- Research article
- Open Access
Immune responses of Helicoverpa armigera to different kinds of pathogens
© Wang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 28 August 2009
- Accepted: 3 March 2010
- Published: 3 March 2010
Insects react against pathogens through innate immunity. The cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera (H. armigera) is an important defoliator and an extremely destructive pest insect of many crops. The elucidation of the mechanism of the immune response of H. armigera to various pathogens can provide a theoretical basis for new approaches to biologically control this pest.
Four kinds of pathogens Bacillus thuringiensis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Candida albicans, and Autographa californica multiple nucleocapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus harbored green fluorescence protein and polyhedron (Ac MNPV-GFP) were used to challenge the insect. The cellular and humoral immune responses to the pathogens were analyzed in the challenged H. armigera. The results show that in the five kinds of haemocytes, only granulocytes phagocytized the Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and fungi. All haemocytes can be infected by Ac MNPV. Fourteen immune-related genes including pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) such as peptidoglycan recognition proteins (HaPGRP and HaPGRP C) and Gram-Negative Bacteria-Binding Protein (HaGNBP), and antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) such as cecropin-1, 2 and 3 (HaCec-1, 2 and 3), lysozyme (HaLys), attacin (HaAtt), gallerimycin-like (HaGall), gloverin-like (HaGlo), moricin-like (HaMor), cobatoxin-like (HaCob), galiomicin-like (HaGali), and immune inducible protein (HaIip) appeared in different expression profiles to different pathogen infections. The transcripts of 13 immune related genes (except HaPGRPC) are obviously up-regulated by Gram-positive bacteria. HaCec-1 and 3, HaMor, HaAtt, HaLys, HaIip, HaPGRP and HaGNBP are greatly up-regulated after fungal infection. HaGNBP, HaCec-2, HaGall, HaGlo, HaMor, HaCob, HaGali obviously increased in Gram-negative bacterial infection. Only five genes, HaGNBP, HaCec-1, HaGali, HaGlo, and HaLys, are weakly up-regulated after viral infection. The AMP transcripts had higher expression levels than the PRR transcripts after the microbial challenge.
These data suggest that the granulocytes are the major phagocytes in H. armigera. All haemocytes can be infected by Ac MNPV. The transcripts of 14 immune related genes have different expression patterns in H. armigera infected by different pathogens, which means that the immune-related genes may have different functions against various kinds of pathogens.
- Down Syndrome
- Antimicrobial Peptide
- Acridine Orange
- Immune Related Gene
The immune system is generally divided into innate and adaptive immunity. Innate immunity is characterized by quick reactions that cause immediate immune responses. In contrast, adaptive immunity is a slow reaction with high specificity and memory. Adaptive immunity has remarkable specificity based on somatic gene rearrangement and hypermutation, leading to an extremely large repertoire of T- and B-cell receptors and antibodies. Such adaptive immunity is restricted to jawed vertebrates. Invertebrates only rely on their innate immune defenses.
The innate immune system of insects relies on both humoral and cellular responses . Haemocytes are the primary mediators of cell-mediated immunity in insects including phagocytosis, nodulation, encapsulation, and melanization. The humoral response of innate immunity includes three steps: 1) identification of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) on pathogens by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) ; 2) activation of the regulatory pathways; and 3) production of immune effectors including cellular phagocytosis and molecular effectors such as antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) .
Innate immune recognition is an active area of research that has quickly developed over the last few years along with the study of Toll receptors [4–6]. Unlike adaptive immunity, which recognizes every antigen, innate immunity recognizes the conserved Pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) of the pathogens by the PRRs of the hosts . Several PRRs have been reported such as peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs), thioester-containing proteins (TEPs), Gram-negative binding proteins (GNBPs), multidomain scavenger receptors (SCRs), C-type lectins (CTL), galectins (GALE) , and Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule (DSCAM) .
Effector molecules such as AMPs are found in most of plants and animals, and their functions in innate immunity are well investigated [9, 10]. Approximately 1,000 varieties of AMPs have been reported from vertebrates, invertebrates, human beings, and plants since the Boman group reported the first cecropin from Hyalophora cecropia. In most insects, AMPs are synthesized in the fat body and haemocytes and are then released to the haemolymph.
Insect innate immunity has been studied in D. melanogaster, Anopheles gambia, and Maduca sexta[12, 13], but fewer studies have been conducted on the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. H. armigera is a worldwide pest that has developed strong resistance to chemical and biological pesticides. New approaches to control this pest can be designed if the mechanism of its immune responses to pathogens is understood. We have reported the function of a pattern recognition receptor (C-type lectin) in the insect [14, 15]. To further investigate the mechanism of H. armigera's response to pathogen infections, its cellular responses to four kinds of pathogens, namely, Gram-positive bacterial, Gram-negative bacterial, fungal, and viral pathogens which are Bacillus thuringiensis (G+-bacterium), Klebsiella pneumoniae (G--bacterium), Candida albicans (fungus), and Autographa californica multiple nucleocapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus harbored green fluorescence protein and polyhedron (Ac MNPV-GFP) (virus), respectively, were investigated. Simultaneously, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis was performed at different times after the challenge by these pathogens. Fourteen immunity-related genes including PRRs and antimicrobial peptide genes were chosen for the analysis. The results demonstrated that the innate immune responses of H. armigera larvae to the pathogens included cellular phagocytosis and up-regulated expression of immune effector genes.
Cellular responses to pathogens in vivo
Immune related genes obtained by random sequencing
Molecular responses of H. armigera to the pathogens
To analyze the molecular responses of H. armigera to 4 different pathogens, quantitative real-time PCR was performed. The time course expression patterns of 14 genes were examined including three upstream PRR genes such as HaPGRP and HaPGRP C, and HaGNBP, and 11 downstream effector genes such as HaCec-1,2 and 3, HaLys, HaAtt, HaGall, HaGlo, HaMor, HaCob, HaGali and HaIip.
The HaGali, HaGlo, and HaLys were up-regulated by four microbial challenges. However, they exhibited different expression patterns. The expression of HaGali was up-regulated by four microbial challenge 3 h post-injection, with the highest expression after fungal challenge at 12 h (Fig. 5D). The mRNA of HaGlo was also up-regulated by four microbes 3 h post-injection but with the highest expression after viral challenge at 3 h (Fig. 5E). The expression of HaLys was up-regulated by four pathogens with different patterns. It was up-regulated 3 h post-injection of the G+ bacteria and gradually recovered to normal level from 6 h to 24 h, and it was up-regulated 3 h post-injection of the fungus and gradually increased to a higher level from 12 h to 24 h post-injection. Similar to fungus induction, HaLys was up-regulated by Ac MNPV 6 h post-injection and reached the highest level at 12 h post-injection. HaLys showed higher responses to virus and fungus than to bacteria (Fig. 5F). The evidence suggested that the genes had different responses to different pathogens. HaGali responded well to fungus;HaGlo responded well to virus; and HaLys responded well to both fungus and virus.
The HaGall and HaIip only responded to two pathogens. HaGall was greatly up-regulated by G- bacteria 6 h after injection and was weakly up-regulated by fungus at 12 h post-injection (Fig. 6D). HaIip was greatly up-regulated by fungus 6 h after injection and was weakly up-regulated by G+ bacteria at 3 h to 12 h post-injection (Fig. 6E). These two genes could play roles against G- bacteria infection and fungus infection, respectively.
This work first investigated the immune responses at the cellular and humoral levels of H. armigera to four pathogens, B. thuringiensis, K. pneumoniae, C. albicans, and Ac MNPV-GFP, which represent G+ bacterial, G- bacterial, fungal, and viral pathogens, respectively. The results revealed that the innate immunity of H. armigera larvae responded both on cellular and humoral levels against these pathogens.
Regarding the functions of haemocytes relating to innate immunity, it is known that plasmatocytes form the bulk of capsules around foreign bodies. Granular haemocytes phagocytize foreign pathogens, and oenocytoids produce phenoloxidases (PO), which are responsible for haemolymph melanization . Plasmatocytes are involved in the phagocytosis of non-self microsphere beads, whereas granulocytes are involved in the phagocytosis of self-dead cells. Other studies showed that phagocytes of Manduca sexta had similar functions as vertebrate phagocytes . This study demonstrated that granulocytes were the major cells that phagocytized G+ and G- bacteria, and fungi. No phagocytosis function was observed for other kinds of haemocytes in H. armigera. This suggested that haemocytes played different roles in different insect species.
In addition to cellular immunity, humoral immunity also plays significant role in insect immunity, which involves the induction of a robust AMPs that kill invading pathogens . Eleven AMP genes were found from H. armigera in this study: HaCec-1, 2 and 3, HaGall, HaGlo, HaLys, HaMor, HaCob, HaAtt, HaGali, and HaIip. They belong to 9 kinds of AMPs.
Some functions of these AMPs are known in other species. For example, the cecropins are linear, cationic AMPs that cause lysis of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria . HaCec-1 appeared to have very high expression levels in fungus C. albicans-injected larvae and Ac MNPV-injected larvae in addition to G+ and G- bacteria, suggesting that HaCec-1 not only responded to G+ and G- bacteria but also to fungus and virus, and might play very important roles in H. armigera immunity.
Furthermore, Galiomicin, a defensin first found in Galleria mellonella, has antibacterial and antifungal activities . The results of this study were consistent to the report except for the detection of some up-regulation of HaGali after virus infection. Gloverins, a family of glycine-rich polypeptides, are effective against G- bacteria and are inactive against G+ bacteria, yeasts, mammalian cell lines, and pestivirus . However, up-regulation of this gene was detected after four kinds of pathogens were injected into H. armigera including G+ and G- bacteria, fungus, and virus. The highest expression of HaGlo after Ac MNPV virus injection suggests that this gene may play a role in antivirus defense. Lysozymes are a type of hydrolase which can digest the peptidoglycan layer of the bacteria cell wall by hydrolyzing the β-1,4-glycosidic linkage between N-acetylglucosamine and N-acetylmuramic acid. Lysozymes also hydrolyze the β-1, 4-linkages of chitooligosaccharides in the fungal cell wall. Therefore, lysozymes have antibacterial and antifungal activities . In addition to the antibacterial and antifungal activities, the results of this study indicate that HaLys also highly respond to virus, which implies its role in antivirus defense.
Moricin is a highly basic AMP first reported in the silkworm Bombyx mori. It shows antibacterial activity against several G- and G+ bacteria . The results in H. armigera showed that HaMor also had a higher expression after C. albicans (fungus) induction, suggesting that HaMor played a role in antifungus response. Cobatoxin is a toxin present in the venom of the Centruroides noxius scorpion that blocks two K+-channel subtypes: voltage-gated and Ca2+-activated channels . The results of this study show HaCob responded to G- and G+ bacteria and fungus infections in H. amigera. Attacin is an AMP, originally isolated from the immune haemolymph of Hyalophora cecropia. The antibacterial effect of attacin was found to be limited to some species of Gram-negative bacteria . In H. armigera, HaAtt responded to G+ bacteria and fungus better than G-bacteria, suggesting that HaAtt participated in the anti-G+ bacteria and fungus response in addition to G- bacteria.
Gallerimycin is an antifungal peptide from the greater wax moth G. mellonella. Its expression is up-regulated after stimulation with bacterial lipopolyscaccharides (G- bacteria). Gallerimycin is active against the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae but not against yeast and Gram-negative or Gram-positive bacteria in G. mellonella. Helicoverpa gallerimycin-like AMP had a very high expression after the G- bacteria (K. pneumoniae) challenge, suggesting that it played a role in G- bacteria defense. HaIip is an antimicrobial peptide with Knot1 domain representing plant lectins http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de. The up-regulation of HaIip in H. armigera after the induction of fungus (C. albicans) suggests that it played an important role in antifungal defending.
Innate immunity was formerly thought to be a non-specific immune response characterized by phagocytosis. However, innate immunity has considerable specificity and is capable of discriminating between self and non-self, as proposed in the concept of PRRs of the host. These PRRs can recognize conserved PAMPs shared by large groups of microorganisms, therefore successfully defending invertebrates and vertebrates against infection . PGRP was first purified from silkworm (Bombyx mori) hemolymph based on the high affinity of PGRP to bacterial peptidoglycans. GNBPs have been originally described in the silkworm B. mori, and one of them is known to bind strongly to the surface of Gram-negative bacteria. The expression of HaPGRP was up-regulated by G+ bacteria and fungi; the HaGNBP was up-regulated by four kinds of pathogens. These results indicated that the PRRs in H. armigera might have different functions in the pattern recognition.
The results of expression patterns revealed that most examined genes were significantly up-regulated after infection by pathogens. However, the responses of the genes to different kinds of pathogens showed specific characters. Although some genes could respond to all four tested pathogens, the intensity of their expression to different pathogens varied. For instance, HaCec-1, HaCec-3, and HaIip were greatly up-regulated after fungi infection, which suggests that these genes mostly responded to fungal infection in H. armigera, although they also did respond to other pathogens. HaCec-2 was up-regulated by G+ and G- bacteria, which suggests that it responds to bacteria. HaGall obviously increased in G- bacterium (K. pneumoniae) infection, and HaGlo also obviously increased in Ac MNPV infection, which might imply that these genes were involved in response to the Gram-negative bacterium or virus, respectively. In addition, only five genes were up-regulated after virus infection: HaGNBP, HaCe1, HaGali, HaGlo, and HaLys, but the expression levels of the genes against the virus were much lower except HaGlo and HaLys. These phenomena suggest that the same AMP gene might respond to different pathogens by different expression patterns.
Lemaitre et al.  found that the challenge of fruit flies with a fungus results in the biosynthesis of anti-fungal AMPs, whereas the challenge by a G- bacterium results in the up-regulation of AMPs appropriate for the destruction of such bacteria. It seems that there is no strict correspondence in the immune response of H. armigera against different pathogens in mRNA level, although there are specific characters as described above. The expression patterns and functions of the immune related genes at protein levels need to be investigated in the future work.
There is growing interest in antiviral mechanism in Drosophila[29–31]. Dostert et al. identified 140 genes that were upregulated in adult Drosophila 24 and 48 h post injection with Drosophila C virus. Two thirds of these genes were not upregulated in response to bacterial or fungal infections. However, most genes encoding antimicrobial peptides regulated by the Toll and Imd pathways were not upregulated or were only weakly upregulated by DCV infection . Same situation was found in H. armigera, only HaGlo and HaLys were weakly upregulated by viral challenge. This might suggest that the insect used a distinct mechanism to combat viral infection. H. armigera is a good model to analyze the viral infection. It is worth further investigation for the antiviral mechanism.
Five kinds of hemocytes were distinguished in H. armigera, the granulocytes in the insect are the major phagocytes. All haemocytes can be infected by Ac MNPV. The expression patterns of 3 upstream PRR genes and 11 downstream effector genes in the insect were analyzed by qRT-PCR. The transcripts of 14 immune related genes have different expression patterns in H. armigera infected by different pathogens. Most of the genes were upregulated by bacteria and fungi, and only five genes were upregulated by the virus Ac MNPV. These data suggested that the immune-related genes might have different functions against various kinds of pathogens.
The chemicals were obtained from the following separate companies: Unizol reagent (Biostar Company, Shanghai, China); Reverse Transcriptase (RT) Kit (Promega Biosciences, Madison WI, USA); PCR purification kit (Shengong, Shanghai, China); Ex Taq Polymerase and SYBR®Premix EX Taq (TaKaRa Biotech, Dalian, China); and 4'-6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI, 1 μg/ml in water, San Jose, United States). Grace's medium was from Invitrogen (United States).
The eggs of H. armigera were obtained from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Science, Wuhan, China. After incubation, the larvae were maintained in the laboratory at 26 ± 1°C under light and dark conditions for 14:10 h and were reared on the artificial diet described by Zhao et al. .
Bacillus thuringiensis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Candida albicans were from Shandong Agricultural University. Ac MNPV-GFP was constructed in the researchers' laboratory .
The G+ bacterium B. thuringiensis, G- bacterium K. pneumoniae, and fungus C. albicans were cultured overnight in 5 ml Luria-Bertani medium (LB, 1% trytone, 0.5% yeast extract, 1% NaCl in w/v, pH 7.0). The virus Ac MNPV-GFP was cultured in Sf21cells with Grace's medium.
Phagocytosis of the pathogens in vivo in H. armigera larvae
B. thuringiensis, K. pneumoniae, and C. albicans were collected from the LB medium by centrifugation at 6,000 rpm for 10 min, fixed in 95% ethanol for 10 min, suspended in PBS (140 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4, pH7.4), added to acridine orange at 1 μg/ml for 10 min, centrifuged, and washed in PBS to clear. The microbes stained with acridine orange were injected into the haemocoels of three 5th instar 24 h larvae. Each larva was injected with 1 × 105 colony forming units (cfu) in 5 μl of PBS. The haemocytes were collected by cutting the proleg of the caterpillar 3 h post-injection, mixed a 200 μl PBS with 1 mM reduced glutathione and covered by glass cover slip, and observed under microscope.
Infection of larvae by the pathogens and extraction of RNA
B. thuringiensis, K. pneumoniae, and C. albicans were collected from the LB medium by centrifugation at 6,000 rpm for 10 min, washed three times with PBS, and then resuspended in PBS. The number of pathogens was calculated by a haemocytometer. The pathogens were injected into the haemocoels of six 5th instar 24 h larvae. Each larva was injected with 1 × 105 colony forming units (cfu) in 5 μl of PBS. The budded virus (BV) of Ac MNPV-GFP, amplified in Sf21 cells, was injected into the haemocoels at a concentration of 1 × 107pfu/5 μl/larva. AcMNPV virus was quantitated using plaque forming units following the viral plaque assay in the instruction manual of Bac-to-Bac Baculovirus Expression Systems of Invitrogen http://wolfson.huji.ac.il/expression/bac.pdf. Briefly, the monolayers of Sf9 cells were prepared in 6-well plates, Eight-log serial diluted virus (10-1- 10-8) were produced and the diluted virus (10-3- 10-8) were added to each well of the plates respectively and incubate 1 h at room temperature. Sequentially the virus inoculum was removed from the wells and replaced with 2 ml diluted agarose and incubated at 27°C in a incubator for 5 days. The number of plaques was counted. The titer of the virus can be calculated by the following formula: pfu/ml of the virus = 1/dilution factor × number of plaques × 1/(ml of inoculum/plate). Controls were injected with PBS or Grace's medium, respectively, for the bacteria and virus. A fluorescence microscope (Olympus BX51) was used to observe the green fluorescence. The total RNAs were extracted from the whole bodies of three randomly chosen larvae per treatment to normalize the individual difference and then they were reverse transcribed to complementary deoxyribonucleic acid (cDNA) for quantitative real-time PCR analysis.
cDNA library construction
The total RNA was extracted from whole body of H. armigera using Unizol reagent following the manufacture's instructions (Biostar, Shanghai, China). Messenger RNA (mRNA) was extracted with the PolyATract mRNA isolation system (Promega, USA). The mRNAs were used to construct a cDNA library. The Creator SMART cDNA Library Construction Kit (Clontech, USA) was used for the cDNA library construction following the manufacturer's instructions. The double strand cDNA was digested and ligated with the pDNR-LIB vector, and then transformed into competent DH5α cells. Individual colonies were randomly selected, and plasmid was extracted for sequencing from the 5'-ends (Beijing Genomics Institute, China).
Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)
Primers for Quantitative Real-time PCR
Name of gene
Name of primer
cDNA length (bp)
immune inducible protein
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30710103901) and the National High Technology Research & Development Program of China (Program 863:2007AA09Z425).
- MD Lavine, Strand MR: Insect hemocytes and their role in immunity. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2002, 32: 1295-1309. 10.1016/S0965-1748(02)00092-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Medzhitov R, Janeway C: Innate immune recognition: mechanisms and pathways. Immunological Reviews. 2000, 173: 89-97. 10.1034/j.1600-065X.2000.917309.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schulenburg H, Kurz CL, Ewbank JJ: Evolution of the innate immune system: the worm perspective. Immunol Rev. 2004, 198: 36-58. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0125.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akira S: TLR signaling. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2006, 311: 1-16. full_text.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christophides GK, Vlachou D, Kafatos FC: Comparative and functional genomics of the innate immune system in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Immunol Rev. 2004, 198: 127-48. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0127.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rast JP, Smith LC, Loza-Coll M, Hibino T, Litman GW: Review - Genomic insights into the immune system of the sea urchin. Science. 2006, 314: 952-956. 10.1126/science.1134301.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Janeway CJ: The role of self-recognition in receptor repertoire development. Immunol Res. 1999, 19: 107-18. 10.1007/BF02786480.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Watson FL, Puttmann-Holgado R, Thomas F, Lamar DL, Hughes M, Kondo M, Rebel VI, Schmucker D: Extensive diversity of Ig-superfamily proteins in the immune system of insects. Science. 2005, 309: 1874-1878. 10.1126/science.1116887.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bulet P, Stocklin R, Menin L: Anti-microbial peptides: from invertebrates to vertebrates. Immunological Reviews. 2004, 198: 169-184. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0124.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zasloff M: Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature. 2002, 415: 389-95. 10.1038/415389a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hultmark D, Steiner H, Rasmuson T, Boman HG: Insect immunity Purification and properties of three inducible bactericidal proteins from hemolymph of immunized pupae of Hyalophora cecropia. Eur J Biochem. 1980, 106: 7-16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christophides GK, Zdobnov E, Barillas-Mury C, Birney E, Blandin S, Blass C, Brey PT, Collins FH, Danielli A, Dimopoulos G, et al.,: Immunity-related genes and gene families in Anopheles gambiae. Science. 2002, 298: 159-165. 10.1126/science.1077136.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoffmann JA, Kafatos FC, Janeway CA, Ezekowitz RAB: Phylogenetic perspectives in innate immunity. Science. 1999, 284: 1313-1318. 10.1126/science.284.5418.1313.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chai LQ, Tian YY, Yang DT, Wang JX, Zhao XF: Molecular cloning and characterization of a C-type lectin from the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. Dev Comp Immunol. 2008, 32: 71-83. 10.1016/j.dci.2007.04.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tian YY, Liu Y, Zhao XF, Wang JX: Characterization of a C-type lectin from the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. Dev Comp Immunol. 2009, 33: 772-9. 10.1016/j.dci.2009.01.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ribeiro C, Brehélin M: Insect haemocytes: what type of cell is that?. J Insect Physiol. 2006, 52: 417-29. 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2006.01.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ling E, Yu X: Prophenoloxidase binds to the surface of hemocytes and is involved in hemocyte melanization in Manduca sexta. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2005, 35-Google Scholar
- Steiner H, Hultmark D, Engstrom A, Bennich H, Boman HG: Sequence and specificity of two antibacterial proteins involved in insect immunity. Nature. 1981, 292: 246-8. 10.1038/292246a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee Y, Yun E, Jang W, Kim I, Lee J, Park S, Ryu K, Seo S, Kim C, LI H: Purification, cDNA cloning and expression of an insect defensin from the great wax moth, Galleria mellonella. Insect Mol Biol. 2004, 13: 65-72. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2004.00462.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mackintosh JA, Gooley AA, Karuso PH, Beattie AJ, Jardine DR, Veal DA: A gloverin-like antibacterial protein is synthesized in Helicoverpa armigera following bacterial challenge. Developmental and Comparative Immunology. 1998, 22: 387-399. 10.1016/S0145-305X(98)00025-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fiolka MJ, Ptaszynska AA, Czarniawski W: Antibacterial and antifungal lysozyme-type activity in Cameraria ohridella pupae. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2005, 90: 1-9. 10.1016/j.jip.2005.06.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hara S, Yamakawa M: Moricin, a novel type of antibacterial peptide isolated from the silkworm, Bombyx mori. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270: 29923-29927. 10.1074/jbc.270.50.29923.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Selisko B, Garcia C, Becerril B, Gomez-Lagunas F, Garay C, Possani LD: Cobatoxins 1 and 2 from Centruroides noxius Hoffmann constitute a subfamily of potassium-channel-blocking scorpion. European Journal of Biochemistry. 1998, 254: 468-479. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2540468.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carlsson A, Engström P, Palva E, H B: Attacin, an antibacterial protein from Hyalophora cecropia, inhibits synthesis of outer membrane proteins in Escherichia coli by interfering with omp gene transcription. Infect Immun. 1991, 59: 3040-3045.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schuhmann B, Seitz V, Vilcinskas A, Podsiadlowski L: Cloning and expression of gallerimycin, an antifungal peptide expressed in immune response of greater wax moth larvae, Galleria mellonella. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology. 2003, 53: 125-133. 10.1002/arch.10091.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoshida H, Kinoshita K, Ashida M: Purification of a peptidoglycan recognition protein from hemolymph of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 13854-60. 10.1074/jbc.271.23.13854.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee WJ, Lee JD, Kravchenko VV, Ulevitch RJ, Brey PT: Purification and molecular cloning of an inducible gram-negative bacteria-binding protein from the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93: 7888-93. 10.1073/pnas.93.15.7888.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lemaitre B, Reichart J-M, Hoffmann J: Drosophila host defense: differential induction of antimicrobial peptide genes after infection by various classes of microorganisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 14614-14619. 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14614.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li H, Li WX, Ding SW: Induction and suppression of RNA silencing by an animal virus. Science. 2002, 296: 1319-21. 10.1126/science.1070948.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hedges LM, Johnson KN: Induction of host defence responses by Drosophila C virus. J Gen Virol. 2008, 89: 1497-501. 10.1099/vir.0.83684-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dostert C, Jouanguy E, Irving P, Troxler L, Galiana-Arnoux D, Hetru C, Hoffmann JA, Imler JL: The Jak-STAT signaling pathway is required but not sufficient for the antiviral response of drosophila. Nat Immunol. 2005, 6: 946-53. 10.1038/ni1237.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhao X-F, Wang J-X, Wang Y-C: Purification and characterization of a cysteine proteinase from eggs of the cotton boll worm, Helicoverpa armigera. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1998, 28: 259-264. 10.1016/S0965-1748(98)00015-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shao H-L, Dong D-J, Hu J-D, Zhang X-C, Zhang Y-B, Fu Q, Sun C, Wang J-X, Zhao X-F: Reconstruction of AcMNPV with Helicoverpa hormone receptor 3 and its effect on the Helicoverpa larvae. Biocontrol Sci Techn. 2007, 17: 95-104. 10.1080/09583150600937022.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.