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Administration of hMSCs suppresses proinflammatory cytokine production induced by SEB in vivo
Administration of hMSCs fails to improve survival in an experimental model of fatal staphylococcal TSS
MSCs can either stimulate or suppress host immune response depending on the host cytokine environment [19, 32]. Therefore, we hypothesized that the administration of a known immune mediator produced by hMSCs would enable us to directly assess the immune-modulatory effects of this therapy independent of the host cytokine environment. TNF-stimulated gene 6 (TSG-6) is an anti-inflammatory glycoprotein that was shown to mediate the therapeutic effects of hMSCs in the animal models of myocardial infarction and zymosan-induced mouse peritonitis [15, 33]. Therefore, we tested whether i.v. injections of human recombinant TSG-6 could improve survival in our TSS model. Human and mouse TSG-6 proteins share 92% sequence identity, and human recombinant TSG-6 has been shown to inhibit TNF expression in mouse macrophages in a co-culture experiment, and reduce inflammatory response and infarct size in a mouse model of myocardial infarction .
Both PBS-treated and TSG-6-treated groups showed 80-90% lethality with the median survival of 6.76 hours, and there was no statistically significant difference between these groups (Figure 3B).
Administration of mMSCs also fails to improve survival in an experimental model of fatal staphylococcal TSS
Given the importance of IFNγ in eliciting an immunosuppressive phenotype of MSCs, we also investigated whether pre-treatment of mMSCs ex vivo with IFNγ prior to their injection into mice could improve survival. A previous study demonstrated that 100 U/ml of IFNγ represents a threshold above which mMSCs switch from an antigen-presenting phenotype to an immunosuppressive phenotype . Therefore, we treated mMSCs with 100 U/mL of mouse IFNγ for 3 hours before harvesting them for injections. While there was a trend of increased median survival, this difference failed to reach statistical significance (Figure 5B).
This study used an experimental model to investigate the therapeutic potential of MSCs for TSS. We show that hMSCs suppressed circulating serum levels of IL-2, IL-6 and TNF induced by SEB, but not that of IFNγ. However, the immunomodulatory effect of hMSCs was insufficient to confer a survival benefit in a murine model of fatal TSS. Consistent with this finding, a downstream mediator produced by hMSCs, TSG-6, also failed to improve survival in experimental TSS. mMSCs were similarly incapable of improving survival even when pre-treated with IFNγ, which is thought to promote the immunosuppressive phenotype of MSCs . Collectively, our data suggest that MSCs are unlikely to provide a therapeutic benefit against TSS despite their immune suppression of at least some of the implicated mediators of TSS.
Several novel treatment strategies for TSS have been proposed and are under investigation. Firstly, inhibiting the interaction of superantigens with the T cell receptor and MHC II has been explored by using peptide mimetics of superantigens [35, 36], protein chimeras of the binding sites of superantigens , and nucleic acid aptamers which specifically bind superantigens . Secondly, inhibitors have been developed against the key mediators of pro-inflammatory intracellular signaling pathways or pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines themselves [39–44]. Some of the experimental therapeutics have been previously approved by the FDA for other indications, receiving particular attention especially for biodefence purposes (e.g. rapamycin, dexamethasone, pentoxifylline) [42–45]. Finally, proof of concept of neutralizing superantigens by intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) has been demonstrated, and different recombinant antibodies are being investigated for their neutralizing potential although challenges remain with consistent neutralization of different superantigens [2, 46–49].
The capacity of MSCs to suppress immune effector cells such as macrophages and T cells and their secreted mediators, as well as the relative ease of the isolation of MSCs from bone marrow, have brought much attention to the potential therapeutic application of MSCs to a range of human diseases. Among different models of diseases, therapeutic benefits of MSCs have mostly been reported in mouse models of acute lung injury and sepsis [16, 18, 22, 27]. In these studies, administration of MSCs, either alone or with an antibiotic, improved survival and organ dysfunction, which was associated with reduced levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF, IL-6), chemokines, (e.g., CXCL2, CCL5 and KC/IL-8) in the peripheral blood and/or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid [16, 18, 22]. Our observation that hMSCs can suppress IL-2, IL-6 and TNF but not IFNγ is consistent with a previous finding in which administration of mMSCs reduced serum levels of IL-6 and TNF but not that of IFNγ in a cecal ligation and puncture model of sepsis .
Of note, the observed immunosuppressive effects on IL-2, IL-6 and TNF were not associated with an improved survival in experimental TSS in our study. There are several possible explanations for this observation. First, the difference in the host immune environment in the two models used for monitoring cytokine levels and for monitoring survival may result in a difference in the immunomodulatory properties of MSCs. MSCs are known to be highly sensitive to the host immune environment that can promote either an antigen presentation phenotype or alternatively, an immunosuppressive phenotype . In our study, cytokine measurements were determined in wild-type C57BL/6 mice, in which only SEB was used to trigger TSS-like host immune response whereas the survival outcome was monitored in a lethal model of TSS, which required a sensitizing agent, D-gal, in addition to SEB.
It is possible that in the lethal model of TSS, the host immune environment is not optimal for inducing the immunosuppressive properties of hMSCs as in the non-lethal wild-type model. Alternatively, the lack of improvement in survival despite the partial immunosuppression by hMSCs may suggest that the hMSC-mediated immunosuppression does not affect the critical pathways and mediators for TSS-associated lethality. This latter hypothesis is supported by a recent report in which a neutralizing antibody against IFNγ significantly improved survival in SEB-induced TSS in HLA-DR3 mice, and the improved survival was associated with a reduction in the serum levels of chemokines, RANTES (CCL5) and KC (mouse CXCL1) . Furthermore, in several earlier studies, therapeutic strategies that improved survival against experimental TSS were associated with suppression of IFNγ [41–43]. In our study, the suppressive effects of hMSCs were limited to IL-2, IL-6 and TNF, with no effect on IFNγ. The lack of effect of MSCs on IFNγ has also been observed by Nemeth et al. in a study where mMSCs significantly improved survival against experimental sepsis by reducing serum levels of TNF, and IL-6, but not IFNγ . Previous findings by Tilahun et al. and others suggest that targeting IFNγ and its downstream mediators (e.g. CCL5, CXCL1) may be crucial in conferring a significant protection against experimental TSS [34, 41–43].
There are limitations to our study. As an experimental model of human TSS, the HLA-DR4 transgenic mouse model requires D-gal as a sensitizing agent which induces an acute response that shares some but not all features of human TSS. A more recent model reported by Tilahun et al. uses HLA-DR3 transgenic mice in which lethality is induced without the need of a sensitizing agent , however, these mice are not commercially available. Directly correlating the immunomodulatory effects of MSCs with survival requires a time-course study examining cytokine levels in the lethal model used. However, there were technical constraints to sample appropriate numbers of animals given the rapidity of death in this model. Moreover, due to the requirement for a sensitizing agent in our model, we postulated that determining the effects of MSCs on SEB-mediated host immune response in the absence D-gal in the wild-type mice would be more relevant to understanding the immunomodulatory effects of MSCs on SEB-mediated TSS. Lastly, our study did not examine the effects of MSCs in experimental TSS induced by a Gram-positive bacterial strain, which may be more relevant to human TSS. Future studies assessing the effects of MSCs on TSS induced by Gram-positive bacterial strains in the HLA-DR3 model may provide additional insight into the immunomodulatory effects of MSCs on TSS.
The exact mechanism underlying the immunosuppressive effects of MSCs is poorly understood. Each infection state is characterized by distinct cytokine milieu that is dynamically regulated throughout the course of infection and is likely to influence whether MSCs can function as immunosuppressors in a given model. For instance, despite their capacity to suppress T cell proliferation in vitro, MSCs failed to improve clinical outcomes that are primarily mediated by T-cells in vivo in the models of heart transplant, graft versus host disease and collagen induced arthritis [50–52]. Similarly, hMSCs or mMSCs failed to improve survival in a murine model of severe influenza . Indeed, in some cases, in vivo administration of MSCs was associated with increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and poorer clinical outcome, depending on the dose and the time of administration [50, 51]. In assessing therapeutic potential of MSCs, our present findings along with others, underscore the importance of elucidating the molecular targets of MSCs in a particular disease context, and their relevance to the pathogenesis of the disease.
In summary, our data suggest that MSCs are unlikely to provide a therapeutic benefit for TSS. While MSCs can suppress some mediators of TSS, their immune suppressive capacity against TSS may be too limited quantitatively (i.e., duration and extent of suppression) and/or qualitatively (i.e. failure to suppress the critical mediators of TSS) to significantly alter the clinical outcome.
Mesenchymal stromal (stem) cells
Toxic shock syndrome
Staphylococcal enterotoxin B
Major histocompatibility complex
Antigen presenting cells
D-(+)-galactosamine hydrochlorde (D-gal)
Tumor necrosis factor
This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-13721 and MOP-115160 [KCK], Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency grant 58217-LS-DRP [KCK], and Canada Research Chairs in Molecular Parasitology [KCK] and Infectious Diseases and Inflammation [WCL]. The funding source had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.
- Llewelyn M, Cohen J: Superantigens: microbial agents that corrupt immunity. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002, 2 (3): 156-162. 10.1016/S1473-3099(02)00222-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Krakauer T, Stiles BG: The staphylococcal enterotoxin (SE) family: SEB and siblings. Virulence. 2013, 4 (7): 1-15.Google Scholar
- Choi Y, Lafferty JA, Clements JR, Todd JK, Gelfand EW, Kappler J: Selective expansion of T cells expressing V beta 2 in toxic shock syndrome. J Exp Med. 1990, 172 (3): 981-984. 10.1084/jem.172.3.981.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chatila T, Geha R: Signal transduction by microbial superantigens via MHC class II molecules. Immunol Rev. 1993, 131: 43-59. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.1993.tb01529.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marrack P, Blackman M, Kushnir E, Kappler J: The toxicity of staphylococcal enterotoxin B in mice is mediated by T cells. J Exp Med. 1990, 171 (2): 455-464. 10.1084/jem.171.2.455.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Faulkner L, Cooper A, Fantino C, Altmann DM, Sriskandan S: The mechanism of superantigen-mediated toxic shock: not a simple Th1 cytokine storm. J Immunol. 2005, 175 (10): 6870-6877.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miethke T, Wahl C, Heeg K, Echtenacher B, Krammer PH, Wagner H: T cell-mediated lethal shock triggered in mice by the superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin B: critical role of tumor necrosis factor. J Exp Med. 1992, 175 (1): 91-98. 10.1084/jem.175.1.91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hajjeh R, Reingold A, Weil A, Shutt K, Schuchat A, Perkins B: Toxic shock syndrome in the United States: surveillance update, 1979 1996. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999, 5 (6): 807-810. 10.3201/eid0506.990611.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McCormick J, Yarwood J, Schlievert P: Toxic shock syndrome and bacterial superantigens: an update. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001, 55: 77-104. 10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.77.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stevens D: The toxic shock syndromes. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1996, 10 (4): 727-746. 10.1016/S0891-5520(05)70324-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Madsen J: Toxins as weapons of mass destruction: a comparison and contrast with biological-warfare and chemical-warfare agents. Clin Lab Med. 2001, 21 (3): 593-605.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Friedenstein A, Petrakova K, Kurolesova A, Frolova G: Heterotopic of bone marrow: analysis of precursor cells for osteogenic and hematopoietic tissues. Transplantation. 1968, 6 (2): 239-247.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rojas M, Xu J, Woods CR, Mora AL, Spears W, Roman J: Bone marrow- derived mesenchymal stem cells in repair of the injured lung. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2005, 33 (2): 145-152. 10.1165/rcmb.2004-0330OC.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ortiz LA, Gambelli F, McBride C, Gaupp D, Baddoo M, Kaminski N: Mesenchymal stem cell engraftment in lung is enhanced in response to bleomycin exposure and ameliorates its fibrotic effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003, 100 (14): 8407-8411. 10.1073/pnas.1432929100.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee RH, Pulin AA, Seo MJ, Kota DJ, Ylostalo J, Larson BL: Intravenous hMSCs improve myocardial infarction in mice because cells embolized in lung are activated to secrete the anti-inflammatory protein TSG-6. Cell Stem Cell. 2009, 5 (1): 54-63. 10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gupta N, Su X, Popov B, Lee JW, Serikov V, Matthay MA: Intrapulmonary delivery of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells improves survival and attenuates endotoxin-induced acute lung injury in mice. J Immunol. 2007, 179 (3): 1855-1863.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Phinney DG, Prockop DJ: Concise review: Mesenchymal stem/multipotent stromal cells: the state of transdifferentiation and modes of tissue repair—current views. Stem Cells. 2007, 25 (11): 2896-2902. 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0637.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nemeth K, Leelahavanichkul A, Yuen PST, Mayer B, Parmelee A, Doi K: Bone marrow stromal cells attenuate sepsis via prostaglandin E2-dependent reprogramming of host macrophages to increase their interleukin-10 production. Nat Med. 2009, 15 (1): 42-49. 10.1038/nm.1905.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Auletta JJ, Deans RJ, Bartholomew AM: Emerging roles for multipotent, bone marrow derived stromal cells in host defense. Blood. 2012, 119 (8): 1801-1809. 10.1182/blood-2011-10-384354.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roddy GW, Oh JY, Lee RH, Bartosh TJ, Ylostalo J, Coble K: Action at a distance: systemically administered adult stem/progenitor cells (MSCs) reduce inflammatory damage to the cornea without engraftment and primarily by secretion of TNF-α stimulated gene/protein 6. Stem Cells. 2011, 29 (10): 1572-1579. 10.1002/stem.708.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ren G, Zhang L, Zhao X, Xu G, Zhang Y, Roberts AI: Mesenchymal stem cell-mediated immunosuppression occurs via concerted action of chemokines and nitric oxide. Cell Stem Cell. 2008, 2 (2): 141-150. 10.1016/j.stem.2007.11.014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mei SHJ, Haitsma JJ, Santos Dos CC, Deng Y, Lai PFH, Slutsky AS: Mesenchymal stem cells reduce inflammation while enhancing bacterial clearance and improving survival in sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010, 182 (8): 1047-1057. 10.1164/rccm.201001-0010OC.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ito K, Bian H, Molina M, Han J, Magram J, Saar E: HLA-DR4-IE chimeric class II transgenic, murine class II-deficient mice are susceptible to experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. J Exp Med. 1996, 183 (6): 2635-2644. 10.1084/jem.183.6.2635.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chau TA, McCully ML, Brintnell W, An G, Kasper KJ, Vines ED: Toll-like receptor 2 ligands on the staphylococcal cell wall downregulate superantigen-induced T cell activation and prevent toxic shock syndrome. Nat Med. 2009, 15 (6): 641-648. 10.1038/nm.1965.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dominici M, Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D: Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006, 8 (4): 315-317. 10.1080/14653240600855905.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reger R, Tucker A, Wolfe M: Differentiation and Characterization of Human MSCs. Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Methods and Protocols. Edited by: Prockop D, Phinney D, Bunnell B. 2008, Totowa: Humana PressGoogle Scholar
- Mei S, McCarter S, Deng Y, Parker C, Liles W, Stewart D: Prevention of LPS-induced acute lung injury in mice by mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing angiopoietin 1. PLoS Med. 2007, 4 (9): e269-10.1371/journal.pmed.0040269.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huzella LM, Buckley MJ, Alves DA, Stiles BG, Krakauer T: Central roles for IL-2 and MCP-1 following intranasal exposure to SEB: a new mouse model. Res Vet Sci. 2009, 86 (2): 241-247. 10.1016/j.rvsc.2008.07.020.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stiles BG, Bavari S, Krakauer T, Ulrich RG: Toxicity of staphylococcal enterotoxins potentiated by lipopolysaccharide: major histocompatibility complex class II molecule dependency and cytokine release. Infect Immun. 1993, 61 (12): 5333-5338.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Beno DW, Uhing MR, Jiyamapa-Serna VA, Goto M, Chen Y, Vasan A: Differential induction of hepatic dysfunction after intraportal and intravenous challenge with endotoxin and staphylococcal enterotoxin B. Shock. 2003, 19 (4): 352-357. 10.1097/00024382-200304000-00010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rajagopalan G, Sen MM, Singh M, Murali NS, Nath KA, Iijima K: Intranasal exposure to staphylococcal enterotoxin B elicits an acute systemic inflammatory response. Shock. 2006, 25 (6): 647-656. 10.1097/01.shk.0000209565.92445.7d.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chan JL, Tang KC, Patel AP, Bonilla LM, Pierobon N, Ponzio NM: Antigen-presenting property of mesenchymal stem cells occurs during a narrow window at low levels of interferon-gamma. Blood. 2006, 107 (12): 4817-4824. 10.1182/blood-2006-01-0057.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Choi H, Lee RH, Bazhanov N, Oh JY, Prockop DJ: Anti-inflammatory protein TSG-6 secreted by activated MSCs attenuates zymosan-induced mouse peritonitis by decreasing TLR2/NF-kappa B signaling in resident macrophages. Blood. 2011, 118 (2): 330-338. 10.1182/blood-2010-12-327353.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tilahun A, Holz M, Wu T, David C, Rajagopalan G: Interferon gamma-dependent intestinal pathology contributes to the lethality in bacterial superantigen-induced toxic shock syndrome. PLoS One. 2011, 6 (2): e16764-10.1371/journal.pone.0016764.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arad G, Levy R, Hillman D, Kaempfer R: Superantigen antagonist protects against lethal shock and defines a new domain for T-cell activation. Nat Med. 2000, 6 (4): 414-421. 10.1038/74672.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Visvanathan K, Charles A, Bannan J, Pugach P, Kashfi K, Zabriskie JB: Inhibition of bacterial superantigens by peptides and antibodies. Infect Immun. 2001, 69 (2): 875-884. 10.1128/IAI.69.2.875-884.2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hong-Geller E, Mollhoff M, Shiflett PR, Gupta G: Design of chimeric receptor mimics with different TcRVbeta isoforms Type-specific inhibition of superantigen pathogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279 (7): 5676-5684.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- DeGrasse JA: A single-stranded DNA aptamer that selectively binds to staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (3): e33410-10.1371/journal.pone.0033410.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu D, Acharya HP, Yu M, Wang J, Yeh VS, Kang S: Total synthesis of the marine alkaloid halichlorine: development and use of a general route to chiral piperidines. J Org Chem. 2009, 74 (19): 7417-7428. 10.1021/jo901481n.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kissner TL, Moisan L, Mann E, Alam S, Ruthel G, Ulrich RG: A small molecule that mimics the BB-loop in the Toll interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor domain of MyD88 attenuates staphylococcal enterotoxin B-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine production and toxicity in mice. J Biol Chem. 2011, 286 (36): 31385-31396. 10.1074/jbc.M110.204982.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Krakauer T, Buckley M, Issaq HJ, Fox SD: Rapamycin protects mice from staphylococcal enterotoxin B-induced toxic shock and blocks cytokine release in vitro and in vivo. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010, 54 (3): 1125-1131. 10.1128/AAC.01015-09.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Krakauer T, Buckley MJ, Huzella LM, Alves DA: Critical timing, location and duration of glucocorticoid administration rescue mice from superantigen-induced shock and attenuate lung injury. Int Immunopharmacol. 2009, 9 (10): 1168-1174. 10.1016/j.intimp.2009.06.004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Krakauer T, Buckley M: Dexamethasone attenuates staphylococcal enterotoxin B-induced hypothermic response and protects mice from superantigen-induced toxic shock. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006, 50 (1): 391-395. 10.1128/AAC.50.1.391-395.2006.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Krakauer T, Stiles BG: Pentoxifylline inhibits superantigen-induced toxic shock and cytokine release. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999, 6 (4): 594-598.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Krakauer T: Inhibition of toxic shock syndrome toxin-1-induced cytokine production and T cell activation by interleukin-10, interleukin-4, and dexamethasone. J Infect Dis. 1995, 172 (4): 988-992. 10.1093/infdis/172.4.988.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Larkin EA, Stiles BG, Ulrich RG: Inhibition of toxic shock by human monoclonal antibodies against staphylococcal enterotoxin B. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (10): e13253-10.1371/journal.pone.0013253.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kaul R, McGeer A, Norrby-Teglund A, Kotb M, Schwartz B, O'Rourke K: Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for streptococcal toxic shock syndrome–Comparative Observational Study. Clin Infect Dis. 1999, 28 (4): 800-807. 10.1086/515199.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Darenberg J, Ihendyane N, Sjolin J, Aufwerber E, Haidl S, Follin P: Intravenous immunoglobulin G therapy in streptococcal toxic shock syndrome: a European randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2003, 37 (3): 333-340. 10.1086/376630.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Darenberg J, Soderquist B, Henriques Normark B, Norrby-Teglund A: Differences in potency of intravenous polyspecific immunoglobulin G against streptococcal and staphylococcal superantigens: implications for therapy of toxic shock syndrome. Clin Infect Dis. 2004, 38 (6): 836-842. 10.1086/381979.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Inoue S, Popp FC, Koehl GE, Piso P, Schlitt HJ, Geissler EK: Immunomodulatory effects of mesenchymal stem cells in a rat organ transplant model. Transplantation. 2006, 81 (11): 1589-1595. 10.1097/01.tp.0000209919.90630.7b.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Djouad F, Fritz V, Apparailly F, Louis-Plence P, Bony C, Sany J: Reversal of the immunosuppressive properties of mesenchymal stem cells by tumor necrosis factor alpha in collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005, 52 (5): 1595-1603. 10.1002/art.21012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sudres M, Norol F, Trenado A, Gregoire S, Charlotte F, Levacher B: Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells suppress lymphocyte proliferation in vitro but fail to prevent graft-versus-host disease in mice. J Immunol. 2006, 176 (12): 7761-7767.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Darwish I, Banner D, Mubareka S, Kim H, Besla R, Kelvin DJ: Mesenchymal stromal (stem) cell therapy fails to improve outcomes in experimental severe influenza. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (8): e71761-10.1371/journal.pone.0071761.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.