Skip to main content
Download PDF

ThPOK inhibits the immune escape of gastric cancer cells by inducing STPG1 to inactivate the ERK pathway

BMC Immunology volume 23, Article number: 16 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Gastric cancer is the second most frequently diagnosed cancer worldwide. Weak immunogenicity helps cancer cells escape from immune elimination and grow into predominant subpopulations. This study aimed to investigate the effect of Zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7B (Zbtb7b, Alias ThPOK) on T cell activation after coculture with gastric cancer cells.

Methods

Cell Counting Kit-8 assay (CCK-8) was performed to explore the viability of gastric cancer cells. Flow cytometry analysis was used to measure CD3+ T cell proliferation and the ratio of activated IFN-γ+ T cells which were co-incubated with gastric cancer cells (HGC-27, SNU-1). The binding between ThPOK and the promoter of its target sperm tail PG-rich repeat containing 1 (STPG1) was explored using ChIP and luciferase reporter assays. Relative gene expression was quantified using RT-qPCR.

Results

ThPOK was expressed at a low level in gastric cancer tissues and cells at mRNA and protein levels. Gastric cancer patients with lower ThPOK expression had poorer prognosis. ThPOK overexpression suppressed gastric cancer cell viability and increased T cell activation. ThPOK served as a transcription factor for STPG1. STPG1 expression was also at a low level in the tissues and cells of gastric cancer. ThPOK positively regulated the mRNA and protein levels of STPG1 in gastric cancer cells. Moreover, ThPOK was demonstrated to bind with STPG1 promoter. STPG1 upregulation also exerted inhibitory effects on gastric cancer cell viability and T cell activation. Additionally, ThPOK and STPG1 were revealed to inactivate the ERK pathway in gastric cancer cells.

Conclusion

ThPOK inhibits gastric cancer cell viability and increases T cell activation by inducing STPG1 to inactivate the ERK pathway.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer related death globally [1]. Helicobacter pylori infection is a primary risk factor for GC, accounting for 90% of new cases of noncardia gastric cancer [2, 3]. There are also other risk factors such as diet, alcohol consumption and smoking [4]. In 2018, over a million new cases are diagnosed of gastric cancer with about 5.7% of all cancer cases worldwide [5]. With a 5-year survival rate of < 25%, gastric cancer patients show no noticeable symptoms in the early stage, and are often observed with distant metastasis that is incurable [6, 7]. Therefore, it is imperative to explore and understand the underlying regulatory mechanisms involved in gastric cancer.

Effector cells preferentially clear high immunogenic tumor cells under the surveillance of the immune system [8]. The weak immunogenicity helps cancer cells to escape from immune elimination and grow into the predominant subpopulations [9]. The effective tumor cell clearance needs both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. CD4+ T lymphocytes have been reported to regulate the onset and maintenance of the adaptive immune response [10].

Zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7B (Zbtb7b, Alias ThPOK) is a member of the POK family of transcription factors, characterized by a Kruppel-like zinc-finger domain responsible for DNA binding and a regulatory POZ/BTB domain mediating interactions with other factors [11]. ThPOK is a transcription factor that is required by the emergence of memory CD4+ T cells which mediate long term immunity [12]. Increasing studies have revealed the implication of ThPOK in various cancers. For example, ThPOK has been reported to play a critical role in regulating the immune response against colorectal cancer cells [13]. Moreover, it has been documented that ThPOK is selectively expressed in thymocytes while developing to the CD4 lineage. The aberrant expression of ThPOK is associated with high incidence of T-cell lymphomas [14]. However, the function and regulatory mechanism of ThPOK in gastric cancer remain elusive.

Extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) are part of the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) [15], an evolutionary conserved family of proteins modulating mitosis, survival, apoptosis, differentiation, and metabolism [16]. ERKs are activated in response to extracellular stimuli and finely sense changes in the tumor microenvironment, producing adaptive responses of cancer cells [17, 18]. Previous studies revealed that ERK1/2 promotes an immune-evasive phenotype in various tumors including breast [19], liver [20], prostate [21], colon [22], non-small cell lung [23] cancers, and gastrointestinal sarcomas [24]. In the present study, the ERK pathway in gastric cancer cells after coculture with T cells was also studied.

In the present study, we aimed to explore the expression profile and the effect of ThPOK on gastric cancer cell viability and T cell activation after coculture with gastric cancer cells. The findings may provide insights in the exploration of gastric cancer treatments.

Material and methods

Bioinformatics analysis

The Kaplan–Meier plotter (https://kmplot.com/analysis/) was used for analyzing the association of ThPOK expression and overall survival of patients with stomach adenocarcinoma based on Pan-cancer Atlas [25]. The target genes of ThPOK were predicted by the HTFtarget database (http://bioinfo.life.hust.edu.cn/hTFtarget#!/).

Sample collection

The gastric cancer tissue samples (n = 21) and matched adjacent normal tissue samples (n = 21) were collected from gastric cancer patients during operation at the Sixth Hospital of Wuhan, Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University (Hubei, China). Clinical characteristics of patients were provided in Table 1. All participants had received no radiosurgery or chemosurgery before the operation. The collected tissue samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen at − 80 °C for subsequent experiments. Twenty to thirty micrometer sections (depending on tissue size) were used for RNA/protein extraction. All samples had at least 80% tumor cell content as assessed by two pathologists. Healthy blood donors were healthy physicians from the Sixth Hospital of Wuhan, Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University. The study was under the approval of the Ethics Committee of the Sixth Hospital of Wuhan, Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University (Hubei, China). The written informed consents have been signed by all participants before the study.

Table 1 Association of ThPOK with clinical features of gastric cancer patients
Full size table

Cell culture

The normal gastric mucosal cells (GES-1, catalog number: CL-0563) were provided by Procell company (Wuhan, Hubei, China). The human gastric cancer cells (HGC-27, catalog number: RCB0500, RCB; SNU-1, CRL-5971, ATCC) were purchased from the Riken Cell bank and American type culture collection. Cells were cultured in Dulbeccoʼs modified Eagleʼs medium (Sigma-Aldrich) containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Biochrom, Cambridge, UK) at 37 °C in 5% CO2.

Isolation and identification of T cells

Blood samples were collected from healthy controls. The centrifuge was added with heparin anticoagulant, and the serum was removed. Haemocytes were lysed with red blood cell lysis buffer at room temperature for 10 min. After centrifugation for 5 min, the supernatant was removed. Cell pellets were washed and resuspended in bioclean phosphate buffer saline solution (5 mL) followed by cell counting. CD3 positive cells were selected using flow cytometry.

In vitro cell co‐culture

105 CFSE (Beijing Solabio Life Sciences Co., Ltd)-labelled CD3+ T cells [26] were cocultured with SGC7901 and SNU-1 cells at a ratio of 5:1 in a 96‐well plate with the medium containing 20 IU/mL recombinant human Interleukin‐2 (rhIL‐2), 2 μg/mL anti‐CD3, and 1 μg/mL anti‐CD28. Subsequently, flow cytometry was employed to reveal the percentage of proliferated T cells.

Cell transfection

The short hairpin RNA against ThPOK (sh-ThPOK#1/2) or STPG1 (sh-STPG1) and corresponding negative control (sh-NC), pcDNA3.1-ThPOK, pcDNA3.1-STPG1 and empty vector (pcDNA3.1-NC) were constructed by RiboBio (Guangzhou, China). The indicated plasmids were transfected into HGC-27 and SNU-1 cells for 48 h using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen).

RT-qPCR

The TRIzol Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) was used for RNA isolation from HGC-27 and SNU-1 cells, and the collected RNA was then reverse transcribed into cDNA by PrimeScript Reverse Transcriptase Kit (Takara, Shiga, Japan). PCR was performed using SYBR ® Premix ExTaq ™ II kit (Takara). The gene expression of ThPOK and STPG1 was calculated with the 2−∆∆Ct method. GAPDH served as the internal control. This experiment was repeated at least three times. The primer sequences are as follows:

ThPOK:

  • F: 5′-TCGATTCACCAGGAACGAC-3′,

  • R: 5′-TCTTGAGGTCGTAGCTGTG-3′;

STPG1:

  • F: 5′-ACTATTACAATGCCTCTGTCTC-3′,

  • R: 5′-CGAAAGATCCTCTTTGGGT-3′;

GAPDH:

  • F: 5′-CCTCCTGTTCGACAGTCAG-3′,

  • R: 5′-CATACGACTGCAAAGACCC-3′;

Western blotting

Radio Immunoprecipitation Assay (RIPA) lysis buffer was applied for protein extraction from gastric cancer tissues and cells. After culturing on ice for 30 min, gastric tissue samples were centrifuged at 12,000 r/min for 10 min at 4 °C to collect the supernatant. The protein concentration was determined using a BCA kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Subsequently, the proteins were isolated by 10% SDS-PAGE. Subsequently, each well was uploaded with 50 μg of protein sample, which was next transferred to PVDF membranes. Non-fat milk (5%) was used to block the membranes for 2 h. The membranes were incubated with the primary antibodies, including anti-ThPOK (#ab228680, 1:500, Abcam), anti-STPG1 (#PA5-49489, 1:2000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rochester, NY, USA), anti-p-ERK-1/2 (#44-680G, 1:1000, Abcam), anti-ERK-1/2 (#ab184699, 1:10,000, Abcam) at 4 °C overnight with GAPDH as the internal reference. Next, these membranes were incubated with the secondary antibody for 1 h in the dark at room temperature. The protein bands were visualized using the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection system (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Cell counting kit-8 assay

The transfected HGC-27 and SNU-1 cells (1000 cells/well) were grown into 96-well plates. At specific time point (0, 24, 48, 72 h), 10 μL of CCK-8 solution (Dojindo, Tokyo, Japan) was added into each well and cultured for another 4 h. Microplate reader (Reagen, Shenzhen, China) was used to detect the absorbance of HGC-27 and SNU-1 cells at 450 nm.

Flow cytometry analysis

After preparing the single cell suspension and resuspending the cells in the staining buff. PerCP-CD3 and Pacific blue-interferon-γ were added to culture with T cells. After immobilization and permeabilization, Pacific blue-IFN-γ was used. BD fluorescent-activated cell sorting canto II was used to measure the cells and flow Jo software was used for analysis [27, 28].

Luciferase reporter assay

Luciferase reporter assay was performed to explore the interaction between ThPOK and STPG1 promoter. Sequence of STPG1 promoter was subcloned into PGL3 vector (Promega), and the vectors carrying STPG1 promoter were cotransfected with sh-ThPOK#1/2 or sh-NC with Lipofectamine 3000 into HGC-27 and SNU-1 cells for 48 h. Next, the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) was used to analyze the relative luciferase activity of STPG1 promoter in gastric cancer cells.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay

ChIP assay kits (Upstate Biotechnology, Temacula, CA) were used to perform ChIP assays. The HGC-27 and SNU-1 cells were cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde (Thermo Fisher) for 10 min. After being centrifuged at 12,000g for 10 min at 4 °C, the obtained cell lysate was incubated with anti-ThPOK or anti-IgG. IgG functioned as a negative control. The collected DNA from the complexes by the DNA extraction kits (QIAGEN) was subjected to RT-qPCR analysis.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 21.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The results of experiments that were independently conducted for 3 times are shown by the mean ± SD. The Student’s t-test evaluated the two-group differences, while difference among multiple groups was compared by ANOVA. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to detect the survival in gastric cancer patients. p < 0.05 was regarded as statistical significance.

Results

ThPOK is downregulated in the tissues and cells of gastric cancer

ThPOK expression profile in the gastric cancer tissue samples was explored using RT-qPCR analysis. The downregulation of ThPOK was confirmed in gastric tissues compared with the normal adjacent tissues. The low protein expression of ThPOK was also confirmed in the tissues of gastric cancer patients (Fig. 1a). ThPOK expression is significantly associated with the T Staging of gastric cancer patients (Table 1). We measured the ThPOK expression in gastric cancer cells and normal gastric mucosal cells, the result of RT-qPCR and western blotting analyses indicated that mRNA and protein levels of ThPOK were both reduced in cell lines of gastric cancer than the control (Fig. 1b). The prediction on the Kaplan–Meier Plotter showed that gastric cancer patients with high levels of ThPOK were predicted with better prognosis (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1
figure 1

ThPOK is downregulated in the tissues and cells of gastric cancer. A ThPOK mRNA and protein expression in the tissues of gastric cancer patients and adjacent normal tissues was assessed using RT-qPCR analysis and western blotting. B The mRNA and protein levels of ThPOK in gastric cancer cells (HGC-27, SNU-1) and normal gastric mucosal cells (GES-1) were assessed by RT-qPCR and western blotting. C Kaplan–Meier Plotter (https://kmplot.com/analysis/) was used to predict the prognosis in gastric cancer patients with high or low level of ThPOK. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01

Full size image

ThPOK inhibits the immune escape of gastric cancer cells

Gain-of-function assays were performed to investigate the effect of ThPOK on T cellactivation after coculture with gastric cancers. First, the overexpression efficiency of ThPOK in gastric cancer cells was confirmed by RT-qPCR (Fig. 2a). According to the result of CCK-8 assay, the viability of gastric cancer cells was reduced after ThPOK overexpression (Fig. 2b). Gastric cancer cells (HGC-27, SNU-1) were co-cultured with T cells in vitro. The result of flow cytometry analysis indicated that the proliferation ability of CD3+ T cells as well as the ratio of IFN-γ+ T cells were both increased after ThPOK upregulation in comparison with the control group (Fig. 2c, d).

Fig. 2
figure 2

ThPOK inhibits the immune escape of gastric cancer cells. A ThPOK expression in gastric cancer cells transfected with OE-ThPOK and OE-NC was measured by RT-qPCR. B Gastric cancer cell viability was determined by CCK-8 assays after ThPOK overexpression. C and D Flow cytometry analysis was used to detect T cell proliferation and proportion of IFN-γ+ T cells after coculture with gastric cancer cells (HGC-27, SNU-1). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

Full size image

ThPOK induces upregulation of STPG1 in gastric cancer cells at the transcription level

STPG1 was on the top of the list of ThPOK target genes (Additional file 1) and was selected for further research. The result of RT-qPCR analysis indicated that STPG1 expression was lower in the tissues of gastric cancer patients than adjacent normal tissues (Fig. 3a). We measured its expression in gastric cancer cells using RT-qPCR. The result demonstrated that the low level of STPG1 was confirmed in cells of gastric cancer compared with the normal gastric mucosal cells (GES-1) (Fig. 3b). The knockdown efficiency of ThPOK in gastric cancer cells was verified. After the transfection of sh-ThPOK#1/2, the ThPOK mRNA and protein levels were reduced in gastric cancer cells (Fig. 3c). The effect of ThPOK knockdown on the expression of STPG1 was further explored. Moreover, a reduction in the mRNA and protein levels of STPG1 was observed in gastric cancer cells after the transfection of sh-ThPOK#1/2. Thus, ThPOK positively regulated STPG1 expression in gastric cancer cells (Fig. 3d). The interaction between ThPOK and promoter region of STPG1 was assessed using luciferase reporter assay. After the transfection of sh-ThPOK#1/2, the luciferase activity of the STPG1 promoter was reduced in gastric cancer cells (Fig. 3e). The result of ChIP assay showed that STPG1 was enriched in the precipitates of anti-ThPOK antibodies, which further confirmed the binding between ThPOK and STPG1 promoter (Fig. 3f).

Fig. 3
figure 3

ThPOK induces upregulation of STPG1 in gastric cancer cells at the transcription level. A STPG1 level in gastric cancer tissues (n = 21) and adjacent normal tissues (n = 21) was assessed by RT-qPCR. B The expression of STPG1 in gastric cancer cells (HGC-27, SNU-1) and normal gastric mucosal cells (GES-1) was assessed by RT-qPCR. C RT-qPCR and western blotting were used to measure the knockdown efficiency of ThPOK in gastric cancer cells. D STPG1 mRNA and protein expression in gastric cancer cells posttransfection of sh-ThPOK#1/2. E The binding between ThPOK and the promoter region of STPG1 after the transfection of sh-ThPOK#1/2 was explored by luciferase reporter assay. F ChIP assay was used to verify the binding between ThPOK and STPG1 promoter. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

Full size image

STPG1 inhibits the immune escape of gastric cancer cells

We further explored whether STPG1 affected T cell activation. The overexpression efficiency of STPG1 in gastric cancer cells was confirmed by RT-qPCR (Fig. 4a). The result of CCK-8 assay indicated that overexpressed STPG1 suppressed the viability of gastric cancer cells (Fig. 4b). According to flow cytometry analysis, STPG1 overexpression promoted the proliferation ability of CD3+ T cells as well as the ratio of IFN-γ+ T cells (Fig. 4c, d).

Fig. 4
figure 4

STPG1 inhibits the immune escape of gastric cancer cells. A STPG1 expression in gastric cancer cells posttransfection of OE-STPG1 or OE-NC was detected by RT-qPCR. B CCK-8 assay was conducted to assess the viability of gastric cancer cells with overexpression of STPG1. C and D Flow cytometry analysis was used to detect the percentage of proliferated CD3+ T cells and the proportion of IFN-γ+ T cells after co-culture with gastric cancer cells (HGC-27, SNU-1) which were transfected with STPG1 overexpression vectors. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

Full size image

ThPOK and STPG1 inactivate the ERK pathway

We further explored the effect of ThPOK and STPG1 on the downstream ERK signaling pathways. Figure 5a and b revealed that after coculture with T cells, the p-ERK-1/2 levels in gastric cancers were decreased. The result of western blotting indicated that the protein level of p-ERK-1/2 was significantly decreased after the overexpression of ThPOK and STPG1 in gastric cancer cells, and the ratio of p-ERK-1/2 to ERK-1/2 also showed a significant decrease in gastric cancer cells (Fig. 5c–f). All original western blot images were provided in Additional file 2.

Fig. 5
figure 5

ThPOK and STPG1 inactivate the ERK pathway. A and B p-ERK-1/2 and ERK-1/2 levels in gastric cancer cells after coculture with T cells. C and D Western blotting was used to detect the protein levels of p-ERK-1/2 and ERK-1/2 in gastric cancer cells transfected with OE-ThPOK or OE-NC. E and F The protein levels of p-ERK-1/2 and ERK-1/2 in gastric cancer cells after the transfection of OE-STPG1 or OE-NC. ***p < 0.001

Full size image

ThPOK promotes T cell activation by STPG1

Gastric cancer cells (HGC-27, SNU-1) were co-cultured with T cells in vitro. The viability of gastric cancer cells and the proliferation ability of CD3+ T cells as well as the ratio of IFN-γ+ T cells in response to ThPOK overexpression and STPG1 knockdown were evaluated using CCK-8 assays and flow cytometry analyses, respectively. Silencing of STPG1 rescued the suppressive effect of ThPOK overexpression on the viability of gastric cancer cells (Fig. 6a). The inhibitory impacts of ThPOK overexpression on the percentage of proliferated CD3+ T cells as well as the ratio of IFN-γ+ T cells were also partially restored by STPG1 knockdown (Fig. 6b–e).

Fig. 6
figure 6

ThPOK promotes T cell activation by STPG1. A Viability of gastric cancer cells under the conditions of OE-NC, OE-ThPOK, and OE-ThPOK + sh-STPG1 was detected by CCK-8 assay. Flow cytometry analysis was used to detect B and D the percentage of proliferated CD3+ T cells and C and E the proportion of IFN-γ+ T cells after coculture with gastric cancer cells (HGC-27, SNU-1) under the conditions of OE-NC, OE-ThPOK, and OE-ThPOK + sh-STPG1. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01

Full size image

Discussion

In our study, ThPOK was found to function as a tumor suppressor in gastric cancer. The expression of ThPOK was significantly downregulated in gastric cancer tissues and cells at both mRNA and protein levels. Moreover, the lower level of ThPOK was associated with poorer prognosis in gastric cancer patients. Gain-of-function assays showed that ThPOK overexpression suppressed the viability of gastric cancer cell lines and promoted T cell activation after coculture with gastric cancer cells.

ThPOK is an important transcription regulator and is critically involved in the commitment of some leucocytic lineages including helper, cytotoxic and natural killer T cells that define the aggressiveness and prognosis of various cancers, gastric cancer included [29]. In our study, ThPOK was revealed to serve as the transcription factor for STPG1. The low expression of STPG1 was also confirmed in the tissues and cells of gastric cancer. The mRNA and protein expression of STPG1 was positively modulated by ThPOK in gastric cancer cells. Moreover, the result of luciferase reporter assay and ChIP assay indicated that ThPOK bound with the promoter of STPG1. The function of STPG1 on gastric cancer cell behaviors was also explored. The CCK-8 assay showed the decreased gastric cancer cell viability after the transfection of STPG1 overexpression vectors. Moreover, STPG1 overexpression was also found to enhance T cell activation after coculture with gastric cancer cells. The role of STPG1 in cancer has been rarely investigated. A previous study has built a ten-gene signature including STPG1, and identified that this signature is correlated with the survival and immune infiltrating in uveal melanoma [30]. Our study further demonstrated the function of STPG1 on T cell activation after coculture with gastric cancer cells.

The ERK signaling pathway is critically involved in cancer progression. The proteins extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 (ERK1) and ERK2 are reported to control the cellular processes by widely phosphorylating diverse substrates, and their dysregulation leads to various diseases [31]. In the present study, we found that the protein levels of phosphorylated ERK-1/2 and the ratio of p-ERK-1/2/ERK-1/2 were both significantly decreased after ThPOK overexpression or STPG1 upregulation in gastric cancer cells, which indicated that ThPOK and STPG1 exerted inhibitory effects on the ERK signaling pathway. The ERK signaling pathway has also been reported to be implicated in multiple malignancies including prostate cancer [32], ovarian cancer [33], lung cancer [34]. For example, miR-302b inhibits conversion of the G1/S by negatively regulating CDK2 to inactivate the ERK signaling pathway in gastric cancer [35]. Since the aberrant activation of signal transducing proteins is closely associated with cancer progression, the exploration for the inhibitors of ERK pathway is of vital importance [36]. Our study has demonstrated that both ThPOK and STPG1 inactivated the ERK signaling in gastric cancer cells. ERKs are reported to be promising therapeutic targets for investigation of anticancer drugs.

Conclusions

In conclusion, ThPOK was downregulated in gastric cancer tissues and cells and its low expression predicted poor prognosis in gastric cancer patients. ThPOK inhibited gastric cancer cell viability and promoted T cell activation by transcriptionally inducing STPG1 to inactivate the ERK signaling. The findings in our study may provide new clues for the treatment of gastric cancer.

Availability of data and materials

All data from this study are available in this published article.

Abbreviations

STPG1:

Sperm tail PG-rich repeat containing 1

GC:

Gastric cancer

Zbtb7b:

Zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7B

References

  1. Smyth EC, Nilsson M, Grabsch HI, van Grieken NC, Lordick F. Gastric cancer. Lancet (London, England). 2020;396(10251):635–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schistosomes, liver flukes and Helicobacter pylori. IARC working group on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Lyon, 7–14 June 1994. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 1994;61:1–241.

  3. Plummer M, Franceschi S, Vignat J, Forman D, de Martel C. Global burden of gastric cancer attributable to Helicobacter pylori. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(2):487–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Personal habits and indoor combustions. Volume 100 E. A review of human carcinogens. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2012;100(1):1–538.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang Z, Yuan L, Yang L, Peng S, Yang P, He X, et al. Association study between KCNQ1 and KCNQ1OT1 genetic polymorphisms and gastric cancer susceptibility and survival in a Chinese Han population: a case-control study. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(2):156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen Y, Zhang K, Yu Z, Wu J, Qiu Z. Long intergenic non-coding RNA (lincRNA)-01317 suppresses human gastric cancer growth by inhibiting migration and invasion of cancer cells. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(2):770–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Arrieta VA, Cacho-Díaz B, Zhao J, Rabadan R, Chen L, Sonabend AM. The possibility of cancer immune editing in gliomas. A critical review. Oncoimmunology. 2018;7(7):e1445458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schreiber RD, Old LJ, Smyth MJ. Cancer immunoediting: integrating immunity’s roles in cancer suppression and promotion. Science (New York, NY). 2011;331(6024):1565–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Disis ML, Bernhard H, Jaffee EM. Use of tumour-responsive T cells as cancer treatment. Lancet (London, England). 2009;373(9664):673–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kelly KF, Daniel JM. POZ for effect–POZ-ZF transcription factors in cancer and development. Trends Cell Biol. 2006;16(11):578–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ciucci T, Vacchio MS, Gao Y, Tomassoni Ardori F, Candia J, Mehta M, et al. The emergence and functional fitness of memory CD4(+) T cells require the transcription factor thpok. Immunity. 2019;50(1):91-105.e4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mariani F, Sena P, Pedroni M, Benatti P, Manni P, Di Gregorio C, et al. Th inducing POZ-Kruppel Factor (ThPOK) is a key regulator of the immune response since the early steps of colorectal carcinogenesis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1):e54488.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee HO, He X, Mookerjee-Basu J, Zhongping D, Hua X, Nicolas E, et al. Disregulated expression of the transcription factor ThPOK during T-cell development leads to high incidence of T-cell lymphomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(25):7773–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roux PP, Blenis J. ERK and p38 MAPK-activated protein kinases: a family of protein kinases with diverse biological functions. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev MMBR. 2004;68(2):320–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Buscà R, Pouysségur J, Lenormand P. ERK1 and ERK2 map kinases: Specific roles or functional redundancy? Front Cell Dev Biol. 2016;4:53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu Y, Fu X, Ran Q, Yang K, Wen Y, Li H, et al. Globularifolin exerts anticancer effects on glioma U87 cells through inhibition of Akt/mTOR and MEK/ERK signaling pathways in vitro and inhibits tumor growth in vivo. Biochimie. 2017;142:144–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pereira SS, Máximo V, Coelho R, Batista R, Soares P, Guerreiro SG, et al. Telomerase and N-cadherin differential importance in adrenocortical cancers and adenomas. J Cell Biochem. 2017;118(8):2064–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kopecka J, Porto S, Lusa S, Gazzano E, Salzano G, Pinzòn-Daza ML, et al. Zoledronic acid-encapsulating self-assembling nanoparticles and doxorubicin: a combinatorial approach to overcome simultaneously chemoresistance and immunoresistance in breast tumors. Oncotarget. 2016;7(15):20753–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ho V, Lim TS, Lee J, Steinberg J, Szmyd R, Tham M, et al. TLR3 agonist and Sorafenib combinatorial therapy promotes immune activation and controls hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Oncotarget. 2015;6(29):27252–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu Z, Zhao Y, Fang J, Cui R, Xiao Y, Xu Q. SHP2 negatively regulates HLA-ABC and PD-L1 expression via STAT1 phosphorylation in prostate cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8(32):53518–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zdanov S, Mandapathil M, Abu Eid R, Adamson-Fadeyi S, Wilson W, Qian J, et al. Mutant KRAS conversion of conventional T cells into regulatory T cells. Cancer Immunol Res. 2016;4(4):354–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen N, Fang W, Lin Z, Peng P, Wang J, Zhan J, et al. KRAS mutation-induced upregulation of PD-L1 mediates immune escape in human lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother CII. 2017;66(9):1175–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Xing YN, Zhang JY, Xu HM. The roles of serum CXCL16 in circulating Tregs and gastrointestinal stromal tumor cells. OncoTargets Ther. 2016;9:3939–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nagy Á, Munkácsy G, Győrffy B. Pancancer survival analysis of cancer hallmark genes. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6047.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Li P, Ge D, Li P, Hu F, Chu J, Chen X, et al. CXXC finger protein 4 inhibits the CDK18-ERK1/2 axis to suppress the immune escape of gastric cancer cells with involvement of ELK1/MIR100HG pathway. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(17):10151–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hsu JM, Xia W, Hsu YH, Chan LC, Yu WH, Cha JH, et al. STT3-dependent PD-L1 accumulation on cancer stem cells promotes immune evasion. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jiao S, Xia W, Yamaguchi H, Wei Y, Chen MK, Hsu JM, et al. PARP inhibitor upregulates PD-L1 expression and enhances cancer-associated immunosuppression. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2017;23(14):3711–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wei M, Shen D, Mulmi Shrestha S, Liu J, Zhang J, Yin Y. The progress of T cell immunity related to prognosis in gastric cancer. BioMed Res Int. 2018;2018:3201940.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Luo H, Ma C, Shao J, Cao J. Prognostic implications of novel ten-gene signature in uveal melanoma. Front Oncol. 2020;10:567512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lavoie H, Gagnon J, Therrien M. ERK signalling: a master regulator of cell behaviour, life and fate. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(10):607–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Dasgupta P, Kulkarni P, Bhat NS, Majid S, Shiina M, Shahryari V, et al. Activation of the Erk/MAPK signaling pathway is a driver for cadmium induced prostate cancer. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2020;401:115102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tong X, Mu P, Zhang Y, Zhao J, Wang X. TRIM59, amplified in ovarian cancer, promotes tumorigenesis through the MKP3/ERK pathway. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235(11):8236–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang B, Zhu XX, Pan LY, Chen HF, Shen XY. PP4C facilitates lung cancer proliferation and inhibits apoptosis via activating MAPK/ERK pathway. Pathol Res Pract. 2020;216(5):152910.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu FY, Wang LP, Wang Q, Han P, Zhuang WP, Li MJ, et al. miR-302b regulates cell cycles by targeting CDK2 via ERK signaling pathway in gastric cancer. Cancer Med. 2016;5(9):2302–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kohno M, Pouyssegur J. Targeting the ERK signaling pathway in cancer therapy. Ann Med. 2006;38(3):200–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The work was supported by Medical Research Project of Wuhan Municipal Health Commission (Grant No. WX20C29).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ying Chen and Lingli Xia have contributed equally to the work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Hospital of Wuhan, Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University, 168 Hongkong Road, Jiang’an District, Wuhan, 430015, Hubei, China

    Ying Chen, Lili Jiang, Lingli Xia, Gang Zhang & Lan Chen

Authors
  1. Ying Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lili Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lingli Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YC, LLJ, and LC conceived and designed research; YC, LLJ, LLX, and GZ performed the research; LC analyzed the data; Ying Chen and Lili Jiang draft the paper. All authors read and approved final version of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lan Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of The Sixth Hospital of Wuhan, Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University (Hubei, China).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. Target genes of transcriptional factor ThPOK.

Additional file 2

. Original western blot images.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Jiang, L., Xia, L. et al. ThPOK inhibits the immune escape of gastric cancer cells by inducing STPG1 to inactivate the ERK pathway. BMC Immunol 23, 16 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12865-022-00485-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12865-022-00485-5

Keywords

BMC Immunology

ISSN: 1471-2172

Contact us