Residue analysis of a CTL epitope of SARS-CoV spike protein by IFN-gamma production and bioinformatics prediction
© Huang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 23 April 2012
Accepted: 31 August 2012
Published: 10 September 2012
Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is an emerging infectious disease caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV. The T cell epitopes of the SARS CoV spike protein are well known, but no systematic evaluation of the functional and structural roles of each residue has been reported for these antigenic epitopes. Analysis of the functional importance of side-chains by mutational study may exaggerate the effect by imposing a structural disturbance or an unusual steric, electrostatic or hydrophobic interaction.
We demonstrated that N50 could induce significant IFN-gamma response from SARS-CoV S DNA immunized mice splenocytes by the means of ELISA, ELISPOT and FACS. Moreover, S366-374 was predicted to be an optimal epitope by bioinformatics tools: ANN, SMM, ARB and BIMAS, and confirmed by IFN-gamma response induced by a series of S358-374-derived peptides. Furthermore, each of S366-374 was replaced by alanine (A), lysine (K) or aspartic acid (D), respectively. ANN was used to estimate the binding affinity of single S366-374 mutants to H-2 Kd. Y367 and L374 were predicated to possess the most important role in peptide binding. Additionally, these one residue mutated peptides were synthesized, and IFN-gamma production induced by G368, V369, A371, T372 and K373 mutated S366-374 were decreased obviously.
We demonstrated that S366-374 is an optimal H-2 Kd CTL epitope in the SARS CoV S protein. Moreover, Y367, S370, and L374 are anchors in the epitope, while C366, G368, V369, A371, T372, and K373 may directly interact with TCR on the surface of CD8-T cells.
KeywordsSARS-CoV CTL Epitope Residue
Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is an emerging infectious disease caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV[1, 2]. The fatality rate is as high as 15% for patients younger than 60 years old and can be higher than 50% for patients 60 years or older. Nearly 40% of infected patients develop respiratory failure that requires assistant ventilation.
Coronaviruses (CoVs) are positive-strand RNA viruses. The virion consists of a nucleocapsid (N) core surrounded by an envelope containing three membrane proteins, spike (S), membrane (M) and envelope (E), which are common to all members of the genus[4, 5]. The M and E proteins are important for viral particle assembly and N is important for viral RNA packaging. The S protein, which provides the virion with a corona-like appearance, binds to host receptors and mediates membrane fusion. The successful development of effective treatments and vaccines against SARS-CoV depends on understanding the roles of various immune effectors in protective immunity and on identifying protective viral antigens recognized by these effector cells. In a preliminary study, the S protein fragment S358–374 was shown to stimulate the production of IFN-γ by CD8-T cells from immunized BALB/c mice.
The capacity of a diverse array of peptides to bind to an individual class I molecule is due to anchor residues in the peptides. The surface features of the binding cleft of the class I MHC molecule are complementary to side chains of the anchor residues in the displayed peptide. The amino acid residues lining the binding sites may vary among different class I allelic variants[9, 10]. Here, an SARS CoV S protein CTL epitope, S366–374, was identified and the functions of individual residues were evaluated by bioinformatics tool prediction and by IFN-γ responses induced by a series of modified S366–374 peptides.
Female BALB/c mice, 6–8 weeks old, were purchased from Zhongshan University Animal Center (Guangzhou, China) and maintained in our animal care facility under pathogen free conditions. For experimental purposes, six to eight week-old female mice were used. All experiments were performed according to the guidelines in the Institutional Animal Committee of Zhongshan School of Medicine, China.
SARS-CoV S DNA vaccine
Plasmids encoding SARS-CoV spike (S) protein was constructed as described, and kindly provided by Dr. Gary J. Nabel from Vaccine Research Center, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, MD, USA. Plasmid DNA was purified by plasmid-purified kit (QIAGEN, USA). The 260/280 ratios ranged from 1.8 to 2.0. The endotoxin content from purified plasmid DNA was found below 20 U/ml. The endotoxin level within this range had no effect on the immune response.
Synthesis, purification and analysis of S358-374 analogs
The peptides were synthesized by solid phase using an Fmoc strategy. 2-Chlorotrityl chloride resin loaded at 1.0 mmol/g (GL BIO Company, Shanghai, China) which was used in peptide synthesis and was chosen as the solid support. N-protected Fmoc amino acids were used. For functionalized amino acids, the following derivatives were used: Fmoc-Cys(trt)-OH, Fmoc-Leu-OH, Fmoc-Val-OH, Fmoc-Gly-OH, Fmoc-Ala-OH, Fmoc-Ser(tBu)-OH, Fmoc-Thr(tBu)-OH, Fmoc-Tyr(tBu)-OH, and Fmoc-Lys(Boc)-OH and were from GL BIO Company (Shanghai, China). The coupling reagent was 2-(1 H-benzotriazol-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate for all peptides. Syntheses of the different peptides were performed from 0.07 g of 2-Chlorotrityl chloride resin. An excess of 8 eq of each amino acid was used.
Fmoc deprotection was performed with a solution of piperidine in dimethylformamide in a 2/8 (v/v) ratio. Final deprotection of the peptides from the resin was performed in a mixture containing trifluoroacetic acid, phenol, water, triisprpylsilane in a 88/5/5/2 (v/v) ratio for 3.5 h. Peptides were then precipitated by addition of cold diethyl ether and dissolved in a mixture of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water/acetonitrile and lyophilized. Purity of all peptides was checked by analytical high performance liquid chromatography on a Waters instrument using a C18 column (Novarpack, 5 μm, 300 Å, 10.0 × 200 mm) and all were at least 70% pure (UV detection at 214 and 254 nm). They were characterized by electrospray mass spectrometry.
Immunization of mice
Female BALB/c mice were injected (i.m.) with 50 μg/mouse of SARS-CoV S plasmid DNA in 100 ul of sterile PBS. Mice were boosted twice at 2–3 weeks interval.
Cell culture and IFN-γ ELISA
Mice were sacrificed. Spleen from individual mouse was harvested one to two weeks after the final boost vaccination. Single cell suspensions were prepared and plated in a 96-well micro-titer plate at 4 × 105 cells/200 μl per well. Pooled SARS CoV S peptides (1 μg/ml for each) or single peptide (1 μg/ml) with anti-mouse CD28 mAb (1 μg/ml) were added to cultures. Supernatants of cell cultures were collected 72 h later, and levels of IFN-γ were assessed by specific ELISA kit (BD PharMingen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The detection limit of the IFN-γ assay kit was 3.13 pg/ml.
Assessment of SARS-CoV S-specific IFN-γ producing cells after vaccination was determined by ELISPOT (Diaclone, France) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, single cell suspensions were prepared from spleens of mice after vaccination, and plated in 96-well microplate precoated with anti-IFN-γ antibody specific for ELISPOT. Cells were incubated overnight in the presence or absence of peptide (1 μg/ml) and anti-CD28 (1 μg/ml). The plates were then washed and alkaline phosphatase conjugated anti-mouse IFN-γ antibody was added, developed with ready-to-use BCIP/NBT, and read by Champ Spot II ELISPOT reader (Sage Creation, China).
Cell surface and intracellular cytokine staining
Single-cell suspensions from spleens of mice after vaccination were stimulated with or without SARS CoV S peptides plus anti-CD28 (1 μg/ml) for 5 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. Brefeldin A (10 μg/ml, Sigma) was added in the last 4 h incubation. Cells were washed, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized in PBS buffer containing 0.1% saponin (Sigma), 0.1% BSA and 0.05% NaN3 overnight at 4°C. Cells were then stained with conjugated mAbs specific for CD4, CD8 and intracellular cytokine IFN-γ for 20–3 0 min at 4°C in dark. Cells (300,000) were acquired on flow cytometer (BD Calibur) and data were analyzed with FlowJo program, version 6.0 (Tree Star, Inc., USA). Isotype matched controls for cytokines were included in each staining.
T cell epitope prediction tools, ANN, SMM and ARB provided by IEDB are publicly available in a website (http://tools.immuneepitope.org/analyze/html/mhc_binding.html) Version 2009-09-01B.
Artificial Neural Network (ANN) is a connectionist models that consist of a number of interconnected units that can be activated by transmitting signals[13, 14]. ANN can tolerate a degree of erroneous data, and can classify nonlinear data, which makes them highly suitable for processing noisy biological information. ANN applications have been described for predictions of MHC class I binding peptides and for MHC class II peptides. The prediction accuracy of ANN-based methods was reported to be close to 80% sensitivity and 80% specificity.
Stabilized Matrix Method (SMM) is a T cell epitope predictive tool based on quantitative matrices. It has been successfully applied to predicting peptide binding to MHC molecules, peptide transport by the transporter associated with antigen presentation (TAP) and proteasomal cleavage of protein sequences[16, 17]. The sensitivity of SMM-based methods was reported to be close to 60%.
Average Relative Binding (ARB) is a matrix method, which allows combination of searches involving different peptide sizes and alleles into a single global prediction. ARB has achieved a favorable performance in predicting MHC I and MHC II molecules[20, 21].
Application of these tools was according to prompt dialog box showed in the website. In brief: a) Choose MHC class I model. b) Enter sequence of various peptides. c) Choose prediction method as ANN, SMM and ARB, respectively. d) Specify what to make binding predictions for. Select MHC source species as mouse, allele as H-2Kd, length as 9. e) Specify output. These tools predict IC50 values for peptide binding to specific MHC molecules. IC50 value means binding ability. Note that binding to MHC is necessary but not sufficient for recognition by T cells.
HLA Peptide Binding Predictions tool provided by BioInformatics and Molecular Analysis Section (BIMAS) (http://www-bimas.cit.nih.gov/cgi-bin/molbio/ken_parker_comboform) was used to compare the binding kinetics of peptides. The analysis is based on coefficient tables deduced from the published literature by Dr. Kenneth Parker. Application of this tool was according to prompt dialog box provided by the website. Higher half lime value means better binding ability.
Statistical evaluation of differences between means of experimental groups was performed by analysis of variance and a non-parametric two-tailed t test. P value <0.05 was considered to be significant.
N50 is a MHC-I restricted peptide in SARS-CoV S protein
Amino acid residue L374 is essential for stimulation of IFN-γ production in response to S365-374
S366-374 is the optimal epitope
Predicted MHC-peptide binding
Estimated half time of disassociation of peptides
Predicted binding affinity of the S366-374 series with one mutated residue
Predicted MHC-I binding affinities of A-, K-, and D-substituted S366–374 peptides
The production of IFN-γ induced by one residue-mutated S366-374
To confirm the key residues in S366–374, 27 analogs were synthesized in which each of the nine residues was replaced by A, K, or D. These peptides were used to stimulate splenocytes from SARS CoV S DNA immunized mice. ELISPOT (Figure3A) and ELISA (Figure3B) were performed to detect IFN-γ production.
The frequency of IFN-γ producing cells induced by K365A or K365D was similar to that induced by wild type S365–374 (KCYGVSATKL), and there was no obvious difference in the IFN-γ levels in the culture cell supernatants following peptide treatment. When C366 was replaced by A, the frequency of IFN-γ producing cells and the IFN-γ levels in the supernatant were also similar to wild type S365–374. When C366 was replaced by K or D, the frequency of IFN-γ producing cells was decreased by nearly 50%, and the level of IFN-γ in the supernatant was much lower than that induced by wild type S365–374. The S370 residue appeared to be more important than C366 for induction of IFN-γ as IFN-γ responses induced by S370A were similar to that induced by wild type S365–374, while treatment with S370K and S370D peptides resulted in a 75% lower frequency of IFN-γ producing cells and a significantly reduced supernatant IFN-γ concentration compared to wild type S365–374.
The L374 was also an essential residue in the epitope. No IFN-γ response was detected in mutated peptides without L374 (Figure2). However, when L374 was replaced by A, IFN-γ responses could still be detected. The frequency of IFN-γ producing cells following L374A treatment was about half that induced by wild type S365–374. When L374 was replaced by K, some IFN-γ spot forming units (SFUs) could also be detected. In addition, Y367 was important for IFN-γ induction; although about 200 SPU per 106 cells could be induced by Y367A or Y367K, the level of IFN-γ in the supernatant was significantly reduced compared to that induced by wild type S365–374. The K373 residue had a role similar to Y367. When K373 was replaced by A or D, the IFN-γ responses were similar to those induced by Y367 mutated peptides.
The most important residues in the epitope were G368, V369, A371, and T372. Almost no IFN-γ response could be detected when these residues were replaced by A, K, or D.
C366A and S370A are H-2 Kd restricted epitopes
The T cell epitopes of the SARS CoV spike protein are well known, but systematic evaluation of the functional and structural roles of each residue has not been reported for these antigenic epitopes[24–26]. In the preliminary study, by using a synthesized peptide pool of SARS CoV S protein to stimulate the splenocytes from SARS CoV S DNA vaccine immunized mice, we identified that the peptides of P50 and P51 could induce IFN-γ responses. P50 and P51 contained a same animo sequence, N50 (S365-374, KCYGVSATKL). In present study, N50 was synthesized and used to stimulate the splenocytes from immunized mice, ELISA, ELISPOT and FACS results all indicated that N50 contained a main CD8+ T cell epitope (Figure1). Moreover, S366–374 (CYGVSATKL) was shown to be an optimal H-2 Kd restricted epitope of the SARS CoV S protein by both bioinformatics prediction (Tables1 and2) and a functional INF-γ release assay (Figure2, Figure3).
To induce effective T cell responses, the T cell epitope must bind to an MHC molecule. All peptides that bind to class I molecules contain a carboxyl-terminal anchor[27, 28]. The anchor residues at both ends of the peptide are buried within the binding cleft, holding the peptide firmly in place. A previous study demonstrated that nonameric peptides bound preferentially and that the main contacts between class I MHC molecules were residue 2 at the amino-terminal end and residue 9 at the carboxyl terminus of the nonameric peptide. These anchors were generally hydrophobic residues (e.g., leucine and isoleucine).
Site-directed mutagenesis is a powerful tool for probing protein or peptide structure and function. Alanine-scanning, lysine-scanning, or aspartic acid-scanning by systematic replacement of side-chains with alanine, lysine, or aspartic acid have been used widely to study binding sites on proteins[22, 30]. Analysis of the functional importance of side-chains by mutational study may exaggerate the effect by imposing a structural disturbance or an unusual steric, electrostatic, or hydrophobic interaction. Alanine-scanning is the least disruptive to the peptide structure because alanine is uncharged and has the smallest amino acid side group next to glycine, and thus has been particularly useful for mapping protein functional domains. In contrast, glycine can change the main chain conformation of the protein, so individual alanine mutations are preferred to infer the roles of individual amino acid residues. Charged residues such as lysine and aspartic acid are capable of forming ion pairs and hydrogen bonds, so they often play an important role in protein binding as well as in the recognition of interacting proteins. Thus, lysine and aspartic acid are often used as substitutes to study electrostatic effects between proteins.
Computational prediction and modeling of MHC/peptide binding can greatly facilitate peptide screening, with tremendous savings in time and experimental effort. Using these methods, T cell epitopes in many vaccine candidates were identified[33, 34]. A number of prediction servers are available for identification of peptides that bind MHC molecules. Lin et al. have reported a comparative evaluation of thirty prediction servers for seven human MHC-I molecules. It showed that the best prediction server across all HLA molecules in this study is NETM_ANN, closely followed by IEDB ANN and IEDB SMM[35, 36].
In this study, both peptide-binding prediction methods and functional experiments were used to evaluate the roles of the different residues within the optimal epitope S365–374. Though K365 was excluded from this optimal epitope (Tables1 and2), the wild type S365–374 containing K365 induced a strong IFN-γ response (Figure2). Thus, K365 was included in these synthesized mutant peptides. A comparison of IFN-γ responses showed that mutants K365A or K365D were as potent as wild type S365–374 (Figure3), demonstrating that K365 is not in this optimal epitope and that residue in this position do not influence the function of S366–374.
The L374 at position P9 was predicted to be the carboxyl-terminal anchor in the epitope by ANN (Table3) and the functional experiment confirmed that analogs without L374 could not induce IFN-γ secretion from immunized mouse splenocytes (Figure2). However, L374A could still induce significant IFN-γ secretion, while L374K and L374D could not, suggesting that electrostatic effects and hydrophobic interaction may play an important role at this position.
Residue 2 at the amino-terminal end is another important anchor in many epitopes. In S366–374, Y367 at position P2 was predicted to be another important anchor by ANN (Table3). The functional assay showed that Y367 mutated peptides (Y367A and Y367K) could induce IFN-γ responses, but that IFN-γ production was lower than that induced by S366–374. That might indicate an important role for the Y side chain in determining the binding affinity to H-2 Kd.
The S370 at P5 is also a functionally significant residue in this epitope. Though not a traditional anchor, bioinformatics tools indicated that it might act as a weak anchor for H-2 Kd binding. The functional assay indicated that IFN-γ responses induced by S370 mutant epitopes were stronger than L374 mutant epitopes.
X-ray crystal lographic analyses of peptide-class I MHC complexes has revealed how the peptide-binding cleft in a given MHC molecule interacts stably with peptides. Vesselin Mitaksov described the crystal structure of the MHC class I protein H2-Kd in complex with the antigenic peptide TYQRTRALV (Flu) derived from an influenza nucleoprotein. They found that Flu residues Tyr P2, ThrP5, and ValP9 were sequestered into the B, C, and F pockets of the Kd groove, respectively. In the sequence of S366–374, the positions Tyr367, Ser370 and Leu374 were at P2, P5, and P9 as well, implying that Tyr367, Ser370 and Leu374 are anchors in this optimal CTL epitope.
All three bioinformatics tools indicated that C366 was included in this optimal epitope (Table1). In its absences, however, S367–374 could still induce an IFN-γ response, albeit weaker than that induced by wild type S365–374 (Figure2). Thus, C366 could influence the function of this epitope. The ANN tool predicated that C366 was not an anchor to H-2Kd and C366 mutant peptides could still induce strong IFN-γ responses, especially C366A, so our results indicate that C366 is not an important residue for the peptide-TCR interaction. Conversely, mutations of G368, V369, A371, T372, and K373 induced only modest IFN-γ production, demonstrating that these residues made greater contributions in presenting to TCR in this optimal CTL epitope. As predicated by ANN, T372 contributed to H-2 Kd binding (Table3). Indeed, IFN-γ responses induced by T372 mutant peptides were significantly weaker than peptides containing T372, indicating that T372 might contribute to the TCR interaction.
In the present study, we demonstrate that S366–374 is an optimal H-2 Kd CTL epitope in the SARS CoV S protein. Moreover, Y367, S370, and L374 are anchors in the epitope, while C366, G368, V369, A371, T372, and K373 may directly interact with TCR on the surface of CD8-T cells.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome
Spot forming unit
Fluorescence activated cell sorter
Artificial neural network
Stabilized matrix method
Average relative binding.
We are grateful to Drs. Gary J. Nabel, Zhiyong Yang, Richard A. Koup, and Robert T. Bailer, VRC, NIAID, NIH, USA for kindly providing us with SARS CoV S DNA plasmid and SARS CoV S peptides. This work was supported by grants from the Guangdong Recruitment Program of Creative Research Groups, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30340012), the Education Bureau of Guangdong Province, and Scientific and Technological Foundation of Guangzhou (2003Z3-E0491).
- Drosten C, Gunther S, Preiser W, van der Werf S, Brodt HR, Becker S, Rabenau H, Panning M, Kolesnikova L, Fouchier RA: Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003, 348: 1967-1976. 10.1056/NEJMoa030747.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peiris JS, Lai ST, Poon LL, Guan Y, Yam LY, Lim W, Nicholls J, Yee WK, Yan WW, Cheung MT: Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet. 2003, 361: 1319-1325. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13077-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tse GM, To KF, Chan PK, Lo AW, Ng KC, Wu A, Lee N, Wong HC, Mak SM, Chan KF: Pulmonary pathological features in coronavirus associated severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). J Clin Pathol. 2004, 57: 260-265. 10.1136/jcp.2003.013276.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rota PA, Oberste MS, Monroe SS, Nix WA, Campagnoli R, Icenogle JP, Penaranda S, Bankamp B, Maher K, Chen MH: Characterization of a novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Sci. 2003, 300: 1394-1399. 10.1126/science.1085952.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marra MA, Jones SJ, Astell CR, Holt RA, Brooks-Wilson A, Butterfield YS, Khattra J, Asano JK, Barber SA, Chan SY: The genome sequence of the SARS-associated coronavirus. Sci. 2003, 300: 1399-1404. 10.1126/science.1085953.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- He Y, Zhou Y, Siddiqui P, Jiang S: Inactivated SARS-CoV vaccine elicits high titers of spike protein-specific antibodies that block receptor binding and virus entry. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004, 325: 445-452. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.10.052.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang J, Cao Y, Du J, Bu X, Ma R, Wu C: Priming with SARS CoV S DNA and boosting with SARS CoV S epitopes specific for CD4+ and CD8+ T cells promote cellular immune responses. Vaccin. 2007, 25: 6981-6991. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.06.047.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Laugel B, van der Berg HA, Gostick E, Cole DK, Wooldridge L, Boulter J, Milicic A, Price DA, Sewell AK: Different T cell receptor affinity thresholds and CD8 coreceptor dependence govern cytotoxic T lymphocyte activation and tetramer binding properties. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282: 23799-23810. 10.1074/jbc.M700976200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anderson MW, Gorski J: Cutting edge: TCR contacts as anchors: effects on affinity and HLA-DM stability. J Immunol. 2003, 171: 5683-5687.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee Y, Ferrari G, Lee SC: Estimating design space available for polyepitopes through consideration of major histocompatibility complex binding motifs. Biomed Microdevices. 2010, 12: 207-222. 10.1007/s10544-009-9376-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang ZY, Kong WP, Huang Y, Roberts A, Murphy BR, Subbarao K, Nabel GJ: A DNA vaccine induces SARS coronavirus neutralization and protective immunity in mice. Nature. 2004, 428: 561-564. 10.1038/nature02463.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thompson RE, Jolliffe KA, Payne RJ: Total synthesis of microcin B17 via a fragment condensation approach. Org Lett. 2011, 13: 680-683. 10.1021/ol102916b.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meister GE, Roberts CG, Berzofsky JA, De Groot AS: Two novel T cell epitope prediction algorithms based on MHC-binding motifs; comparison of predicted and published epitopes from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and HIV protein sequences. Vaccin. 1995, 13: 581-591. 10.1016/0264-410X(94)00014-E.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Buus S, Lauemoller SL, Worning P, Kesmir C, Frimurer T, Corbet S, Fomsgaard A, Hilden J, Holm A, Brunak S: Sensitive quantitative predictions of peptide-MHC binding by a 'query by committee' artificial neural network approach. Tissue Antigens. 2003, 62: 378-384. 10.1034/j.1399-0039.2003.00112.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brusic V, Bajic VB, Petrovsky N: Computational methods for prediction of T-cell epitopes–a framework for modelling, testing, and applications. Methods. 2004, 34: 436-443. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2004.06.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peters B, Sette A: Generating quantitative models describing the sequence specificity of biological processes with the stabilized matrix method. BMC Bioinform. 2005, 6: 132-10.1186/1471-2105-6-132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peters B, Tong W, Sidney J, Sette A, Weng Z: Examining the independent binding assumption for binding of peptide epitopes to MHC-I molecules. Bioinform. 2003, 19: 1765-1772. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg247.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Doytchinova IA, Guan P, Flower DR: EpiJen: a server for multistep T cell epitope prediction. BMC Bioinform. 2006, 7: 131-10.1186/1471-2105-7-131.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bui HH, Sidney J, Peters B, Sathiamurthy M, Sinichi A, Purton KA, Mothe BR, Chisari FV, Watkins DI, Sette A: Automated generation and evaluation of specific MHC binding predictive tools: ARB matrix applications. Immunogenet. 2005, 57: 304-314. 10.1007/s00251-005-0798-y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peters B, Bui HH, Frankild S, Nielson M, Lundegaard C, Kostem E, Basch D, Lamberth K, Harndahl M, Fleri W: A community resource benchmarking predictions of peptide binding to MHC-I molecules. PLoS Comput Biol. 2006, 2: e65-10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020065.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang P, Sidney J, Kim Y, Sette A, Lund O, Nielsen M, Peters B: Peptide binding predictions for HLA DR DP and DQ molecules. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11: 568-10.1186/1471-2105-11-568.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Parker KC, Bednarek MA, Coligan JE: Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains. J Immunol. 1994, 152: 163-175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen M, Lund O: NN-align. An artificial neural network-based alignment algorithm for MHC class II peptide binding prediction. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10: 296-10.1186/1471-2105-10-296.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang B, Chen H, Jiang X, Zhang M, Wan T, Li N, Zhou X, Wu Y, Yang F, Yu Y: Identification of an HLA-A*0201-restricted CD8+ T-cell epitope SSp-1 of SARS-CoV spike protein. Blood. 2004, 104: 200-206. 10.1182/blood-2003-11-4072.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang J, James E, Roti M, Huston L, Gebe JA, Kwok WW: Searching immunodominant epitopes prior to epidemic: HLA class II-restricted SARS-CoV spike protein epitopes in unexposed individuals. Int Immunol. 2009, 21: 63-71.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhi Y, Kobinger GP, Jordan H, Suchma K, Weiss SR, Shen H, Schumer G, Gao G, Boyer JL, Crystal RG: Identification of murine CD8 T cell epitopes in codon-optimized SARS-associated coronavirus spike protein. Virol. 2005, 335: 34-45. 10.1016/j.virol.2005.01.050.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boesteanu A, Brehm M, Mylin LM, Christianson GJ, Tevethia SS, Roopenian DC, Joyce S: A molecular basis for how a single TCR interfaces multiple ligands. J Immunol. 1998, 161: 4719-4727.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robinson RA, Lee DR: Studies of tum- peptide analogs define an alternative anchor that can be utilized by Ld ligands lacking the consensus P2 anchor. J Immunol. 1996, 156: 4266-4273.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Malik A, Houghten R, Corradin G, Buus S, Berzofsky JA, Hoffman SL: Identification of a nonameric H-2Kk-restricted CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitope on the Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein. Infect Immun. 1995, 63: 1955-1959.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mitaksov V, Fremont DH: Structural definition of the H-2Kd peptide-binding motif. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 10618-10625. 10.1074/jbc.M510511200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wells JA: Additivity of mutational effects in proteins. Biochem. 1990, 29: 8509-8517. 10.1021/bi00489a001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arabshahi A, Frey PA: Standard free energy for the hydrolysis of adenylylated T4 DNA ligase and the apparent pKa of lysine 159. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 8586-8588. 10.1074/jbc.274.13.8586.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Srinivasan KN, Zhang GL, Khan AM, August JT, Brusic V: Prediction of class I T-cell epitopes: evidence of presence of immunological hot spots inside antigens. Bioinform. 2004, 20 (Suppl 1): i297-i302. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth943.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Soam SS, Khan F, Bhasker B, Mishra BN: Prediction of MHC class I binding peptides using probability distribution functions. Bioinformation. 2009, 3: 403-408. 10.6026/97320630003403.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin HH, Ray S, Tongchusak S, Reinherz EL, Brusic V: Evaluation of MHC class I peptide binding prediction servers: applications for vaccine research. BMC Immunol. 2008, 9: 8-10.1186/1471-2172-9-8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang GL, Srinivasan KN, Veeramani A, August JT, Brusic V: PREDBALB/c: a system for the prediction of peptide binding to H2d molecules, a haplotype of the BALB/c mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: W180-W183. 10.1093/nar/gki479.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bolin DR, Swain AL, Sarabu R, Berthel SJ, Gillespie P, Huby NJ, Makofske R, Orzechowski L, Perrotta A, Toth K: Peptide and peptide mimetic inhibitors of antigen presentation by HLA-DR class II MHC molecules. Design, structure-activity relationships, and X-ray crystal structures. J Med Chem. 2000, 43: 2135-2148. 10.1021/jm000034h.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.