- Research article
- Open Access
Modulators of arginine metabolism support cancer immunosurveillance
© Capuano et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
- Received: 10 April 2008
- Accepted: 09 January 2009
- Published: 09 January 2009
Tumor-associated accrual of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) in the blood, lymphoid organs and tumor tissues may lead to perturbation of the arginine metabolism and impairment of the endogenous antitumor immunity. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether accumulation of MDSC occurred in Th2 prone BALB/c and Th1 biased C57BL/6 mice bearing the C26GM colon carcinoma and RMA T lymphoma, respectively, and to investigate whether N(G) nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) and sildenafil, both modulators of the arginine metabolism, restored antitumor immunity.
We report here that MDSC accumulate in the spleen and blood of mice irrespective of the mouse and tumor model used. Treatment of tumor-bearing mice with either the phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor sildenafil or the nitric-oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor L-NAME significantly restrained tumor growth and expanded the tumor-specific immune response.
Our data emphasize the role of MDSC in modulating the endogenous tumor-specific immune response and underline the anti-neoplastic therapeutic potential of arginine metabolism modulators.
- Myeloid Derive Suppressor Cell
- Delay Tumor Growth
- Arginine Metabolism
- Splenic CD11b
An established tumor adopts several strategies to escape immunosurveillance and this complex phenomenon results in generation of a site of acquired immune privilege . Over time, local suppression spreads systemically, thereby weakening immunological barriers that might protect against tumor metastasis. Tumor-specific suppression might explain why even immunotherapies that succeed in inducing systemic immune response are rarely of clinical effect on tumors.
As reviewed in , impairment in tumor antigen expression or its processing and presentation by both tumor cells and antigen presenting cells (APC), release of immunouppressive cytokines and prostaglandins as well as pro-apoptotic mechanisms may directly and/or indirectly impair T cell function while favoring tumor cell growth. Finally, tumor cells may promote development and recruitment of regulatory T cells (Treg) and myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC). CD4+CD25+ Treg in particular, represent an essential mechanism of peripheral tolerance to self antigens . They selectively express Foxp3, a forkhead/winged helix transcription factor that controls master genes in Treg development/function . Several neoplasms associate with CD4+CD25+ Treg accumulation in the blood and/or in tumors, and this may inversely correlate with patients' survival .
MDSC are a heterogeneous population of cells of myeloid origin , and include immature macrophages, granulocytes, dendritic cells (DC) and other myeloid cells [2, 5–7]. Whereas in the spleen of normal mice they account for less than 5% of the nucleated cells, they rapidly accumulate in secondary lymphoid organs, blood and tissues during inflammation and cancer [6, 8]. Several soluble factors contribute to alteration of the normal myelopoiesis and recruitment of MDSC to peripheral organs under pathologic conditions, including IL-3, IL-6, IL-10, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) [6–8]. In mice, MDSC are characteristically CD11b+Gr-1+, and may also express CD31 , CD124, IL-4 receptor α-chain  and CD80 . Expression of CD115 on MDSC may correlate with their ability to mediate development of Treg . In humans MDSC have been described to accumulate in the peripheral blood of patients affected by breast, lung, renal and head and neck carcinomas  and in melanoma , but their phenotype is still poorly defined. MDSC impair T lymphocyte functions through different mechanisms, including immunosuppressive cytokines and perturbation of the arginine metabolism by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), arginase (Arg), and reactive oxygen species . More in details, iNOS produces nitric oxide (NO), which interferes with IL-2 receptor signaling , leading to cell cycle arrest. NO is also a key signaling molecule in inflammation-driven diseases, including cancer, where it participates to cancerogenesis, angiogenesis, tumor cell proliferation and invasion . Furthermore, high Arg activity depletes arginine from the microenvironment, inhibiting T cell activation and proliferation , and favoring T cell apoptosis .
Several Arg and NOS inhibitors have been tested with the purpose to inhibit tumor development and favor antitumor immunity . As an example, N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine as been shown to restore anti-tumor immunity in vitro . Unfortunately, its use in clinic has been discontinued due to severe toxicity . N(G) nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) has been reported in several mouse models to inhibit tumor growth [20–22]. Those studies however, did not investigate a direct correlation of its effects on the endogenous tumor-specific immune response. More recently, Serafini et al.  reported that phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil) down regulate Arg and iNOS expression, thereby impairing the immunosuppressive activity of MDSC. In the mouse models tested, restoration of T cell immunity correlate with substantial delay in tumor progression .
We evaluated whether accumulation of MDSC occurred in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice bearing the C26GM colon carcinoma and RMA T lymphoma, respectively, and we investigated whether L-NAME and sildenafil restored antitumor immunity and delayed tumor growth.
MDSC accumulate in the spleen and blood of tumor-bearing mice
The immune response to pathogens and tumors is genetically controlled, and may diverge in different mouse strains. As an example, BALB/c mice are considered a Th2 prone strain, whereas Th1 responses dominate in C57BL/6 mice. Because Th2-associated cytokines (e.g. IL-6) and other soluble factors are needed to alter normal myelopoiesis and favor recruitment of MDSC to peripheral organs [6–8], and both Th1 (IFN-γ) and Th2 (IL-13) cytokines are required for activation of MDSC , a balance between Th1 and Th2 immune responses may be required for MDSC accumulation and immunosuppressive function during tumor progression. To investigate whether similar populations of MDSC accumulated also in a Th1-prone strain upon tumor challenge, C57BL/6 mice were implanted s.c. with RMA cells, a Rauscher virus-induced T lymphoma . Because RMA is less aggressive than C26GM, mice were killed 2 weeks after tumor challenge, time at which the mass had reached a dimension of approximately 400 mm3. Tumor-associated accumulation of CD11b+Gr1+ cells in the blood of C57BL/6 mice was comparable to the one found in tumor-bearing BALB/c mice (Fig. 1D, H and 1L and 1B, F and 1J, respectively). A less dramatic but still statistical significant accumulation of CD11b+Gr1+ cells was evident also in the spleen of mice bearing RMA lymphomas (Fig. 1C, G and 1K). Accumulation of CD11b+Gr1- cells was less conspicuous in C57BL/6 mice than in tumor-bearing BALB/c mice (Fig. 1K and 1L and 1I and 1J, respectively), and was statistically significant only when blood samples from naïve and tumor-bearing mice were compared (Fig. 1L). Nevertheless, CD11b+ cells purified from RMA tumor-bearing mice inhibited proliferation of syngenic splenocytes to an extent comparable to CD11b+ cells purified from C26GM tumor-bearing mice (Fig. 2C).
Hence, tumor-induced altered regulation of myelopoiesis and accumulation of MDSC is a characteristic common to Th1 and Th2 strains as well as to tumors of different aggressiveness. Quantitative and qualitative differences in MDSC populations found in the two models may depend on several factors, among which the genetic background, tumor aggressiveness, and soluble factors released by tumor and stroma cells, including bone marrow derived cells, fibroblasts and endothelial cells .
Treatment of tumor-bearing mice with Arg and iNOS inhibitors restrain tumor growth
Similar experiments were conducted in the RMA model. Having verified in the C26GM model that the two delivery strategies were equally effective, and to avoid distress and/or pain to the animals, drugs were administered in the drinking water. Also in this model, L-NAME delayed tumor growth by approximately 50% (Fig. 3B). Conversely, sildenafil did not appear to be effective against RMA lymphoma. The scarce efficacy of sildenafil in restraining RMA growth does not appear to be related to the mouse strain, because Serafini et al. reported an excellent effect of sildenafil in C57BL/6 mice challenged with the fibrosarcoma MCA203 . This discrepancy may more likely be related to the characteristics of the two tumor models (e.g., cytokine production, immunogenicity, aggressiveness, stromal reaction).
Modification of tumor-associated myelopoiesis induced by modulators of arginine metabolism
In both tumor models a reduction statistically significant of CD11b+Gr1- cells was evident in the blood of sildenafil-treated mice when compared with untreated ones (Fig. 5B and 5D). Hence, it might be possible that sildenafil acts primarily on terminally differentiated CD11b+Gr1- cells . Together with the notion that in vivo sildenafil treatment reduces the enzymatic activity of iNOS and Arg in MDSC , our findings support the hypothesis that sildenafil has a potent inhibitory impact on the MDSC-mediated immunosuppressive mechanisms. Because sildenafil caused delayed tumor growth and a significant fall of both MDSC populations only in the C26GM model, it might be possible that sildenafil-induced containment of tumor growth is obtained only when myelopoiesis is redirected to more physiologic conditions. These hypotheses need further experimental support.
Treatment with L-NAME does not perturb tumor-draining lymph node cell composition
We recently reported that Treg accumulate in TDLN as well as in LN draining the site of vaccination , therefore suggesting that such recruitment is a physiologic hallmark of sites were an active immune response is taking place. Because MDSC can favor induction of Treg , we also investigated whether Treg recruitment in TDLN of BALB/c mice bearing C26GM tumors was further increased by tumor-associated MDSC and modified by L-NAME treatment. The absolute number of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ cells dramatically increased in TDLN, but was not modified by L-NAME treatment (Fig. 6L).
When similar analyses were conducted in TDLN collected from RMA-bearing C57BL/6 animals, results substantially overlapped the ones obtained in BALB/c mice bearing C26GM tumors. Indeed, no substantial differences in percentage and absolute number of CD4 and CD8 T cells were found in L-NAME and vehicle-treated mice (Fig. 6F and 6J, respectively). A slightly and yet statistically significant reduction in the absolute number of Treg was found in TDLN from L-NAME treated animals (Fig. 6N). A similar result was obtained in sildenafil treated animals (absolute number of Treg: 10,00 ± 0,24 × 103; n = 5).
All together, these data suggest that L-NAME does not substantially modify the physiologic perturbation of LN composition in TDLN.
Treatment with L-NAME augments the endogenous antitumor immunity
Since it is well known that NO participates in the regulation of various cell activities, to exclude that L-NAME and sildenafil exerted a direct effect on RMA cells by affecting doubling time and/or favoring apoptosis, we assessed the in vitro proliferation potential of RMA cells in the presence of either one of two drugs. Both L-NAME and sildenafil neither altered RMA proliferation rate, nor increased apoptosis (data not shown), therefore excluding this possibility.
Taken together, these data demonstrate that L-NAME treatment has the potential to augment the endogenous antitumor immunity. Because MDSC seem not to block the early events of T cell activation and IFN-γ production , we can hypothesize that L-NAME favors IFN-γ production by other yet uncovered mechanisms.
Elucidation of the mechanisms by which a growing tumor eludes immunosurveillance and identification of strategies to overcome tumor-associated immunosuppression are essential issues that need to be addressed, in order to obtain the most rewarding clinical benefits from the application of immunotherapeutic strategies to cancer patients. Our results, obtained in different tumor models and murine strains, indicate that tumor growth is associated with perturbation of myelopoiesis and accumulation of MDSC. Treatment of tumor-bearing mice with modulators of arginine metabolism may modify such accrual, augment the endogenous tumor-specific immune response and restrain tumor growth.
Because neither in our nor in other tumor models inhibition of MDSC function by different means caused complete tumor regression [21, 23, 39, 40], it is likely that acting simultaneously on more than one of the know tumor-associated immunosuppressive mechanisms will result in more successful therapeutic effects. As an example, sildenafil treatment improves the efficacy of adoptive cell therapy . Further investigation in this direction is warranted to confirm this hypothesis.
Cell lines and reagents
C26GM (H-2d) is a carcinogen-induced colon carcinoma subcloned from the CT26 cell line, and genetically modified to produce GM-CSF . Cells were cultured in DMEM (Invitrogen, Milano, Italy) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 150 U/ml streptomycin, 200 U/ml penicillin and 10% heat-inactivated FBS (Invitrogen). RMA (H-2b) is a Rauscher virus-induced thymoma . EL4G- (H-2b) is a 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene induced thymoma . Both cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Invitrogen) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 150 U/ml streptomycin, 200 U/ml penicillin and 10% heat-inactivated FBS (Invitrogen). Unless specified, all chemical reagents were from Sigma-Aldrich, and monoclonal antibodies (mAb) were from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA).
Mice and in vivo experiments
BALB/c (H-2d) and C57BL/6 (H-2b) female mice, 8–10 weeks old, were purchased from Charles River (Calco, Italy), housed in a specific pathogen-free animal facility, and treated in accordance with the European Union guidelines, and with the approval of the Institutional Ethical Committee (IACUC approval # 311). Five hundred thousand C26GM cells and 7 × 104 RMA cells were injected s.c. on the left flank of BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice, respectively. L-NAME (given i.p. at 80 mg/Kg/24 h or added in drinking water at 1 g/L) or sildenafil (Pfizer, New York, NY, given i.p. at 20 mg/Kg/24 h or dissolved in drinking water at 20 mg/Kg/24 h) were administered starting on the day of tumor challenge. As control, groups of animals were treated with vehicle (PBS) only. Water was given ad libitum. Calculation of the dosage of each drug was based on the assumption that a mouse drinks approximately 3 ml/24 h. Tumor size was evaluated by measuring two perpendicular diameters by a caliper every other day, and BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice were sacrificed after 9 and 15 days, respectively. When needed, several organs were collected, fixed in 4% formalin for 6 h, then embedded and included in paraffin wax as previously described . Five-mm thick sections were cut and stained with H&E (Bio-Optica, Milano, Italy).
Phenotypic characterization of cell populations
TDLN and LN from naïve mice and tumor-challenged mice were processed on a cell strainer and stained with FITC-labeled anti-CD4, PE- labeled anti-CD44 and PerCP-Cy 5.5-labeled anti-CD8 mAb. Dead cells were excluded by physical parameters and/or by the addition of ToPro-5 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) immediately before flow cytometry analysis. For enumeration of MDSC cells, blood and splenocytes from naïve and tumor-challenged mice were stained with FITC-conjugated CD11b and APC-conjugate Gr1 mAb. For enumeration of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ cells, LN cells were stained with FITC-labeled anti-CD4, PerCP-Cy 5.5-labeled anti-CD8 and APC-labeled anti-CD25 (clone PC61) mAb, permeabilized and finally, stained with PE-labeled anti-Foxp3 mAb (eBioscience, SanDiego, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. In all experiments, cells were analyzed on a BD FacsCalibur®.
Intracellular cytokine measurement
Single cell suspensions of splenocytes from naïve and RMA-challenged mice were restimulated in vitro with mitomycin-c treated RMA cells [37, 38]. For intracellular cytokine measurement, day-5-blasts were challenged in vitro with RMA or EL4G- cells (1:1 ratio), or phorbol 12-myristate 13-acete (PMA)/ionomycin, and stained with FITC-labeled anti-CD44, PE-labelled anti-CD4, PerCP-Cy 5.5-labeled anti-CD8, and APC-labeled anti-IFN-γ mAb as previously described .
CD11b+ cell purification and in vitro functional assays
CD11b+ cells purification was performed with mouse CD11b MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions. Purity of the cell population was evaluated by flow cytometry and exceeded 90%. BALB/c splenocytes (6 × 105 cells/well) were stimulated in wells that had been coated with 3 μg/ml anti CD3 and 2 μg/ml anti-CD28 mAb, or alternatively, with an equal number of γ-irradiated C57BL/6 splenocytes. Purified splenic CD11b+ cells were added to the culture so as to constitute 20% of the total cells. After 3 days of incubation, cultures were pulsed with 3H-Thymidine (1 μCi/well; Amersham Corp., Milan, Italy) for the last 18 h. The incorporation of 3H-Thymidine by proliferating T cells (triplicate cultures) was measured by scintillation counting. Alternatively, CD11b+ cells were assessed for enzymatic activity by QuantiChrom™ Arginase Assay Kit (BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA) following manufacturer's instructions. Results were normalized to 106 cells.
Statistical analyses were performed using the Student's T test. Values were considered statically significant for p < 0.05.
The work was partially supported by grants from Ministero della Salute, Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca, and Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro. GC has been awarded a scholarship initially from Sovvenzione Globale Ingenio, Regione Lombardia, and subsequently form the American-Italian Cancer Foundation. We thank M.P. Protti (Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, Milan, Italy) for helpful discussions and critical comments on the manuscript.
- Mellor AL, Munn DH: Creating immune privilege: active local suppression that benefits friends, but protects foes. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008, 8: 74-80. 10.1038/nri2233.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rabinovich GA, Gabrilovich D, Sotomayor EM: Immunosuppressive Strategies that are Mediated by Tumor Cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007, 25: 267-96. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141609.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sakaguchi S: Naturally arising Foxp3-expressing CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells in immunological tolerance to self and non-self. Nat Immunol. 2005, 6: 345-52. 10.1038/ni1178.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Curiel TJ: Tregs and rethinking cancer immunotherapy. J Clin Invest. 2007, 117: 1167-74. 10.1172/JCI31202.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gabrilovich DI, Bronte V, Chen SH, Colombo MP, Ochoa A, Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Schreiber H: The terminology issue for myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 425-10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3037. author reply 426PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Talmadge JE: Pathways mediating the expansion and immunosuppressive activity of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and their relevance to cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13: 5243-8. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0182.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Serafini P, De Santo C, Marigo I, Cingarlini S, Dolcetti L, Gallina G, Zanovello P, Bronte V: Derangement of immune responses by myeloid suppressor cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2004, 53: 64-72. 10.1007/s00262-003-0443-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sica A, Bronte V: Altered macrophage differentiation and immune dysfunction in tumor development. J Clin Invest. 2007, 117: 1155-66. 10.1172/JCI31422.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leenen PJ, de Bruijn MF, Voerman JS, Campbell PA, van Ewijk W: Markers of mouse macrophage development detected by monoclonal antibodies. J Immunol Methods. 1994, 174: 5-19. 10.1016/0022-1759(94)90005-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gallina G, Dolcetti L, Serafini P, De Santo C, Marigo I, Colombo MP, Basso G, Brombacher F, Borrello I, Zanovello P, et al.: Tumors induce a subset of inflammatory monocytes with immunosuppressive activity on CD8+ T cells. J Clin Invest. 2006, 116: 2777-90. 10.1172/JCI28828.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang R, Cai Z, Zhang Y, Yutzy WHt, Roby KF, Roden RB: CD80 in immune suppression by mouse ovarian carcinoma-associated Gr-1+CD11b+ myeloid cells. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 6807-15. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3755.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang B, Pan PY, Li Q, Sato AI, Levy DE, Bromberg J, Divino CM, Chen SH: Gr-1+CD115+ immature myeloid suppressor cells mediate the development of tumor-induced T regulatory cells and T-cell anergy in tumor-bearing host. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 1123-31. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1299.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Filipazzi P, Valenti R, Huber V, Pilla L, Canese P, Iero M, Castelli C, Mariani L, Parmiani G, Rivoltini L: Identification of a new subset of myeloid suppressor cells in peripheral blood of melanoma patients with modulation by a granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulation factor-based antitumor vaccine. J Clin Oncol. 2007, 25: 2546-53. 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.5829.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bronte V, Zanovello P: Regulation of immune responses by L-arginine metabolism. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005, 5: 641-54. 10.1038/nri1668.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mazzoni A, Bronte V, Visintin A, Spitzer JH, Apolloni E, Serafini P, Zanovello P, Segal DM: Myeloid suppressor lines inhibit T cell responses by an NO-dependent mechanism. J Immunol. 2002, 168: 689-95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fukumura D, Kashiwagi S, Jain RK: The role of nitric oxide in tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006, 6: 521-34. 10.1038/nrc1910.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagaraj S, Gupta K, Pisarev V, Kinarsky L, Sherman S, Kang L, Herber DL, Schneck J, Gabrilovich DI: Altered recognition of antigen is a mechanism of CD8+ T cell tolerance in cancer. Nat Med. 2007, 13: 828-35. 10.1038/nm1609.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muller AJ, Scherle PA: Targeting the mechanisms of tumoral immune tolerance with small-molecule inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006, 6: 613-25. 10.1038/nrc1929.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bronte V, Kasic T, Gri G, Gallana K, Borsellino G, Marigo I, Battistini L, Iafrate M, Prayer-Galetti T, Pagano F, et al.: Boosting antitumor responses of T lymphocytes infiltrating human prostate cancers. J Exp Med. 2005, 201: 1257-68. 10.1084/jem.20042028.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Orucevic A, Bechberger J, Green AM, Shapiro RA, Billiar TR, Lala PK: Nitric-oxide production by murine mammary adenocarcinoma cells promotes tumor-cell invasiveness. Int J Cancer. 1999, 81: 889-96. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990611)81:6<889::AID-IJC9>3.0.CO;2-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cahlin C, Gelin J, Delbro D, Lonnroth C, Doi C, Lundholm K: Effect of cyclooxygenase and nitric oxide synthase inhibitors on tumor growth in mouse tumor models with and without cancer cachexia related to prostanoids. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 1742-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Qiu H, Orr FW, Jensen D, Wang HH, McIntosh AR, Hasinoff BB, Nance DM, Pylypas S, Qi K, Song C, et al.: Arrest of B16 melanoma cells in the mouse pulmonary microcirculation induces endothelial nitric oxide synthase-dependent nitric oxide release that is cytotoxic to the tumor cells. Am J Pathol. 2003, 162: 403-12.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Serafini P, Meckel K, Kelso M, Noonan K, Califano J, Koch W, Dolcetti L, Bronte V, Borrello I: Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition augments endogenous antitumor immunity by reducing myeloid-derived suppressor cell function. J Exp Med. 2006, 203: 2691-702. 10.1084/jem.20061104.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bronte V, Serafini P, De Santo C, Marigo I, Tosello V, Mazzoni A, Segal DM, Staib C, Lowel M, Sutter G, et al.: IL-4-induced arginase 1 suppresses alloreactive T cells in tumor-bearing mice. J Immunol. 2003, 170: 270-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Griswold DP, Corbett TH: A colon tumor model for anticancer agent evaluation. Cancer. 1975, 36: 2441-4. 10.1002/1097-0142(197512)36:6<2441::AID-CNCR2820360627>3.0.CO;2-P.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bronte V, Apolloni E, Cabrelle A, Ronca R, Serafini P, Zamboni P, Restifo NP, Zanovello P: Identification of a CD11b(+)/Gr-1(+)/CD31(+) myeloid progenitor capable of activating or suppressing CD8(+) T cells. Blood. 2000, 96: 3838-46.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gordon S, Taylor PR: Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005, 5: 953-64. 10.1038/nri1733.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kusmartsev S, Gabrilovich DI: STAT1 signaling regulates tumor-associated macrophage-mediated T cell deletion. J Immunol. 2005, 174: 4880-91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ljunggren HG, Karre K: Host resistance directed selectively against H-2-deficient lymphoma variants. Analysis of the mechanism. J Exp Med. 1985, 162: 1745-59. 10.1084/jem.162.6.1745.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bissell MJ, Radisky D: Putting tumours in context. Nat Rev Cancer. 2001, 1: 46-54. 10.1038/35094059.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bronte V, Serafini P, Mazzoni A, Segal DM, Zanovello P: L-arginine metabolism in myeloid cells controls T-lymphocyte functions. Trends Immunol. 2003, 24: 302-6. 10.1016/S1471-4906(03)00132-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zatz R, Baylis C: Chronic nitric oxide inhibition model six years on. Hypertension. 1998, 32: 958-64.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baylis C, Mitruka B, Deng A: Chronic blockade of nitric oxide synthesis in the rat produces systemic hypertension and glomerular damage. J Clin Invest. 1992, 90: 278-81. 10.1172/JCI115849.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reisser D, Onier-Cherix N, Jeannin JF: Arginase activity is inhibited by L-NAME, both in vitro and in vivo. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2002, 17: 267-70. 10.1080/1475636021000006252.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martin-Fontecha A, Sebastiani S, Hopken UE, Uguccioni M, Lipp M, Lanzavecchia A, Sallusto F: Regulation of dendritic cell migration to the draining lymph node: impact on T lymphocyte traffic and priming. J Exp Med. 2003, 198: 615-21. 10.1084/jem.20030448.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Degl'Innocenti E, Grioni M, Capuano G, Jachetti E, Freschi M, Bertilaccio MT, Hess-Michelini R, Doglioni C, Bellone M: Peripheral T-cell tolerance associated with prostate cancer is independent from CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Cancer Res. 2008, 68: 292-300. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2429.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Iezzi G, Protti MP, Rugarli C, Bellone M: B7.1 expression on tumor cells circumvents the need of professional antigen presentation for in vitro propagation of cytotoxic T cell lines. Cancer Res. 1996, 56: 11-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Iezzi G, Rivolta L, Ronchetti A, Martin-Fontecha A, Rosato A, Protti MP, Sabbadini MG, Bellone M: The immunogenicity of experimental tumors is strongly biased by the expression of dominant viral cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitopes. Cancer Res. 1997, 57: 2564-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kusmartsev S, Cheng F, Yu B, Nefedova Y, Sotomayor E, Lush R, Gabrilovich D: All-trans-retinoic acid eliminates immature myeloid cells from tumor-bearing mice and improves the effect of vaccination. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 4441-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Santo C, Serafini P, Marigo I, Dolcetti L, Bolla M, Del Soldato P, Melani C, Guiducci C, Colombo MP, Iezzi M, et al.: Nitroaspirin corrects immune dysfunction in tumor-bearing hosts and promotes tumor eradication by cancer vaccination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 4185-90. 10.1073/pnas.0409783102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gorer PA: Studies in antibody response of mice to tumour inoculation. Br J Cancer. 1950, 4: 372-9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bertilaccio MT, Grioni M, Sutherland BW, Degl'Innocenti E, Freschi M, Jachetti E, Greenberg NM, Corti A, Bellone M: Vasculature-targeted tumor necrosis factor-alpha increases the therapeutic index of doxorubicin against prostate cancer. Prostate. 2008, 68: 1105-15. 10.1002/pros.20775.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Camporeale A, Boni A, Iezzi G, Degl'Innocenti E, Grioni M, Mondino A, Bellone M: Critical impact of the kinetics of dendritic cells activation on the in vivo induction of tumor-specific T lymphocytes. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 3688-94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.