Skip to main content
Download PDF

NLRP3 (rs10754558) gene polymorphism and tumor necrosis factor alpha as predictors for disease activity and response to methotrexate and adalimumab in psoriasis

BMC Immunology volume 25, Article number: 40 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Psoriasis has a global prevalence of 1–3%, with variations observed across different ethnic groups and geographical areas. Disease susceptibility and response to anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) drugs suggest different genetic regulatory mechanisms which may include NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) polymorphism. Evaluation of the NLRP3 gene polymorphism, the serum level of CRP and TNFα in psoriasis patients and assessment of the NLRP3 (rs10754558) gene polymorphism, CRP and TNFα with disease severity and their role as biomarkers for response to Methotrexate and Adalimumab in psoriasis. The study had a total of 75 patients diagnosed with psoriasis vulgaris, who were compared to a control group of 75 healthy individuals.

Results

There was a highly significant difference in NLRP3 genotypes and alleles distribution between psoriasis patients and controls (P = 0.002,0.004). The heterozygote genotype GC (OR = 3.67,95%CI:1.75–7.68, P = 0.0006), was linked with increased risk of psoriasis. Additionally, The GC genotype was significantly associated with nonresponse to psoriasis therapy (OR = 11.7,95%CI:3.24–42.28, P = 0.0002). Regarding serum CRP and TNFα levels, there was a highly statistically significant difference between psoriasis patients and controls (P < 0.0001), and there was also a highly statistically significant difference between responders and non-responders in psoriasis patients regarding PASI 50 (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The NLRP3 (rs10754558) genotypes GC was associated with the severe form of psoriasis and with nonresponse to psoriasis medication. Therefore, NLRP3 (rs10754558) gene polymorphism is an important prognostic biomarker in psoriasis patients. The serum TNFα can be used as a predictor for response to therapy in psoriasis patients. More research for evaluation of role of the NLRP3 gene polymorphism in the genetic risks and treatment outcomes associated with psoriasis is still required.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Psoriasis is an immune-mediated disease that affects the whole body and is characterized by inflammation in the skin and joints [1]. Psoriasis is a condition characterized by excessive production of the outermost layer of the skin, resulting in the formation of localized red, itchy, and scaly patches [2]. In more severe cases, these patches can extend to cover the entire body. Psoriasis has a global prevalence of 1–3%, with variations observed across different ethnic groups and geographical areas. Psoriasis is a complex disease with multiple causes, including genetic factors (specifically related to the immune system or skin) and non-genetic factors. The non-genetic factors include imbalances among CD4 + T cell subsets, which contribute to the thickening and abnormal shedding of skin cells, as well as environmental risk factors such as exposure to UV radiation, certain medications, smoking, alcohol consumption, infections, and stress [3].

There is a synchronized connection between the innate and adaptive immune system. The impact of the NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome on this connection has been demonstrated in many studies [4]. The NLRP3 inflammasome is a complex protein structure that starts a type of cell death associated with inflammation and stimulates the release of proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 [5]. The NLRP3 inflammasome has been associated with several diseases, such as psoriasis [3]. The NLRP3 (rs10754558) gene polymorphism serves as a significant diagnostic biomarker in individuals with psoriasis and has the potential to be a valuable tool in therapeutic therapy [2].

Psoriasis can be treated using several methods, including topical medications, phototherapy, conventional systemic medicines like methotrexate, small molecules, and biologics. Various therapies exhibit different levels of effectiveness, safety, speed of response, and long-term response sustainability. They also differ in terms of treatment administration processes, including frequency, duration, and convenience, as well as treatment costs [6]. Referral to a dermatologist may be necessary for the examination and the use of systemic therapy in cases that are more severe and resistant [7].

Various genetic regulatory systems, including NLRP3 polymorphism, could potentially be involved in disease susceptibility and response to anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) medications [4]. The association of NLRP3 (rs10754558) gene polymorphism, TNFα and CRP with disease severity and their role as biomarkers for response to different systemic therapy in psoriasis have not been explored to date. To investigate this a critical issue, the aim of this research is to evaluate the NLRP3 (rs10754558) gene polymorphism, the serum level of CRP and TNFα in psoriasis patients and assessment of the NLRP3 (rs10754558) gene polymorphism, CRP and TNFα with disease severity and their role as biomarkers for response to Methotrexate and Adalimumab in psoriasis.

Methodology

Study design and subjects

This case-control study with a sample size of 75 individuals diagnosed with psoriasis vulgaris and 75 healthy individuals serving as a control group, that was calculated at confidence interval (CI) 95% and power 80% [8]. Inclusion criteria involved patients aged 18–60 years old, clinically diagnosed with psoriasis, and exhibiting varying degrees of psoriasis vulgaris severity. The medical professional conducted a comprehensive assessment, including a detailed medical history, a thorough examination of the body and skin, and an analysis of the location and spread of the skin lesions, both on the central body and the limbs. The disease severity and extent were clinically assessed using the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score. The PASI score is derived from a subjective assessment of the skin lesions, taking into account the severity of symptoms such as redness, swelling, and flaking, as well as the proportion of the affected skin area. Mild psoriasis is characterized by a PASI score of less than 10, while moderate psoriasis falls within the range of 10 to 20. A PASI score higher than 20 indicates severe psoriasis [9, 10].

Seventy-five psoriatic patients presented for the first time with moderate to severe psoriasis. According to the records, some of the selected patients received intramuscular methotrexate by starting dose of 7.5 mg weekly and titrated to a maximum dose of 0.4 mg/kg/week according to clinical response for maximum 6 months while the others received adalimumab at 80 mg as a starting dose on day 1 then 40 mg after 1 week then 40 mg every other week. The median duration of treatment in patients received methotrexate was 9 months (range:3–48 months), whereas the median duration of treatment in patients received adalimumab was 3 months (range:2–4 months). In those patients’ sheets, baseline PASI score was calculated and recorded before starting the therapy while therapeutic PASI score was assessed 3 months after the end of the treatment course. Responder to therapy is defined from calculation PASI 50 response which means achievement of at least 50% reduction in PASI score from baseline, but treatment failure is defined when an improvement of PASI of 50% is not achieved [11].

This study was conducted at the Immunology Research Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University. Cases were recruited from patient records of the psoriasis unit at the dermatology department of Zagazig University Hospitals, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig, Egypt. The study took place between 2022 and 2023. The study excluded any subject that had one or more of the following conditions: chronic inflammatory diseases such as tuberculosis, aspergillosis, and chronic hepatitis; systemic immunological disorders such as systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic sclerosis; malignancy; ischemic heart diseases; heart failure; and cerebrovascular events.

Ethical approvals

This research has been approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). Prior to their enrollment in this study, all individuals provided written consent. This research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. The approval number for this study is (IRB#11,123- 17/10/2023).

NLRP3 (rs10754558) gene polymorphism analysis

Following the manufacturer’s instructions, genomic DNA was extracted from 2 milliliters of EDTA-anticoagulated venous blood using a genomic DNA extraction kit (GeneJET, Thermo Scientific, USA, Cat. no. K078). The concentration and purity of the extracted genomic DNA were measured using the Nanodrop 2000 (Thermofischer Scientific, Wilmingiton, DE, USA) at 260 nm absorbance with a ratio between (1.7–1.8) for A260 /A280. The samples were stored at -20oC until they were needed.

Real-Time PCR was used to assess the polymorphism of the NLRP3 (rs10754558) gene (Applied Biosystems®7500, USA). To prepare the genotyping reaction mix, TaqMan universal master mix II (2x) was used. Table 1 displays the NLRP3 rs10754558 primer sequence. Utilizing TaqMan® MGB probes with a reporter dye at each probe’s 5´ ends, VIC® dye was coupled to the Allele 1 probe’s 5´ end, and 6FAMTM dye was linked to the Allele 2 probe’s 5´ end.

Table 1 NLRP3 (rs10754558) primers
Full size table

Serum TNFα levels

In the immunology research lab, serum samples were drawn 3 months after the end of the treatment under strict aseptic conditions and stored at -20 °C until analysis. ELISA [Bioassay Technology Laboratory, China] was used to detect TNFα in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Every sample was processed in duplicate, and an ELISA reader (Stat Fax ® 303 Plus) was used to calculate the mean absorbance. To determine the concentration of “serum TNF-α,” calibration curves were employed. The measurements of serum TNFα were made in units of ng/L, with a sensitivity limit of 1.52 ng/L.

Serum CRP levels

The nephelometric method (Quest Diagnostics, Madison, NJ, USA), with an analytical sensitivity of 0.2 mg/L, was used to measure the serum concentrations of CRP.

Statistical analysis

The quantitative variables were tested for normality. Comparisons between quantitative variables were performed using independent sample t-tests for parametric data or Mann–Whitney test and Kruskal Wallis test for nonparametric data. The genotype/allele frequencies were analyzed by chi-square (χ2) test. Odds rations (ORs) and 95% CIs were determined whenever χ2 or Fisher’s exact test was significant Correlation between levels of TNF-α in serum and PASI score in psoriasis patients were assessed using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Statistical significance was defined as having P values below 0.05. The results were obtained using the Statistical Package of Social Services (SPSS, version 22, Chicago, IL, USA). The MedCalc Software Ltd. Odds Ratio (OR) Calculator is used to determine the OR and CI 95% (https://www.medcalc.org/calc/odds_ratio.php (Version 22.018; accessed January 17, 2024).

Results

Baselines characteristics of study groups

Our study involved 75 psoriasis patients, A total of 37 females (49.3%) and 38 males (50.7%), the mean age in all patients was 36.33 ± 9.16 years and 75 controls with 41females (54.7%) and 34 males (45.3%) and the mean age in all controls was 35.83 ± 9.62 with no significant difference between the studied groups regarding gender and age (P = 0.624,742).

The baselines characteristics of psoriasis patients were shown in Table 2. Although there was no statistically significant difference between responders and non-responders as regards age, gender, family history, duration of treatment, baseline PASI score and therapeutic PASI (P > 0.05), there was a statistically significant difference as regards severity (P = 0.002). In the responders, there were 18(60%) moderate cases and 12(40%) severe cases while there were 4 (8.9%) mild cases,10(22.2%) moderate cases,31(68.9%) severe cases in the non-responders.

Table 2 Baseline characteristics of psoriasis cases (N = 75)
Full size table

NLRP3 genotypes and alleles among the studied groups

Genotypic frequencies of NLRP3 (rs10754558) gene were noticed in line with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in controls (χ2 = 2.56; P = 0.11) and cases (χ2 = 2.39; P = 0.12). There was a highly significant difference in NLRP3 genotypes and alleles distribution between psoriasis patients and controls (P = 0.002,0.004). The most predominant genotype in psoriasis patients was GC (58.7%) compared to GG (52%) in controls as shown in Table 3. The percentage of allele G was 69.3%, and 53.3% in controls and psoriasis patients respectively (P = 0.005). The carriers of allele C were at risk of psoriasis by 1.98 times (OR = 1.98, 95%CI:1.22–3.17, P = 0.005). Furthermore, the GC genotype (OR = 3.67, 95%CI:1.75–7.68, P = 0.0006), was linked with increased risk of psoriasis.

Table 3 Distribution of NLRP3 (rs10754558) genotypes and alleles among the studied groups
Full size table

Relations between NLRP3 (rs10754558) gene with several clinical characteristics in psoriasis cases were shown in Table 4. Regarding disease severity in psoriasis patients, there was statistically significant difference among NLRP3 genotypes (P < 0.001). About 72.7% of GC genotypes were severe while 55.6% of GG genotypes were severe. The distribution of NLRP3 allele and genotypes according to PASI 50 response and methotrexate response were displayed in Tables 5 and 6. The heterozygote genotype was significantly linked with nonresponse to psoriasis therapy (OR = 11.7, 95%CI:3.24–42.28, P = 0.0002) and particularly with nonresponse to methotrexate (OR = 86.3, 95%CI:13.02–572.60, P < 0.0001).

Table 4 Relations between NLRP3 (rs10754558) genotypes with different clinical parameters in psoriasis patients (n = 75)
Full size table
Table 5 Distribution of NLRP3 (rs10754558) genotypes and alleles according to PASI 50 response
Full size table
Table 6 Distribution of NLRP3 (rs10754558) genotypes and alleles according to methotrexate response
Full size table

There was highly statistically significant variance between psoriasis patients and controls as regards serum CRP and TNFα levels (P < 0.00001). Moreover, there was highly statistically significant variance in serum CRP and TNFα levels between responders and non-responders in psoriasis patients as regards PASI 50 (P < 0.0001). While there was no significant difference as regards treatment line (P > 0.05) as shown in Table 7. Levels of serum CRP and TNFα in NLRP3 genotypes of psoriasis patients were significantly different (P < 0.00001). There was significant correlation between levels of TNFα in serum and PASI score (p < 0.05) as shown in Fig. 1.

Table 7 Serum levels of CRP and TNF-α among the studied groups
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Correlation between levels of TNF-α in serum and PASI score in psoriasis patients. * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)

Full size image

Discussion

Psoriasis is an inflammatory illness caused by an immune response. Its exact cause is unknown; however, it may be related to problems with the growth and specialization of skin cells called keratinocytes. This results in infiltration with inflammatory cells, specifically T-lymphocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils. Psoriasis has a prevalence of 1–3% among adults with numerous extracutaneous manifestations [12]. Psoriasis is a persistent and recurring condition that often requires prolonged treatment. The selection of treatment for psoriasis is based on the severity of the disease, the presence of other medical conditions, and the availability of healthcare services. Psoriatic patients are commonly classified into two categories: mild or moderate to severe psoriasis, based on the clinical severity of the lesions, the extent of affected body surface area, and the impact on the patient’s quality of life [13].

The NLRP3 inflammasome is activated in inflammatory skin conditions. Stimulation of NLRP3 inflammasomes has been demonstrated to result in an inflammatory response mostly caused by increased production of IL1b and IL-18. These cytokines play crucial roles in both host defense and inflammation by activating innate immune responses [3]. This study aimed to evaluate the NLRP3 (rs10754558) gene polymorphism, the serum level of CRP and TNFα in psoriasis patients and assessment of the NLRP3 (rs10754558) gene polymorphism, CRP and TNFα with disease severity and their role as biomarkers for response to Methotrexate and Adalimumab in psoriasis. Non statistically significant difference concerning age and gender was noticed between the studied groups (P > 0.05). This was consistent with Parisi et al. who reported that psoriasis affects any age, but most cases occur before 35 years old [14]. Furthermore, Guillet et al. found that the prevalence and manifestation of psoriasis of the skin are similar between different sexes [15].

This research revealed a significant statistical association between genotypes GC, CC, and allele C, and an increased susceptibility to psoriasis. The prevalence of Genotype GC and CC in psoriatic patients was 58.7% and 17.3%, respectively, compared to 34.7% and 13.3% in controls. This demonstrates that the presence of Genotype GC raises the risk of psoriasis by about 3.7 times, while the presence of Genotype CC elevates the risk by about 2.8 times. Moreover, the presence of allele C was associated with a 1.9-fold increase in the risk of psoriasis. These results were consistent with an Egyptian study that conducted by ALrefaiet al. [3]. The finding of another interesting Egyptian study displayed that the GC genotype was the predominant genotype in individuals with psoriasis, accounting for 60.9% of patients compared to 34.4% in the control group. This genotype was associated with a six-fold increase in the susceptibility to psoriasis. The prevalence of genotype CC in psoriatic patients was 23.4%, whereas it was 9.4% in controls. This genotype was associated with a nearly 9-fold increase in the susceptibility to psoriasis. Furthermore, allele C exhibited a significant prevalence in individuals with psoriasis (53.9%) compared to the control group (26.6%), hence increasing the susceptibility to psoriasis by approximately three times [2]. Although our result was similar to Faraget al. in prevalence in Genotype GC in psoriasis patients compared to controls, there was difference in other findings. This can be explained by difference of inclusion criteria of study population. Our study only included moderate to severe psoriasis. The prevalence of GG genotype (24%) was higher than prevalence of CC genotype (17.3%) in psoriasis patients in our study while in Faraget al. prevalence of CC genotype (23.4%) was higher than prevalence of GG genotype (15.6%) in psoriasis patients. Additionally, severe cases of psoriasis patients in this study represented about 72.7% of GC genotype and 7.7% of CC genotype while in Faraget al. represented 10.3% of GC genotype and 40% CC genotype.

The gene polymorphism of NLRP3 (rs10754558) has the potential to influence both the stability and expression of its mRNA. The presence of the rs10754558 C allele leads to a decrease in the stability of NLRP3 mRNA, as compared to the rs10754558 G allele [16]. The NLRP3 rs10754558-G allele is associated with elevated IL-18 levels, indicating that this single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) may regulate the activation of inflammasomes and contribute to undesirable inflammatory consequences [17]. There was a statistically significant difference in disease severity among psoriasis patients based on their NLRP3 genotypes (P < 0.001). This research found a strong association between the GC genotype of NLRP3 and severe psoriasis. Conversely, ALrefai et al. and Farag et al. observed a strong association between the GC genotype of NLRP3 and mild psoriasis. This can be attributed to the difference in number of patients distributed according to severity [2, 3].

An experimental study in a mouse model of imiquimod-induced psoriasis concluded that treatment with an inflammasome blocker caused reduced expression of pNF-kB, pSTAT-3, IL-6, and TNFα [18]. These results reveal that NLRP3 inflammasomes play an important role in psoriatic inflammation and therapy. Current evidence-based guidelines from Europe and national authorities recommend the use of topical medications for treating mild cases of psoriasis. According to Girolomoni et al. traditional synthetic (TS) medicines are the preferred initial therapy for moderate to severe disease. Biologic therapies are advised only if TS drugs are not well-tolerated or do not effectively control the disease [19]. According to Jiang et al. there is an opinion that administering biologics at an early stage of the disease could potentially counteract the inflammatory effects related to psoriasis comorbidities, hence impacting long-term outcomes [20].

Consequently, it is fundamental to predict the response of psoriasis patients to systemic therapy. This study is the first to investigate the association between the NLRP3 (rs10754558) gene polymorphism and response to psoriasis therapy. The study revealed a significant association between the GC genotype of NLRP3 (rs10754558) with nonresponse to psoriasis medication. The OR was 11.7, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 3.24–42.28, and a p-value of 0.0002. This was consistent with Awni et al. who studied the role of NLRP3 rs4612666 gene polymorphism as a predictor for anti-TNF α-responsiveness in rheumatoid arthritis patients. They reported that NLRP3 rs4612666 gene polymorphism was related with higher disease activity and lower response to TNFα -inhibitors [4].

A highly statistically significant difference between psoriasis patients and controls was noted as regards serum CRP and TNFα levels (P < 0.00001). Moreover, there was highly statistically significant difference in serum CRP and TNFα levels between responders and non-responders in psoriasis patients as regards PASI 50 (P < 0.0001). Similarly, Farshchian et al. reported that baseline CRP levels among psoriatic patients were higher than normal [21]. Moreover, Strober et al. and Demir et al. concluded that clinical response in psoriasis patients was associated with greater CRP reductions [22, 23]. Concerning TNFα levels in response to psoriasis therapy, several studies found that serum levels of TNFα in patients with psoriasis were significantly higher than in the control group. Besides, Furiati et al., 2019 reported that patients on methotrexate or anti-TNF therapy produced significantly lower levels of TNFα [4, 24,25,26,27,28].

The results of this study showed a significant (p < 0.05) association between the PASI score and serum TNF-α levels in psoriasis patients. Our result agreed with Abdel-Hamid et al.and Hagag et al. who reported that the difference in severity level (PASI) was found to be significantly correlated with serum TNFα level, supporting the role of this cytokine as main parameter for disease severity [27, 29]. On the other hand, Ovcina-Kurtovic and Kasumagic-Halilovic revealed that in psoriasis patients, there was no statistically significant association (p > 0,05) between the serum level of TNFα and the PASI score. This may be due to the small sample size of patients and controls, different populations, and genetic factors [28]. The GC genotype of NLRP3 showed the highest serum CRP and TNFα levels (50.1 mg/L, 350 ng/L) which was in line with highest therapeutic PASI score. Additionally, about 72.7% of severe cases were GC genotype. This means that this GC genotype of NLRP3 linked with disease severity and the serum levels of CRP and TNFα can be used as marker for disease activity.

Limitations of the study: the numbers of some subgroups are too small based on disease severity and therapy, which may reduce our analytical power. We recommend further research in more wide scale. Another limitation is that other lines of biological treatment were not included in the study and patient adherence to prescribed regimens between registry visits was not evaluated.

Conclusion

The NLRP3 (rs10754558) genotypes GC was associated with the severe form of psoriasis and with nonresponse to psoriasis medication. Therefore, NLRP3 (rs10754558) gene polymorphism is an important prognostic biomarker in psoriasis patients. The serum TNFα can be used as a predictor for response to therapy in psoriasis patients. More research for evaluation of role of the NLRP3 gene polymorphism in the genetic risks and treatment outcomes associated with psoriasis is still required.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Verma D, Fekri SZ, Sigurdardottir G, Bivik Eding C, Sandin C, Enerbäck C. Enhanced inflammasome activity in patients with Psoriasis promotes systemic inflammation. J Invest Dermatol. 2021;141(3):586–e5955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2020.07.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Farag A, Badr E, Elnaidany N, Gaafar N, Elmadbouh I. Association of NLRP1 (rs878329) and NLRP3 (rs10754558) genes polymorphism in psoriasis vulgaris patients with dyslipidemia. Hum Gene. 2022;33:201052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humgen.2022.201052.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. ALrefai A, Dawood A, Shehata W, Elhelbawy M, Elhelbawy N. Evaluation of NLRP3 (rs10754558) and PTPN22 (1858 C/T) (rs2476601) functional polymorphisms in Psoriasis susceptibility in Egypt. Appl Clin Genet. 2021;26(14):331–9. https://doi.org/10.2147/TACG.S319065. PMID: 34345180; PMCID: PMC8324977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Awni AA, Hamed ZO, Abdul-Hassan Abbas A, Abdulamir AS. Effect of NLRP3 inflammasome genes polymorphism on disease susceptibility and response to TNF-α inhibitors in Iraqi patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Heliyon. 2023;9(6):e16814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16814. PMID: 37332933; PMCID: PMC10275785.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang L, Ren W, Wu Q, et al. NLRP3 inflammasome activation: a therapeutic target for cerebral ischemia-reperfusion Injury. Front Mol Neurosci. 2022;15:847440. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2022.847440. PMID: 35600078; PMCID: PMC9122020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Balieva FN, Catton L, Claréus BW, et al. Treatment preferences in young adults with moderate to severe psoriasis: a qualitative study from the nordic Countries. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-023-00973-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim WB, Jerome D, Yeung J. Diagnosis and management of psoriasis. Can Fam Physician. 2017;63(4):278–85. PMID: 28404701; PMCID: PMC5389757.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Uaratanawong R, Uaratanawong S, Chunhasewee C, Chawvavanich P. High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Level and Psoriasis Severity in Thai Patients. J Med Assoc Thai. 2016;99(9):1039-45. PMID: 29927210.

  9. Sirin MC, Korkmaz S, Erturan I, et al. Evaluation of monocyte to HDL cholesterol ratio and other inflammatory markers in patients with psoriasis. Bras Dermatol. 2020;95:575–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yazdanpanah MJ, Vahabi-Amlashi S, Nematy M, Shaelaei N, Mohajeri SAR, Tafazzoli Z. Association of serum lipid profiles and dietary intakes of vitamin E and fiber with psoriasis severity. Casp J Intern Med. 2021;12:606–12.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carlin CS, Feldman SR, Krueger JG, Menter A, Krueger GG. A 50% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) is a clinically significant endpoint in the assessment of psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50:859–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rajguru JP, Maya D, Kumar D, Suri P, Bhardwaj S, Patel ND. Update on psoriasis: a review. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2020;9(1):20–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_689_19. PMID: 32110559; PMCID: PMC7014874.

  13. Rendon A, Schäkel K. Psoriasis pathogenesis and treatment. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(6):1475. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20061475. PMID: 30909615; PMCID: PMC6471628.

  14. Parisi R, Iskandar IYK, Kontopantelis E, Augustin M, Griffiths CEM, Ashcroft DM. Global psoriasis Atlas. National, regional, and worldwide epidemiology of psoriasis: systematic analysis and modelling study. BMJ. 2020;28:369:m1590. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1590. PMID: 32467098; PMCID: PMC7254147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Guillet C, Seeli C, Nina M, Maul LV, Maul JT. The impact of gender and sex in psoriasis: what to be aware of when treating women with psoriasis. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2022;13(2):e010. https://doi.org/10.1097/JW9.0000000000000010. PMID: 35619672; PMCID: PMC9112394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hitomi Y, Ebisawa M, Tomikawa M, et al. Associations of functional NLRP3 polymorphisms with susceptibility to food-induced anaphy laxis and aspirin-induced asthma. J Allerg Clin Immunol. 2009;124(4):779–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ravimohan S, Nfanyana K, Tamuhla N, Tiemessen CT, Weissma D, Bisson GP. Common variation in NLRP3Is associated with early death and elevated inflammasome biomarkers among advanced HIV/TB co-infected patients in Botswana. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018;5:75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Irrera N, Vaccaro M, Bitto A, et al. BAY 11-7082 inhibits the NF-κB and NLRP3 infl ammasome pathways and protects against IMQ-induced psoriasis. Clin Sci (Lond). 2017;131:487–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Girolomoni G, Savage L, Gisondi P, et al. Increasing Access to Effective systemic treatments in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Narrative Rev Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023;13:2171–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang Y, Chen Y, Yu Q, Shi Y. Biologic and small-molecule therapies for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: focus on psoriasis comorbidities. BioDrugs. 2023;37(1):35–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Farshchian M, Ansar A, Sobhan M, Hoseinpoor V. C-reactive protein serum level in patients with psoriasis before and after treatment with narrow-band ultraviolet B. Bras Dermatol 2016 Sep-Oct;91(5):580–3. https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20164655. PMID: 27828628; PMCID: PMC5087213.

  22. Strober BE, Poulin Y, Teller C, Wang Y, Williams DA, Goldblum OM. Changes in C-reactive protein in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis switched to adalimumab therapy after suboptimal response to etanercept, methotrexate or phototherapy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28(12):1701–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.12372. Epub 2014 Jan 15. PMID: 24422992.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Demir D, Aktaş E, Kıvanc AI, Ozturk F. Impact of treatment with methotrexate and TNF alpha inhibitors on insulin resistance in patients with psoriasis. Turkiye Klinikleri Dermatoloji. 2020;30:35–43. https://doi.org/10.5336/dermato.2020-74503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Verghese B, Bhatnagar S, Tanwar R, Bhattacharjee J. Serum cytokine profile in psoriasis-a case-control study in a tertiary care hospital from northern India. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2011;26(4):373–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kyriakou A, Patsatsi A, Vyzantiadis TA, Sotiriadis D. Serum levels of TNF-α,IL-12/23 p40,andIL-17 in Psoriatic Patients with and without nail psoriasis: a cross-sectional study. Sci World J. 2014;1–4.

  26. Furiati SC, Catarino JS, Silva MV, et al. Th1, Th17, and Treg responses are differently modulated by TNF-α inhibitors and methotrexate in Psoriasis patients. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):7526. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43899-9. PMID: 31101850; PMCID: PMC6525159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hagag MM, Ghazy MM, Elhelbawy NG. Tumor necrosis factor α gene promoter 308 and 238 polymorphisms and its serum level in psoriasis. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2021;27(2021):101050.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ovcina-Kurtovic N, Kasumagic-Halilovic E. Serum levels of Tumor Necrosis factor - alpha in patients with psoriasis. Mater Sociomed. 2022;34(1):40–3. https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2022.33.40-43. PMID: 35801072; PMCID: PMC9229364.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Abdel-Hamid MF, Aly DG, Saad NE, Emam HM, Ayoub DF. Serum levels of interleukin-8, tumor necrosis factor-α and γ-interferon in Egyptian psoriatic patients and correlation with disease severity. Dermatol. 2011;38(5):442–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors greatly thank doctors who work at the Medical Scientific Research Center at the Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University for their help with great thanks to Dr Mariem Ali Soliman.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

    Fatma Z. Kamel, Ghada Boghdadi & Alia A. El Shahawy

  2. Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

    Heba Allah Mohamed Hoseiny

  3. Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

    Aya A. El Shahawy

  4. College of Medicine, Ibn Sina National College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Ghada Boghdadi

Authors
  1. Fatma Z. Kamel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heba Allah Mohamed Hoseiny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aya A. El Shahawy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ghada Boghdadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alia A. El Shahawy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FK analyzed data samples and the investigations. Alia E performed statistical analysis, interpretation and presentation of the results. FK and Alia E wrote the main manuscript text and. HM., Aya E, and GB reviewed and edited. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alia A. El Shahawy.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study was carried out in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Zagazig University (IRB# 11123- 17/10/2023).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamel, F.Z., Hoseiny, H.A.M., Shahawy, A.A.E. et al. NLRP3 (rs10754558) gene polymorphism and tumor necrosis factor alpha as predictors for disease activity and response to methotrexate and adalimumab in psoriasis. BMC Immunol 25, 40 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12865-024-00630-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12865-024-00630-2

Keywords

BMC Immunology

ISSN: 1471-2172

Contact us