Skip to main content

A survey of the adaptive immune genes of the polka-dot batfish Ogcocephalus cubifrons

Abstract

Background

The anglerfish, belonging to the teleost order Lophiiformes, are a diverse and species-rich group of fish that are known to exhibit a number of unique morphological, reproductive and immunological adaptations. Work to date has identified the loss of specific adaptive immune components in two of the five Lophiiformes sub-orders (Lophioidei and Ceratioidei), while no anomalies have been identified to date in two other sub-orders, Antennaroidei and Chaunacoidei. The immunogenome of the fifth sub-order, Ogcocephaloidei has not yet been investigated, and we have therefore used whole genome shotgun sequencing, combined with RNA-seq, to survey the adaptive immune capabilities of the polka-dot batfish, O. cubifrons, as a representative of this as yet unexplored sub-order.

Results

We find that the O. cubifrons genome encodes the core genes needed to mount adaptive T and B cell responses. These genes include those necessary for rearranging and editing antigen receptors, the antigen receptors themselves; as well as the co-receptors, signalling molecules, and antigen presenting molecules (both class I and class II) needed for B cell and T cell development and activation.

Conclusions

From an immune perspective, the polka-dot batfish has a canonical complement of adaptive immune genes, and does not exhibit any of the adaptive immune changes previously identified in monkfish and oceanic anglerfish.

Peer Review reports

Background

The anglerfish, so named due to their use of an esca (lure) to attract prey, are a large grouping of fish belonging to the teleost order Lophiiformes, a morphologically diverse and species-rich order that exhibits many fascinating biological characteristics. One of these characteristics is the make-up of the adaptive immune system, which for several anglerfish species has been shown to differ significantly from the canonical form present in most other jawed vertebrates.

The Lophiiformes are currently divided into five suborders: Lophioidei (monkfish and goosefish), Antennaroidei (frogfish), Ogcocephaloidei (batfish), Chaunacoidei (sea toads) and Ceratiodei (deep-sea anglers) [1, 2]. Remarkably, genome analysis has revealed that species within the sub-orders Lophioidei [3] and Ceratiodei [4] exhibit substantial modifications to their adaptive immune capabilities. In the case of the Lophioidei, analysis of Lophius piscatorius has revealed that this species lacks the MHC2 antigen presentation pathway; the MHC2 alpha and beta genes themselves, as well as the genes encoding CD74 (required for peptide loading and trafficking of MHC2 complexes), and the MHC2 co-receptor CD4 have all been lost [3] (see Supplementary Fig. 1 for an overview of adaptive immune gene losses).

Deep-sea anglerfish utilise a peculiar method of reproduction referred to as sexual parasitism, in which pair formation for reproduction is mediated by physical attachments, with a male anglerfish attaching to a female partner using his mouth, a trait which is thought to be common to all members of the ceratioid suborder. Within the ceratioids there is a range of pairing behaviours, from temporary attachment (where transient interactions between males and females occur during breeding), permanent exclusive attachment (species in which a female permanently pairs with a single male via tissue fusion), to permanent multi-attachment (species in which a female permanently pairs with multiple males via tissue fusion) [2]. This continuum correlates with the loss of adaptive immune genes, ranging from relatively modest changes, such as the loss of aicda (activation-induced cytidine deaminase) in species that form temporary attachments, through to the most extreme change, the loss of RAG-mediated antigen receptor assembly in some species that form permanent multiple attachments [4].

The loss of immune genes in the Lophioidei and Ceratioidei sub-orders poses a conundrum: while within the ceratioid sub-order the loss of immune genes correlates with mating behaviour, the lophioids do not form physical pair bonds, so in this instance the loss of the MHC2-pathway cannot be readily attributed to reproductive mode. This observation may indicate that the drivers leading to loss of adaptive immune system components differ in these two instances, and raises the question of how widespread the loss of adaptive immune genes is within the Lophiiformes order. To date the immunogenomes of representative members of the Lophioidei, Antennaroidei, Chaunacoidei and Ceratioidei have been examined, however to our knowledge the adaptive immune facilities of the Ogcocephaloidei have not yet been explored. An overview of the immune genes present in this sub-order is therefore desirable to understand the scope and extent of the adaptive immune changes occurring within the Lophiiformes.

Over time many approaches have been used to determine the evolutionary relationships among the Lophiiformes sub-orders, including morphological/anatomical characteristics [1, 5, 6], mitochondrial genes [7], mitochondrial genomes [8], combinations of both nuclear and mitochondrial genes [9, 10], purely nuclear genes [11], molecular characteristics [12], and most recently ultraconserved genomic elements [13]. These approaches have yielded a variety of potential subordinal relationships (reviewed in [13]), however almost all of the proposed phylogenies indicate that the Lophioidei and Ceratioidei, the two sub-orders with known losses of adaptive immune genes, are relatively distantly related. The position of the Ogcocepahloidei within the Lophiiformes is somewhat unsettled, as while molecular phylogenies indicate that this sub-order is most closely related to the Antennarioidei [9,10,11, 13], phylogenies based on morphological characteristics propose a close relationship to the Ceratioidei [5, 6]. Given this uncertainty we resolved to investigate the immunogenome of a representative of the Ogcocephaloidei, to determine if members of this sub-order exhibit any overt modifications to their adaptive immune gene complement. Reports from experienced aquarists have indicated that batfish commonly suffer from high parasitic loads, and that aggressive use of anti-parasitic medication is often required in order to successfully adapt wild-caught individuals to captivity [14], further prompting interest in understanding the immunocompetence of this suborder.

We report here the survey of the adaptive immune genes present in the polka-dot batfish, Ocgocephalus cubifrons, and conclude that this species retains the core adaptive immune genes expected in a canonical jawed-vertebrate immune system, including the essential genes for mounting MHC1- and MHC2-mediated T cell responses, as well as B cell-mediated antibody responses.

Results

Essential genes enabling somatic modification of antigen receptors are present

The generation of T cell and B cell repertoires is dependent on the rag1 and rag2 genes, which are essential for the somatic rearrangement of B and T cell receptors via VDJ recombination. These genes have been lost in some ceratioids, and we therefore began our survey by testing for the presence of rag genes in the genome of O. cubifrons. Genomic DNA sequencing revealed the presence of both rag1 and rag2 genes in the typical tail to tail orientation (Fig. 1A), and expression of both genes could be detected by RNA-seq on thymus tissue (Table 1). In addition, we also detected expression of a terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase (dntt) orthologue in O. cubifrons thymus (Table 1). Phylogenetic analysis (Supplementary Fig. 2) substantiated the identity of the proposed dntt orthologue, distinguishing it from the closely related polymerase µ [15]; the expression of dntt transcripts in the thymus of O. cubifrons therefore indicates that insertion of non-templated nucleotides likely contributes to junctional diversity during RAG-mediated VDJ-recombination in this species.

Table 1 O. cubifrons orthologues identified in this study. Adaptive immunity-related genes are listed, together with the GenBank accession number for the O. cubifrons cDNA sequences assembled from RNA-seq data
Fig. 1
figure 1

Genomic configuration of the rag and aicda loci. The configuration of the rag1-rag2 (A) and the aicda (B) loci from O. cubifrons is depicted, relative to the corresponding loci in T. rubripes. In O. cubifrons the rag1 and rag2 genes are found in a tail-to-tail configuration, with the rag1 gene comprised of three coding exons (shown in red), while the rag2 gene has a single coding exon (dark blue). The O. cubifrons aicda gene is comprised of five coding exons (B, green), and is flanked by nat14 (orange) and necap1 (light blue) genes, as is the case in T. rubripes. The depicted scale bar applies to both (A) and (B). Only coding exons are indicated. Sequences for the O. cubifrons rag- and aicda- loci are available under the GenBank accession numbers OP856783 and OP856782 respectively

Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID, encoded by the aicda gene), is required for the process of somatic hypermutation during affinity maturation of antibody responses, and is absent in all of the Ceratioid genomes examined to date. In O. cubifrons however, we were able to identify an intact aicda gene, with local syntenic conservation of flanking genes (Fig. 1B). Low-level aicda expression was also detected in RNA-seq libraries (Table 1). Some fish species, such as the Atlantic cod, have intact aicda genes which nevertheless encode AID proteins with little to no catalytic activity [16]. As our sequencing data lacked sufficient coverage to conclusively demonstrate SHM in immunoglobulin sequences, we instead assessed catalytic potential by aligning key regions of the O. cubifrons AID protein with a representative set of high (human, zebrafish and pufferfish) and low (atlantic cod) activity AID orthologs. We found that O. cubifrons AID exhibits active residues at two key functional sites (Supplementary Fig. 3) indicating that this protein is likely catalytically active.

These observations demonstrate that the O. cubifrons genome encodes the core set of somatic DNA modifying genes necessary to generate adaptive T and B cell repertoires.

Core BCR signalling components are present

Antigen recognition via the B cell receptor (BCR) is an essential step in the generation of an adaptive, antibody-based humoral response. The core BCR signalling complex is composed of the BCR itself, and two accessory signalling components CD79a and CD79b, and we therefore determined the status of these genes in O. cubifrons. Screening of the O. cubifrons transcriptome revealed expression of both ighm and ighd immunoglobulin heavy chain genes, as well as cd79a and cd79b transcripts (Fig. 2A; Table 1). The signalling capacity of the BCR complex is dependent on the presence of immuno-receptor tyrosine-associated activation motifs (ITAMs) present in the intracellular tails of both CD79a and CD79b, and examination of the inferred protein sequence of O. cubifrons CD79a and CD79b revealed consensus ITAMs present in the C-terminus of both molecules (Fig. 2B C respectively). The expression of syk, a gene encoding a kinase which phosphorylates and interacts with the ITAMs present in CD79a and CD79b during BCR-signalling [17], could also be detected in O. cubifrons (Table 1). These results indicate that the core BCR signalling genes are present and expressed in O. cubifrons, and together with the presence of the rag and aicda genes, suggest that these fish have the requisite components to mount adaptive, antibody-mediated immune responses.

Fig. 2
figure 2

BCR signalling complex components. A schematic of the B cell receptor signalling complex is shown in (A). The intra-cellular tail of CD79a and CD79b signalling molecules are shown in (B) and (C), aligned to the orthologous sequences from T. rubripes. The location of ITAMs within the intra-cellular tails is indicated, the ruler below the alignments indicates the amino-acid position within the aligned full-length proteins

Core TCR signalling complex genes

The TCR signalling complex is essential for T cell development and antigen-specific cellular responses, and is composed of both antigen recognition components, the heterodimeric a and b TCR chains, and signalling components in the form of CD3 molecules. Expression of both trac and trbc genes could be readily detected in the O. cubifrons thymus (Fig. 3A; Table 1), together with transcripts for cd3e, cd3gd and cd3z. We then examined the intracellular tail of the predicted CD3 proteins for the presence of the ITAMs that are central to TCR-driven signalling, and found that CD3gd and CD3z had the expected number of ITAMs (one and three respectively, Fig. 3B C), all of which conformed to the consensus motif. The putative ITAM in the CD3e sequence however was only a partial match, with a proline, rather than the expected isoleucine, leucine or valine, in the first half of the motif (YxxP, instead of YxxI/L/V; see Fig. 3D). At present, the functional consequence of this modification is unknown, however a proline at position 4 of the CD3e ITAM has been noted in several other anglerfish species [4]. Notably, a PxxPxxDY motif responsible for interactions with Nck [18], and having an important role in TCR-signalling [19] was conserved in the O. cubifrons CD3e intracellular tail (Fig. 3D), suggesting that this chain retains at least some signalling capacity. Expression of lck, a gene encoding the central kinase involved in ITAM-phosphorylation during TCR-signalling [20], was also detected (Table 1). Overall, these results indicate the presence of a functional TCR-signalling complex in O. cubifrons, however variation in the CD3e intracellular tail may alter the overally activity of the complex.

Fig. 3
figure 3

TCR signalling complex components. A schematic of the T cell receptor signalling complex is shown in (A). The intra-cellular tail of the CD3gd, CD3z and CD3e signalling chains are shown in (B), (C) and (D) respectively, and are aligned to the orthologous sequences from T. rubripes. The location of ITAMs within the intra-cellular tails is indicated, the ruler below the alignments indicates the amino-acid position within the aligned full-length proteins. The presence of a non-consensus amino acid in the first half of the CD3e ITAM is indicated by an open square in the motif marker

Class I MHC pathway

The MHC1 antigen presentation pathway presents endogenous peptides to T cells via a heterodimer comprised of an MHC heavy chain bound with the accessory protein b2-microglobulin (b2M)[21, 22] (Fig. 4A). BLAST searches of the O. cubifrons thymus transcriptome indicated expression of polymorphic mhc1 genes, and PCR primers were designed to conserved regions of the putative mhc1 transcripts to assess sequence diversity. Complete MHC1 heavy chain encoding sequences were amplified from thymus tissue of a single individual, cloned into plasmids, and 10 clones were selected at random for Sanger sequencing. Analysis of these 10 clones revealed 8 distinct sequences; however, it has been noted that MHC haplotyping via PCR can artificially inflate allelic diversity [23], and a more stringent assessment based on distinct polymorphic positions is congruent with the presence of at least 3 distinct alleles in the sequenced individual (Supplementary Fig. 4). In addition to expression of polymorphic mhc1 heavy chain transcripts, interrogation of the O. cubifrons transcriptome revealed the expression of two distinct beta-2-microglobulin (b2m) genes (Table 1), in keeping with detection of multiple b2m genes in many fish species [24,25,26]. Peptide transporters play a critical role in the MHC1-antigen presentation pathway [27,28,29], and expression of tap1 and tap2 genes could also be detected in thymus tissue by RNA-seq (Table 1). Together, these results demonstrate that O. cubifrons expresses the core set of genes required for generating peptide-loaded, polymorphic MHC1 complexes.

Fig. 4
figure 4

MHC1 pathway components. A schematic of a TCR-MHC1-CD8 complex is shown in (A). The intra-cellular tails of the CD8a and CD8b co-receptor chains are shown in (B) and (C), aligned to the orthologous sequences from T. rubripes. The locations of conserved CxH motifs, thought to be necessary for interaction with Lck, are indicated

T cell recognition of peptide/MHC1-complexes is enhanced via the binding of the CD8 co-receptor, which functions as either a CD8ab heterodimer, or as a CD8aa homodimer. Expression of O. cubifrons cd8a and cd8b orthologues were readily detected in the O. cubifrons transcriptome (Table 1). The co-receptor function of CD8 is dependent on the ability to interact with Lck, which in teleosts is thought to occur via a CxH motif present in the co-receptor, and a CxxC motif present in the kinase [30]. Examination of the inferred protein sequences of the O. cubifrons cd8a and cd8b cDNAs revealed the presence of a CxH motif within the intracellular tail of both molecules (Fig. 4B C), indicating that they have the potential to mediate signalling via Lck binding.

Collectively these results show that the basic molecules required for the presentation of MHC1/peptide-complexes to TCR/CD8-co-receptor expressing T cells are present in O. cubifrons.

Class II MHC pathway

The MHC2 antigen presentation pathway presents exogenous peptides to T cells via a heterodimer comprised of MHC2 a- and b-chains ([31] and Fig. 5A); components of this pathway have been lost in several species within the Lophiiformes order. We therefore performed BLAST searches to identify expression of representative mhc2a and mhc2b genes in O. cubifrons, and detected expression of both mhc2a and mhc2b orthologues in thymus transcriptome data (Table 1). Analysis of mhc2a transcripts revealed only minimal sequence diversity, however RNA-seq data indicated the presence of polymorphic mhc2b alleles. To characterise this diversity, we designed primers binding in conserved regions to amplify the entire coding sequence of an mhc2b target from a single individual, and cloned and sequenced the resulting amplicons. In this instance, analysis of 10 randomly selected clones demonstrated the presence of at least two distinct mhc2b alleles (Supplementary Fig. 5). Therefore, unlike the situation described in Lophius species, mhc2 genes are retained in O. cubifrons. Expression of cd74, another MHC2-pathway gene [32, 33] that is absent in Lophioidei, could also be readily detected in O. cubifrons RNA-seq data (Table 1).

Fig. 5
figure 5

MHC2 pathway components. A schematic of a TCR-MHC2-CD4 complex is shown in (A). The intra-cellular tails of the CD4.1 and CD4.2 co-receptor chains are shown in (B) and (C), aligned to the orthologous sequences from T. rubripes. The locations of conserved CxC Lck-interaction motifs (black squares) and arginine/lysine-rich regions (blue line) within the intra-cellular tails are indicated

Recognition of MHC2-peptide complexes by T cells is facilitated by a CD4 co-receptor expressed by helper and regulatory T cells [34]. Most teleost fish species have two CD4 genes, cd4.1 and cd4.2 [35], and we searched for evidence of these genes in O. cubifrons. Expression of both cd4.1 and cd4.2 orthologues could be readily detected in O. cubifrons RNA-seq data, and sequences of the complete coding regions of these orthologues was determined (Table 1). Examination of the inferred protein sequence of the intracellular tails of CD4.1 and CD4.2 revealed the presence of the expected CxC motif, which is required for interaction with Lck, in both instances (Fig. 5B C). A membrane-proximal arginine/lysine rich region, thought to facilitate interactions with Lck [36, 37], was also observed in the intracellular tails of CD4.1 and CD4.2 (Fig. 5B C). Analysis of the 5’ coding region of the O. cubifrons cd4.1 transcripts (encoding the CD4.1 N-terminus) however revealed an unexpectedly high degree of sequence variability, primarily within the second and third coding exons. This variation was observed in both specimens for which sequence data was available, and through the use of a combination of RNA-seq data, whole-genome shotgun sequences, and targeted Sanger sequencing we identified three cd4.1 variants (V1 – V3), based upon the sequence of the first three coding exons (Fig. 6). V1 was unique to the first specimen, V2 was shared by both, and V3 was unique to the second specimen. Alignment of these three variants revealed a total of 17 polymorphic sites within the first three coding exons; 16 SNPs and one 3 bp indel (Fig. 6A). Among the SNPs, 14/16 were at non-synonymous sites, and all polymorphic sites were found within a region predicted by InterProScan [38] to encode an immunoglobulin-like fold (Fig. 6B). All of the variants are expected to encode full-length proteins (no non-sense mutations were detected, and the 3 bp indel preserved the translational reading frame), however the functional consequence of the sequence variation within the N-terminal Ig-domain are unknown. Despite this uncertainty, the expression of genes involved in antigen presentation (mhc2a, mhc2b and cd74), together with the detection of cd4.1 and cd4.2 co-receptor genes, indicates that the MHC2-pathway is active in O. cubifrons.

Fig. 6
figure 6

CD4.1 sequence polymorphism in O. cubifrons. The sequence of the first three coding exons of three variant O. cubifrons cd4.1 alleles are shown in (A). Bars above the alignment indicate exon position, and shaded nucleotides indicate polymorphic sites. Black circles above the polymorphic positions indicate synonymous sites, red squares indicate non-synonymous sites. The protein sequences encoded by the first three exons of the variant cd4.1 alleles are shown in (B). Polymorphic amino acids are shaded, and a consensus sequence logo is shown underneath the alignment. The location of the signal peptide and Ig-like fold domain predicted by InterProScan is indicated above the alignment; shaded bars indicate the exons encoding the corresponding amino acids

Discussion

Our analysis of immune genes demonstrates that the batfish O. cubifrons possesses the core genes required to mount adaptive T and B cell responses. From an immunological perspective, compared to other members of the Lophiiformes, O. cubifrons therefore has a similar gene complement to representatives from Antennaroidei and Chaunacoidei, but differs from the Lophioidei and Ceratioidei. As mentioned above, within the Lophiiformes, the loss of adaptive immune genes correlates with reproductive mode, and with the exception of the Lophioidei, only species that utilise temporary or permanent attachment-based mating strategies have so far exhibited reductions in their adaptive immune gene complement. The spawning and courtship behaviour of O. cubifrons has been observed in captivity, and while males were observed to nip spawning females during courtship, no pair attachment was documented [39], and from this perspective, the full complement of core adaptive immune genes is consistent with their “non-attaching” phenotype.

One curious observation from the analysis of O. cubifrons adaptive immune genes is the high degree of polymorphism observed in the cd4.1 gene - interestingly, this variability was focused within the sequence encoding the N-terminal Ig-domain, which in mammals is known to be the domain that interacts directly with MHC2 [40, 41]. Variation in this domain has previously been noted in several primate species, where it is thought to provide protection against lentiviruses that use CD4 as a receptor to gain entry into the cell [42,43,44]. To date we have only had the opportunity to analyse cd4.1 sequences from two O. cubifrons individuals, so it is not yet possible to make firm conclusions regarding the level of cd4 diversity at the population level in this species. Nevertheless, the detection of three different alleles in two individuals, the clustering of the polymorphic sites in a single structural domain, and the high proportion of non-synonymous SNPs, is indicative of a selective process worthy of further investigation, especially in light of the complete loss of CD4 observed in some closely related species.

Within the Lophiiformes, complete loss of cd4 genes has been noted in L. piscatorius, as well as in four species in the Ceratioid sub-order (G. vanhoeffeni, C. couesii, H. mollis, and P. spiniceps), and fails to correlate solely with reproductive mode (with examples of loss in non-attachers, temporary attachers and permanent multi-attachers). Furthermore, loss of cd4 genes is not unique to members of the Lophiiformes, and was first reported in the Atlantic cod [45], as well as in several species of pipefish [46]. At present no single unifying feature appears sufficient to explain the absence of CD4 in these fish species, and this remains an important open question that requires clarification [47]. It is tempting to speculate that CD4 variability in O. cubifrons may be evidence for an active selective process driving CD4 evolution in this species. However, testing this proposal will require sequence data from a greater number of individuals, ideally paired with data from other closely related batfish species.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first survey of a batfish immunogenome, and the results demonstrate that this fish species has the canonical complement of adaptive immune genes. The Ogcocephaloidei sub-order is complex, containing at least 9 genera and over 60 species [48, 49], and a limitation of our study is that we have so far only been able to analyse a single representative species of the sub-order; further sampling is therefore needed to determine if the immunogenome of O. cubifrons is representative for the entire sub-order, or if other immune configurations are present. Despite this limitation, the data presented here give the first insight into adaptive immunity in this sub-order, and the sequence data generated in this study will be a useful resource for research in both immunological and non-immunology-related fields.

Methods

Specimens and sequencing

Two Ogcocephalus cubifrons specimens, designated Ocub1 (male) and Ocub2 (unknown sex), were obtained from an ornamental fish supplier, and euthanised by immersion in a 3 L bath containing a lethal dose of MS-222 (Tricaine, 100 mg/L, diluted in artificial seawater), in accordance with local animal welfare regulations. Thymus and testes were harvested immediately for RNA- and genomic DNA-extraction respectively. RNA was extracted from thymus tissue using the TRI Reagent (Merck/Sigma-Aldrich) method, as per the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA-sequencing libraries were prepared using the Illumina TruSeq Stranded mRNA Library Prep Kit, and then sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (Ocub1) or NextSeq 500 (Ocub2) sequencer. Genomic DNA was isolated from testis tissue by digestion with proteinase K, and subsequent phenol-chloroform extraction. Genomic sequencing libraries were prepared using the Illumina TruSeq PCR-Free Library Prep Kit, and sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 sequencer. RNA was sequenced from both Ocub1 and Ocub2 thymi; genomic sequencing was performed on Ocub1 only. All sequencing data has been deposited into the NCBI sequence read archive (SRA) and can be accessed under the BioProject ID PRJNA905091. To validate the species identity of the sequenced individuals, a complete Cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene sequence was assembled from both Ocub1 and Ocub2 sequence data, and used to search the BOLD Identification System species level barcode records [50]. The top three hits in both instances were to previously existing O. cubifrons barcodes, which exhibited 100–99.85% identity to the search sequences. To estimate genomic coverage we performed SPAdes[51] de novo assembly, followed by BUSCO[52] (version 5.4.2) assessment, which yielded the following output: C:47.5%[S:46.0%,D:1.5%],F:14.5%,M:38.0%,n:3640 (where C = complete, S = complete and single-copy, D = complete and duplicated, F = fragmented, M = missing and n = total BUSCO groups searched; the actinopterygii_odb10 lineage dataset was used). A similar approach was used to estimate transciptome coverage. Transcriptomes were assembled de novo using Trinity [53] (version 2.8.5), and the pooled thymus transciptome (Ocub1 and Ocub2) was subjected to BUSCO assessment, which yielded the following output: C:85.5%[S:25.0%,D:60.5%],F:2.9%,M:11.6%,n:3640. The de novo assemblies are available from the authors upon request.

In some instances, specific targets were validated by Sanger sequencing; in these cases, target amplicons were amplified using Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs) and the primers listed in Table 2. Amplicons were subsequently cloned into pJET1.2 using the CloneJET PCR Cloning Kit (ThermoFischer Scientific), and clones of interest were sequenced using the ABI PRISM BigDye Terminator v3.1 Ready Reaction Cycle Sequencing Kit, and reactions were analysed on an Applied Biosystems 3730xl DNA Analyzer.

Table 2 PCR primers used in this study

Sequence analysis and identification of orthologues

Comparisons were made primarily with sequences derived from T. rubripes, as this species belongs to the Tetraodontiformes, an order closely related to the Lophiiformes [54], and are known to possess the adaptive immune genes examined in this study [55,56,57,58,59,60]. T. rubripes protein sequences were used to search O. cubifrons transcriptome and genome databases, using a SequenceServer 2.0.0 [61] custom BLAST server, and hits were then assembled using DNASTAR SeqMan Ultra software. The resulting O. cubifrons transcripts, and their inferred protein sequences, were then BLASTed against both T. rubpripes- and teleost-specific databases (NCBI taxids 31,033 and 32,443 respectively) to confirm the identity of the candidate orthologue [62, 63]. DNA and protein alignments were performed with DNASTAR MegAlign Pro software (version 17.2.1), using the MUSCLE [64] or ClustalW [65] algorithms. Transmembrane regions in proteins were predicted with TMHMM 2.0 [66], and signal peptides and domain predictions were made using InterProScan [38]. Phylogenetic trees were constructed in MegAlign Pro using the RAxML method [67].

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) repository under the BioProject ID PRJNA905091. Assembled sequences generated in this study are available in the NCBI GenBank repository, or from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Pietsch TW, Arnold RJ. Frogfishes: biodiversity, zoogeography, and behavioral ecology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2020.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Pietsch TW. Oceanic Anglerfishes. Univ of California Press; 2009.

  3. Dubin A, Jørgensen TE, Moum T, Johansen SD, Jakt LM. Complete loss of the MHC II pathway in an anglerfish, Lophius piscatorius. Biol Lett. 2019;15:20190594.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Swann JB, Holland SJ, Petersen M, Pietsch TW, Boehm T. The immunogenetics of sexual parasitism. Science. 2020;369:1608–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pietsch TW, Grobecker DB. Frogfishes of the World: Systematics, Zoogeography, and behavioral Ecology. Stanford University Press; 1987.

  6. Datovo A, de Pinna MCC, Johnson GD. The Infrabranchial musculature and its bearing on the phylogeny of Percomorph Fishes (Osteichthyes: Teleostei). PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e110129.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Shedlock AM, Pietsch TW, Haygood MG, Bentzen P, Hasegawa M. Molecular systematics and life history evolution of anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes): evidence from mitochondrial DNA. Steenstrupia. 2004;2:129–44.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Miya M, Pietsch TW, Orr JW, Arnold RJ, Satoh TP, Shedlock AM, et al. Evolutionary history of anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes): a mitogenomic perspective. BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10:58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Broughton Betancur-RR, Wiley RE, Carpenter EO, López K, Li JA et al. C,. The Tree of Life and a New Classification of Bony Fishes. Plos Curr. 2013;5:ecurrents.tol.53ba26640df0ccaee75bb165c8c26288.

  10. Derouen V, Ludt WB, Ho H-C, Chakrabarty P. Examining evolutionary relationships and shifts in depth preferences in batfishes (Lophiiformes: Ogcocephalidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015;84:27–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Near TJ, Dornburg A, Eytan RI, Keck BP, Smith WL, Kuhn KL, et al. Phylogeny and tempo of diversification in the superradiation of spiny-rayed fishes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:12738–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Betancur -RR, Wiley EO, Arratia G, Acero A, Bailly N, Miya M, et al. Phylogenetic classification of bony fishes. BMC Evol Biol. 2017;17:162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hart PB, Arnold RJ, Alda F, Kenaley CP, Pietsch TW, Hutchinson D et al. Evolutionary Relationships of Anglerfishes (Lophiiformes) reconstructed using Ultraconserved elements. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2022;:107459.

  14. Christie BL, Montoya PZ, Torres LA, IV JWF. The natural history and husbandry of the walking batfishes (Lophiiformes: Ogcocephalidae). Drum and Croaker. 2016;47.

  15. Beetz S, Diekhoff D, Steiner LA. Characterization of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase and polymerase µ in zebrafish. Immunogenetics. 2007;59:735–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghorbani A, Khataeipour SJ, Solbakken MH, Huebert DNG, Khoddami M, Eslamloo K, et al. Ancestral reconstruction reveals catalytic inactivation of activation-induced cytidine deaminase concomitant with cold water adaption in the Gadiformes bony fish. BMC Biol. 2022;20:293.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Rolli V, Gallwitz M, Wossning T, Flemming A, Schamel WWA, Zürn C, et al. Amplification of B Cell Antigen receptor signaling by a Syk/ITAM positive feedback Loop. Mol Cell. 2002;10:1057–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gil D, Schamel WWA, Montoya M, Sánchez-Madrid F, Alarcón B. Recruitment of Nck by CD3ϵ reveals a Ligand-Induced Conformational Change essential for T cell receptor signaling and synapse formation. Cell. 2002;109:901–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Borroto A, Arellano I, Blanco R, Fuentes M, Orfao A, Dopfer EP, et al. Relevance of Nck–CD3ε Interaction for T Cell activation in vivo. J Immunol. 2014;192:2042–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Love PE, Hayes SM. ITAM-mediated signaling by the T-Cell Antigen receptor. Csh Perspect Biol. 2010;2:a002485.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grey HM, Kubo RT, Colon SM, Poulik MD, Cresswell P, Springer T, et al. The small subunit of HL-A antigens is ß2-microglobulin. J Exp Medicine. 1973;138:1608–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bjorkman PJ, Saper MA, Samraoui B, Bennett WS, Strominger JL, Wiley DC. Structure of the human class I histocompatibility antigen, HLA-A2. Nature. 1987;329:506–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. BABIK W. Methods for MHC genotyping in non-model vertebrates. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010;10:237–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shum BP, Azumi K, Zhang S, Kehrer SR, Raison RL, Detrich HW, et al. Unexpected beta2-microglobulin sequence diversity in individual rainbow trout. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1996;93:2779–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kondo H, Darawiroj D, Gung Y-T-A, Yasuike M, Hirono I, Aoki T. Identification of two distinct types of beta-2 microglobulin in marine fish, Pagrus major and Seriola quinqueradiata. Vet Immunol Immunop. 2010;134:284–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Grimholt U. Whole genome duplications have provided teleosts with many roads to peptide loaded MHC class I molecules. Bmc Evol Biol. 2018;18:25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bahram S, Arnold D, Bresnahan M, Strominger JL, Spies T. Two putative subunits of a peptide pump encoded in the human major histocompatibility complex class II region. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1991;88:10094–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Spies T, DeMars R. Restored expression of major histocompatibility class I molecules by gene transfer of a putative peptide transporter. Nature. 1991;351:323–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Powis SJ, Townsend ARM, Deverson EV, Bastin J, Butcher GW, Howard JC. Restoration of antigen presentation to the mutant cell line RMA-S by an MHC-linked transporter. Nature. 1991;354:528–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hayashi N, Takeuchi M, Nakanishi T, Hashimoto K, Dijkstra JM. Zinc-dependent binding between peptides derived from rainbow trout CD8α and LCK. Fish Shellfish Immun. 2010;28:72–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Brown JH, Jardetzky TS, Gorga JC, Stern LJ, Urban RG, Strominger JL, et al. Three-dimensional structure of the human class II histocompatibility antigen HLA-DR1. Nature. 1993;364:33–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jones PP, Murphy DB, Hewgill D, McDevitt HO. Detection of a common polypeptide chain in I-A and I-E sub-region immunoprecipitates. Mol Immunol. 1979;16:51–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Roche PA, Marks MS, Cresswell PJ. Formation of a nine-subunit complex by HLA class II glycoproteins and the invariant chain. Nature. 1991;354:392–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Littman DR, editor. The CD4 molecule. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dijkstra JM, Somamoto T, Moore L, Hordvik I, Ototake M, Fischer U. Identification and characterization of a second CD4-like gene in teleost fish. Mol Immunol. 2006;43:410–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Huse M, Eck MJ, Harrison SC. A Zn2 + Ion Links the cytoplasmic tail of CD4 and the N-terminal region of Lck*. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:18729–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Laing KJ, Zou JJ, Purcell MK, Phillips R, Secombes CJ, Hansen JD. Evolution of the CD4 family: teleost fish possess two divergent forms of CD4 in addition to lymphocyte activation gene-3. J Immunol. 2006;177:3939–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Blum M, Chang H-Y, Chuguransky S, Grego T, Kandasaamy S, Mitchell A, et al. The InterPro protein families and domains database: 20 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;49:gkaa977.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Christie BL, Torres LA, IV JWF. First estimate of the fecundity of Ogcocephalus cubifrons (Lophiiformes) with notes on spawning behaviour. Cybium. 2020;44:69–71.

  40. Wang J, Meijers R, Xiong Y, Liu J, Sakihama T, Zhang R, et al. Crystal structure of the human CD4 N-terminal two-domain fragment complexed to a class II MHC molecule. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001;98:10799–804.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Yin Y, Wang XX, Mariuzza RA. Crystal structure of a complete ternary complex of T-cell receptor, peptide–MHC, and CD4. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:5405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Russell RM, Bibollet-Ruche F, Liu W, Sherrill-Mix S, Li Y, Connell J, et al. CD4 receptor diversity represents an ancient protection mechanism against primate lentiviruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2021;118:e2025914118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Bibollet-Ruche F, Russell RM, Liu W, Stewart-Jones GBE, Sherrill-Mix S, Li Y, et al. CD4 receptor diversity in chimpanzees protects against SIV infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019;116:3229–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang ZD, Weinstock G, Gerstein M. Rapid Evolution by positive darwinian selection in T-Cell Antigen CD4 in Primates. J Mol Evol. 2008;66:446–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Star B, Nederbragt AJ, Jentoft S, Grimholt U, Malmstrøm M, Gregers TF, et al. The genome sequence of Atlantic cod reveals a unique immune system. Nature. 2011;477:207–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Roth O, Solbakken MH, Tørresen OK, Bayer T, Matschiner M, Baalsrud HT, et al. Evolution of male pregnancy associated with remodeling of canonical vertebrate immunity in seahorses and pipefishes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;25:201916251.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Star B, Jentoft S. Why does the immune system of Atlantic cod lack MHC II? BioEssays. 2012;34:648–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Bradbury MG. The Genera of Batfishes (Family Ogcocephalidae). Copeia. 1967;1967:399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ho H-C. Taxonomy and distribution of the Deep-Sea Batfish Genus Halieutopsis (Teleostei: Ogcocephalidae), with descriptions of five New Species. J Mar Sci Eng. 2021;10:34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN. bold: The Barcode of Life Data System (http://www.barcodinglife.org). Mol Ecol Notes. 2007;7:355–64.

  51. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. SPAdes: a New Genome Assembly Algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3210–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:644–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Chanet B, Guintard C, Betti E, Gallut C, Dettaï A, Lecointre G. Evidence for a close phylogenetic relationship between the teleost orders Tetraodontiformes and Lophiiformes based on an analysis of soft anatomy. Cybium. 2013;37:179–98.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Guselnikov SV, Najakshin AM, Taranin AV. Fugu rubripes possesses genes for the entire set of the ITAM-bearing transmembrane signal subunits. Immunogenetics. 2003;55:472–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Aparicio S, Chapman J, Stupka E, Putnam N, Chia J, Dehal P, et al. Whole-genome Shotgun Assembly and Analysis of the genome of Fugu rubripes. Science. 2002;297:1301–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Peixoto BR, Mikawa Y, Brenner S. Characterization of the recombinase activating gene-1 and 2 locus in the japanese pufferfish, Fugu rubripes. Gene. 2000;246:275–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Timón M, Elgar G, Habu S, Okumura K, Beverley PCL. Molecular cloning of major histocompatibility complex class I cDNAs from the pufferfish Fugu rubripes. Immunogenetics. 1997;47:170–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Saha NR, Suetake H, Kikuchi K, Suzuki Y. Fugu immunoglobulin D: a highly unusual gene with unprecedented duplications in its constant region. Immunogenetics. 2004;56:438–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Suetake H, Araki K, Akatsu K, Somamoto T, Dijkstra JM, Yoshiura Y, et al. Genomic organization and expression of CD8α and CD8β genes in fugu Takifugu rubripes. Fish Shellfish Immun. 2007;23:1107–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Priyam A, Woodcroft BJ, Rai V, Moghul I, Munagala A, Ter F, et al. Sequenceserver: a modern graphical user interface for Custom BLAST Databases. Mol Biol Evol. 2019;36:2922–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Sayers EW, Bolton EE, Brister JR, Canese K, Chan J, Comeau DC, et al. Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;50:D20–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:4673–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer ELL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001;305:567–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Felder, O. Thomas and M. Petersen for bioinformatics assistance; and the staff of the Deep Sequencing and Bioinformatics core facilities at the MPI-IE for sequencing advice, services and data handling.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This project was funded by the Max Planck Society.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JBS and TB designed the experiments; the experiments were performed by JBS, CG and MS; the data were analysed by JBS and TB. The manuscript was prepared by JBS and TB. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy B. Swann.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

This animal study was approved by the Animal Welfare Committee of the Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics. All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with German state and federal guidelines and regulations. The methods are reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines.

Consent for publication.

Not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy Swann (swann@ie-freiburg.mpg.de).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

12865_2023_557_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Additional File 1: Supplementary Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of putative O. cubifrons Dntt and Polymerase μ (Polm) orthologues.

12865_2023_557_MOESM2_ESM.pdf

Additional File 2: Supplementary Figure 3. Assessment of O. cubifrons AID regions predicted to modulate catalytic function.

Additional File 3: Supplementary Figure 4. MHC1 sequence diversity.

Additional File 4: Supplementary Figure 5. MHC2b sequence diversity.

Additional File 5: Supplementary Figure 1. Overview of adaptive immune system gene loss in anglerfish suborders.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Swann, J.B., Grammer, C., Schorpp, M. et al. A survey of the adaptive immune genes of the polka-dot batfish Ogcocephalus cubifrons. BMC Immunol 24, 20 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12865-023-00557-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12865-023-00557-0

Keywords